Anti-gun Gun argument counter

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't really win, most of our pro gun arguments are logic based and based on facts used to combat the emotional and irrational anti gun arguments.

You can't counter that statement without either dismissing christianity or religion entirely or bringing in your own religious beliefs or interpretations. neither of which will be very effective imo.
 
In Hebrew, the first commandment is Though shall not murder. Murder was changed to kill with translations of the bible, but it's well documented that the original word and intent was murder.
 
Here's just one example of God's people preparing to defend themselves.

Nehemiah 4: 11And our adversaries said, "They shall not know, neither see, until we come in the midst among them and slay them and cause the work to cease."


12And it came to pass that when the Jews who dwelt by them came, they said unto us ten times, "From all places whence ye shall return unto us, they will be upon you."


13Therefore set I men in the lower places behind the wall, and on the higher places; I even set the people by families with their swords, their spears, and their bows.

14And I looked, and rose up, and said unto the nobles and to the rulers and to the rest of the people, "Be not ye afraid of them; remember the Lord, who is great and fearsome, and fight for your brethren, your sons and your daughters, your wives and your houses."

15And it came to pass, when our enemies heard that it was known unto us and God had brought their counsel to nought, that we returned all of us to the wall, every one unto his work.


16And it came to pass from that time forth, that the half of my servants wrought in the work, and the other half of them held both the spears, the shields and the bows and the jackets of mail; and the rulers were behind all the house of Judah.

17Those who built on the wall and those who bore burdens with those who loaded -- every one with one of his hands wrought in the work and with the other hand held a weapon.

18For the builders, every one, had his sword girded by his side, and so built. And he that sounded the trumpet was by me.


19And I said unto the nobles and to the rulers and to the rest of the people, "The work is great and large, and we are separated upon the wall, one far from another.


20In what place therefore ye hear the sound of the trumpet, resort ye thither unto us. Our God shall fight for us."


21So we labored in the work; and half of them held the spears from the rising of the morning until the stars appeared.
 
Anyone who wants to live the literal Bible needs to make human sacrifices and blood offerings on altars.

Nature (God) has endowed EVERY living creature the right to defend itself and that includes human beings. Anyone, any Church, any clergy who denies that right is not religious, but political.

I struggle to understand why 78% of Jewish voters supported a guy who is a Socialist and wants all power invested in the central government. You would think that their previous experience with an all powerful, Socialist central government might have taught them a lesson. Apparently not...
 
Luke 22:36 - Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

Nehemiah 4:14 - And I looked, and rose up, and said unto the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your houses.

I Timothy 5:8 - But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.

Psalms 144:1 - Blessed be the Lord my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.

I don't know, sounds like God expects us to be prepared, armed, and trained to defend ourselves and our loved ones.

As said before the injunction about turning the other cheek was meant to apply to insult and hurt pride and not life threatening assault.

Another quote that may be thrown in your face is: "Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." - Matthew 26:52 - which is not about use of force to defend oneself but about living a life of violence - those who choose to live by violence will die by violence - i.e. Jesus was telling Peter he was to rely upon God first and not his sword first - which was Peters' initial reaction - and then he told Peter to sheath his sword, he did not tell him to discard it.

Lastly, you might get - Thou shalt not kill - Exodus 20:13 - which is the simplest to address as it is most accurately translated as Thou shalt not murder - it is a prohibition against murder and not the use of lethal force in self defense.
 
kill vs. murder

Thou shalt not kill - Exodus 20:13 - which is the simplest to address as it is most accurately translated as Thou shalt not murder - it is a prohibition against murder and not the use of lethal force in self defense.

Exactly.

Ecclesiastes 3:1–3
1 To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
2 a time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;
3 a time to kill, and a time to heal;...
 
"Anyone who is a Christian, and owns a gun is a total hypocrite."
sounds kinda like the anti hunting/fishing pretending their christians,I'm sitting there fishing and they are argueing with me about it finally their like "What would Jesus do" my answer was 'in the bible it say's he cooked em over and open fire just like me. they quickly left after that. the defenition of hypocrite is:1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion. thats like those anti's.
 
I don't think that it is hypocritical to be Christian and to own a gun. However, when people start making wrathful biblical quotes in attempt to justify their gun ownership to a non-gun-owner/non-Christian, it ends up sounding like religious fanaticism.

