Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AOL sued for allowing harrassing internet postings...

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Marty Hayes, Jan 13, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Marty Hayes

    Marty Hayes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    66
    Location:
    Onalaska, WA
    http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/0112/chatroom_suit_ctv.html

    In a flame war a month or so, I made the comment about forum owners such as THR being sued for allowing defamatory posts on their forums. This particular case involves a chat room, not a forum, but the legal arguments should be similar. While I also believe that this particular case is a looser, it should give forum owners and posters pause to think. Even if AOL wins, it still costs $$$ for attorneys fees.
     
  2. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,717
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    It will now be interesting to see if the passage of HR 3402 (now Public Law 109-162) with Section 113, making illegal the posting of annoying or harassing remarks on the internet not under one's real name, will facilitate the filings of more web-based lawsuits in the future. As the one attorney in the story commented, "The internet is such a young medium ... "

    It was only a matter of time that civil lawsuits based on internet postings occurred ... We live in the most litigious society in the world; it's surprising it's only begun now ...
     
  3. merk

    merk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    183
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Wow, I guess people forget what that big X in the top right part of the window is for. And its surprising how old they were in those stories. I would expect someones mommy to do that, but not a 30 year old man.
     
  4. Rockrivr1

    Rockrivr1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,231
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    That's it "old" man. If you can't play nice your grounded with no internet priviledges!!!! Now apologize to the other old men and next time try to get along. :p


    Are you kidding me? Some people just have WAY to much time on their hands. :scrutiny:
     
  5. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,022
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Morons float to the surface of the sea of humanity on a regular basis.

    There... sue me!
     
  6. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    North Carolina
    This is akin to someone suing BellSouth because he got a harassing phone call from someone and simply refused to hang up. These "lawsuits" are really getting out of control. Everybody is looking for a payday and we all end up paying the price for it in the end. Wanna sue somebody??? Sue the jack@ss that harassed you, not AOL. AOL didn't do anything wrong.

    Greg
     
  7. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Tarp, yeah, but the moron doing the defaming has shallow pockets!:D
     
  8. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    Does this mean no more drink coasters and targets free at the checkout counter?
    :p
     
  9. agricola

    agricola Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,928
    Location:
    Office of the Holy Inquisition, Vatican City
    That is the most pathetic thing I have heard since the "McDonalds made me fat" lawsuit.
     
  10. XLMiguel

    XLMiguel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Somebody really, really, really, REALLY, needs to get a life. I guess he's of the same ilk that can't ell reality from TV, or thinks that the internet is somehow connected to "real life". Bleah.

    It's scary, though, that someone could actually file suit for such foolishness. Double bleah. [cranial/rectal inversion smiley here]
     
  11. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Why should it give them pause? Anybody can sue for anything in America, even if (as all the outside lawyers in this case agreed) it is patently obvious they will lose. In fact, I'd be willing to bet this case doesn't survive a motion for summary judgment.

    You acknowledge the case is a loser and won't go anywhere. So why should it give us pause? If somebody is willing to spend their own money to sue you in a sure loser of a case; exactly what are you going to do to stop them? Surely you aren't suggesting that people refrain from speaking their mind merely because there is a chance somebody with more money than sense will take offense and sue them?
     
  12. KriegHund

    KriegHund Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    Colorado, Broomfield
    Cripes, we cant offend people anymore?

    I dont cuss or say the "G" word on this forum cause if i did, i would be banned.
    That fine with me- its a private forum.

    If, however, i OFFEND someone, and they sue me for it, they can frack off, because
    A) They dont own the forum
    B) As long as it isnt libel...
     
  13. Turkey Creek

    Turkey Creek Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2003
    Messages:
    356
    Location:
    MO
    Pretty clever scam to allow legalized extortion- :cuss:
     
  14. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    So many assault lawyers! So few opportunities to get rich quick!
     
  15. XLMiguel

    XLMiguel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,551
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    KreigHund, you fergot to include the obvious, i.e.'the truth is a defense'. You know, just in case -:evil:
     
  16. Marty Hayes

    Marty Hayes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    66
    Location:
    Onalaska, WA
    It should give those posters who like to defame and harrass others pause, along with those creating forums where defamation and harrassment occur pause IF they alllow it to happen, that's all.

    Not saying forums shouldn't exist, I actually own one myself, (www.firearmsacademyonline.com, but I take reasonable precaustions to insure that disreputable conduct does not occur.

    Even looser lawsuits cost a bunch of money to defend, (I know from first hand experience). Anyone willing to guess how much AOl has spent in attorneys fees to defend this? Now, they make bunches of money and accept the risk, but how much revenue does the average forum like THR bring in?
     
  17. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Not much.

    We're not commercially supported, and upgrades to the equipment are paid for through generous donations from the members.

    Why, are you trying to size up a target? :neener:
     
  18. insurgent

    insurgent Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    48
  19. GigaBuist

    GigaBuist Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    2,261
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI
    From what I gather about the just ammened law you must mean that AOL chat rooms are NOT an "interactive computer system." If so... well, I'd be real giddy to see how you work that out.
     
  20. Marty Hayes

    Marty Hayes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    66
    Location:
    Onalaska, WA
    While I know you are just kidding, the fact is, that I am much more tuned into avoiding lawsuits than creating them.
     
  21. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Couldn't this possibly have a chilling effect on freedom of expression?
     
  22. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Personally, I have always held a low opinion of those whose only retort to "defamation" is to threaten a lawyer. I generally figure that if they were truly being defamed they could just tell us the truth and let people decide for themselves. When they try to silence someone through intimidation, it gives a lot more credence to the initial accusation, whether true or not.

    Well, if you want to live your life in fear of being sued, that is your choice. I am not modifying my behavior, especially when that behavior is protected by law, just because some bully doesn't like what I am saying.

    I think you also miss the whole revenue point behind this... obviously corporations like AOL are often prey in these suits because corporations are more concerned about the bottom line. They are more likely to settle a suit they know they will win because it is cheaper to settle than exercise their rights. This is why they get targeted to begin with.

    Internet forums like THR have no revenue to give up even if they were inclined to settle. So unless you know of an attorney out there holding a "Will work for server" placard, I don't see much threat to the smaller Internet forums.

    Besides, with the proposed changes to federal rules of civil procedure and a reversion to the earlier Rule 11 sanctions, suits like this one will soon become more expensive to the people bringing them than to the people defending against them...
     
  23. pax

    pax Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,762
    Location:
    Washington state
    Libel has always been against the law. If the libel laws have a chilling effect on speech, I sure as heck have never noticed it.

    Such laws do, however, give plenty of opportunity for bullies to bluster and threaten.

    pax
     
  24. Marty Hayes

    Marty Hayes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    66
    Location:
    Onalaska, WA
     
  25. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Well you seemed to be advocating not saying anything that might offend someone enough to sue you. In the case you provide for thought, the person was not defamed at all and the case for harassment is weak at best. Yet despite the weakness of the case and the opinion of several lawyers that work in that field that it will be DOA, you suggest that it would be better to act in a way that would avoid the lawsuit altogether.

    If you give up your legal rights because you fear you might be sued (even though you would easily win), then aren't you just encouraging people to use threats of lawsuits to silence speech they disagree with? At what point would you rather speak your mind and run the risk of being sued?

    You see, I am confused. You operate a forum yourself - this automatically increases the likelihood you may be sued. Obviously you feel there is some point where free speech is more important than legal risk. Yet here you seem to be counseling that it is better to say nothing at all rather than risk having even an unjustified lawsuit thrown at you. So what do you plan to do when someone at your forum threatens you with a lawsuit unless you remove some post they deem offensive?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page