Finger snap peak noise is a couple orders of magnitude slower.
Even the first shot-spotter systems had to be tweaked for a while to get them to sense fast enough to detect gunfire accurately.
So... I bet the watch app is not set up to sample fast enough. But it probably could be. Worth trying.
Finger snap peak noise is a couple orders of magnitude slower.
Even the first shot-spotter systems had to be tweaked for a while to get them to sense fast enough to detect gunfire accurately.
So... I bet the watch app is not set up to sample fast enough. But it probably could be. Worth trying.
It’s probably sending that info to a database. Apple is anti gun.
(Takes of tinfoil hat.).
I mean cool! That could be useful.
apple isn't nearly as bad as google regarding data privacyIt’s probably sending that info to a database. Apple is anti gun.
(Takes of tinfoil hat.).
I mean cool! That could be useful.
Or to put the shoe on the other foot, everybody's phone?Hmmmmmm something that could detect gunshot noise coupled with a built in gps. Can we have these installed in the Ankle monitors some people have to wear?
That's the pressure inside the barrel. Almost all the "noise" in gunfire is the over-pressure at bullet exit, that is much shorter in duration.https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/118601/what-is-the-duration-of-a-snap measured a snap at 1ms
depending on how you measure the "peak" (which is obviously only a point at the "peak") you could say it's practically at least .1-.2 ms long
View attachment 876487
It could help people who work around noise levels where they need protection but don't realize it.
Well that sucks.They tend to falsely report low so the opposite would be the case.