I think that it would be best for the proliferation of our gun rights if we kept our guns and our religions separately. IMO
 
In the the book of Nehemiah, the people of Jerusalem had to rebuild the wall surrounding their badly damaged hometown. Foreign nations wanted to kill them all while they were building, but the Israelites took precautions to fight any would be attackers. it went like this-

Nehemiah 4:12-19 (New Living Translation)

12 The Jews who lived near the enemy came and told us again and again, “They will come from all directions and attack us!” 13 So I placed armed guards behind the lowest parts of the wall in the exposed areas. I stationed the people to stand guard by families, armed with swords, spears, and bows.

14 Then as I looked over the situation, I called together the nobles and the rest of the people and said to them, “Don’t be afraid of the enemy! Remember the Lord, who is great and glorious, and fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes!”

15 When our enemies heard that we knew of their plans and that God had frustrated them, we all returned to our work on the wall. 16 But from then on, only half my men worked while the other half stood guard with spears, shields, bows, and coats of mail. The leaders stationed themselves behind the people of Judah 17 who were building the wall. The laborers carried on their work with one hand supporting their load and one hand holding a weapon. 18 All the builders had a sword belted to their side. The trumpeter stayed with me to sound the alarm.
 
Their stance is they you should actually turn the other cheek to allow them to rob, beat, kill their way through you and your family. They will give as example the crucifixion and such that you should in fact

Jesus said that true, He also forgave Peter for cutting off the soldier's ear that arrested Him. Jesus said to love thy neighbor as well as not to judge others. Nowhere does He say you have to be a fool about it. The Holy Church teaches us the suicide in any form is a mortal sin. Going placidly into a deadly situation with no attempt to save yourself is a form a suicide. Keeping a firearm is preparing for such an event and therefore blessed by the Church.
 
...it would be best for the proliferation of our gun rights if we kept our guns and our religions separately.

For me, that's impossible. It's a God-given right after all. My creator commands me to be armed and ready to defend life. How do I separate Him from what He has given me and to what He has commanded me? JMHO.

Fanatically religious rant over.:)
 
I think that it would be best for the proliferation of our gun rights if we kept our guns and our religions separately. IMO

The problem with that is when you try to decipher the meaning the Founders gave to the Second Amendment. They clearly had in mind that a right to protect one's own life and one's own country was a right given by God to Man and their Constitution simply recognized that right, it didn't grant that right.

It's hard to say they knew exactly what they were talking about if you remove half of the equation.

If you can't somehow get in the argument that these rights were pre-existing then you end up with a right that was given by a government and can therefore be taken away.
 
KBintheSLC wrote:

"However, when people start making wrathful biblical quotes in attempt to justify their gun ownership to a non-gun-owner/non-Christian, it ends up sounding like religious fanaticism."

Respectfully would state that closer to the truth would be that when people discover that someone actually takes their faith seriously enough to consider it a guide to their life by revealing that they have considered and thought through the real life implications to their faith - people often respond by accusing them of being religious fanatics - as an attempt to demean them and their personal faith. The original post did not specify whether or not the anti-RKBA person was a person of faith or not - oddly, my assumption was that it was more likely to be a nominally Christian anti - who had not fully thought through their faith rather than someone of the agnostic or atheistic faiths. If they were not of a Christian persuasion - then on what basis would they be attempting to quote scripture as an authority - when to the non-Christian scripture would be just so much irrational junk. If that were the case then quoting and discussing scripture might be as you posit useless as the person was not intending in the first place to engage in a serious discussion but merely making a mockingly sarcastic statement. In that case then yes the most appropriate response might be, Uhuh or please don't mock my faith or I would be happy to discuss my faith with you and how it impacts my RKBA if you are serious or simply no response at all.

"I think that it would be best for the proliferation of our gun rights if we kept our guns and our religions separately. IMO"

Which is another way to say the religion and politics should not mix - and in a certain sense I would agree - in terms of religion as representative of a formal organization - however the OP was addressing a situation involving another individual questioning a point of that individual's personal faith or belief system and not religion.

