Bryan_Willman
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 11
Maybe this has been said, but I've not seen it.
In selecting a weapon for home defense, people tend to talk/think about:
a. ease of use in a crises
b. ability to STOP the attacker (or drive them off)
c. minimize collateral damage - usually focused on penetration
All excellent considerations.
I'd like to suggest thinking about c. in a different way. A quick visit to the boxotruth, as well as any number of references, will show that any round which is a good stopper will also tend to be a good penetrator.
But another thing to consider is what I'll call the "clear miss range". Illustration:
Goblin is charging you full speed with a machete and loudly asserting he'll cut your head off, after battering your door in with his head. So, you shoot him.
If you miss clean with, say, a .300win mag, the bullet will be a terrible hazard to anybody within what, 1000 yards? (Setting off reactive targets at boomershoot at 700yards somewhat *up hill* was easy for .300wsm, and the elevation on the gun was quite low...)
Same clean miss with, say, a 12ga slug, the bullet is still a terrible hazard, but to a much shorter range (200 yards, say? 100 yards realistically?) That's still a long long way. But much shorter.
The area affected grows with the square of the distance. Think about how many people you'd rather not shoot by accident live within 200 yards (or whatever) versus 1000 yards (say)
It's also worth considering realistic ranges - you hopefully aren't firing at 45degrees for maximum possible range, but rather aiming at the attacker.
And finally, as has been pointed out, it's the cartridge and its muzzle velocity that matter - so a PLR16 firing 5.56mm FMJs, while very short barrelled, will still have a zone of collateral damage a lot like an M4...
In selecting a weapon for home defense, people tend to talk/think about:
a. ease of use in a crises
b. ability to STOP the attacker (or drive them off)
c. minimize collateral damage - usually focused on penetration
All excellent considerations.
I'd like to suggest thinking about c. in a different way. A quick visit to the boxotruth, as well as any number of references, will show that any round which is a good stopper will also tend to be a good penetrator.
But another thing to consider is what I'll call the "clear miss range". Illustration:
Goblin is charging you full speed with a machete and loudly asserting he'll cut your head off, after battering your door in with his head. So, you shoot him.
If you miss clean with, say, a .300win mag, the bullet will be a terrible hazard to anybody within what, 1000 yards? (Setting off reactive targets at boomershoot at 700yards somewhat *up hill* was easy for .300wsm, and the elevation on the gun was quite low...)
Same clean miss with, say, a 12ga slug, the bullet is still a terrible hazard, but to a much shorter range (200 yards, say? 100 yards realistically?) That's still a long long way. But much shorter.
The area affected grows with the square of the distance. Think about how many people you'd rather not shoot by accident live within 200 yards (or whatever) versus 1000 yards (say)
It's also worth considering realistic ranges - you hopefully aren't firing at 45degrees for maximum possible range, but rather aiming at the attacker.
And finally, as has been pointed out, it's the cartridge and its muzzle velocity that matter - so a PLR16 firing 5.56mm FMJs, while very short barrelled, will still have a zone of collateral damage a lot like an M4...