AlexanderA
Member
There was an interesting op-ed piece by Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post this morning:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c4f33c-9633-11e2-8b4e-0b56f26f28de_story.html
Given that the Washington Post is a leading cheerleader for gun control, Marcus' plea to her fellow antigunners to accept a background check bill without a recordkeeping requirement is very telling. It means that the antigunners are beginning to think that they will end up not getting anything at all.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c4f33c-9633-11e2-8b4e-0b56f26f28de_story.html
Given that the Washington Post is a leading cheerleader for gun control, Marcus' plea to her fellow antigunners to accept a background check bill without a recordkeeping requirement is very telling. It means that the antigunners are beginning to think that they will end up not getting anything at all.