I realize that discussions of guns and the RKBA on this board that intersect with questions of personal faith make many uncomfortable - but I feel that this was a legitimate question to address - and that it deserves a serious answer - as gun owners who personally identify with the Christian faith and who take their faith seriously, do represent a large number of gun owners in this country. Although gun owners who do not share that faith may feel embarrassed by those who identify with the Christian faith and might wish that they would just keep quiet as they perceive them as an embarrassment to the RKBA community, such that when they quote scripture they may be portrayed as kooks or fanatics in the main stream media and/or in the minds of those who do not share that faith. However, that seems to me to be more of an issue of toleration and acceptance of different views within the RKBA community just as it is in society as a whole. It is an issue similar to the one that comes up often in discussions of the NRA/JFPO/GOA/SAF/etc… as being too hard core or too soft on the RKBA or in discussions on NFA firearms and devices or felons and the RKBA.

If this were a discussion or topic characterized by proselytizing or attempts to demean individuals of different belief systems - such as if you don’t believe as I do then you are….. - then it would be inappropriate. However as it is, I feel that it is respectfully addressing a real issue - that judging from the responses in this thread - other individuals have found it necessary to address in their own lives and experience.
 
Why I'd have them watch Moral Orel, "Turn the Other Cheek"; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbe820j-oWU

LYRICS
you've got to
turn the other cheek
turn the other cheek
show the world how strong you are
by simply acting weak
inherit all the world someday
'cause you will be the meek
show them just how meek
when you turn the other cheek
 
"I think that it would be best for the proliferation of our gun rights if we kept our guns and our religions separately. IMO"

Aside from several comments others have made, I also will state, that having separation between your religious/spiritual "you" and your secular "you" is in essence an affront to God(or in most other religions whatever entity you believe in), and more over a deceit towards your fellow man.

One cannot simply turn on and off faith like a light switch. It is a part of that person, as much so as their ability to reason, or emotionally feel, or perform math, or read/speak language perhaps even more so than those other abilities since our spirit is eternal.

Simply put, I cannot stop being Christian me, in order to be secular me. I am simply me.

One cannot sideline their faith and then claim to live a faithful life in a secular fashion. Either their actions are contained within a framework of faith or they are not.

It is generally why I find it laughable when politicians who claim to be believers in any faith, state that they will not allow their faith to interfere with their ability to govern. It would be just as laughable to hear them say "I will not allow my ability to feel emotion to interfere with my ability to govern.".

And without meaning to sound all Zen like, the trick is not to seperate or compartmentalize your life in order to make certain aspects of life convenient, but rather to find a wholistic approach to living in which all aspects are in balance and support each other and are contained within a framework of faith.

Ultimately how this pertains to self defense and gun ownership, if I have to defend myself, my loved ones, or an innocent with lethal force, I know that I will not be blemished in the eyes of the Lord for that action.

And when talking to fellow Christians about this topic, I find scriptures that plainly support that view to be comforting and instilling of my confidence to exercise my right to self defense and defense of innocents.

When talking to non-Christians about why I choose to defend myself, I have to honestly say that my religion plays a part in why I have my stance(it is the truth afterall), and that at times can open the door to witness to them as well.
 
Luke 22:36 He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
 
Tell them that you are not as good of a Christian as you should be and you are prepared for people that are even worse.
 
I am hoping this does not skirt itself too far into religious territory but it is a comment I have heard a LOT.

Among the many arguments you will get from the anti's is this:

"Anyone who is a Christian, and owns a gun is a total hypocrite."

Their stance is they you should actually turn the other cheek to allow them to rob, beat, kill their way through you and your family. They will give as example the crucifixion and such that you should in fact

So my questions is this, using non inflammatory educated discussion, how would you counter this position?
No intelligent person should lower themselves to the IQ level of a person who would make a statement like that! To try to counter this kind of statement is fruitless.
 
Didn't He say something about if you don't have a sword,sell your garmet, and get you one? and wouldn't a sword be sorta the 1911 of it's day?
 
Among the many arguments you will get from the anti's is this:

"Anyone who is a Christian, and owns a gun is a total hypocrite."

I just love (not :scrutiny:) these luke-warm, convenient-Christians.. As they should believe in His, own, written, Words..

"Judge not, least ye be judged"


Me, I'm just a Christian with guns to fight evil if it shows its face with bodily harm on its mind to me or my family, etc.


Ls
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top