Tommygunn
Member
Is that just your opinion or are there published, scientifically valid tests that establish this?
500 rounds is long in the rear view mirror on both my sons' non-Colt ARs and they are having no problems with them.
Again, is this opinion and empirical observation or is there anything out there to show someone measured the gas flow from a sample of Colts and compared it to a number of samples from other makers?
My sons have not had any malfunctions with their ARs, so there's been nothing to diagnose. The men's group at church has a number of AR owners - only one Colt owner - and none of them have reported any malfunctions that were not attributable to cheap magazines
Again, something other than a "naked assertion" would be nice.
Bottom line is that despite all the sowing of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, nothing has been cited beyond unsubstantiated opinion to establish that the "dreaded Pony Premium" is doing anything more than paying the bills of its bankruptcy attorneys.
Finally, just how much reliance should someone put on Colt when the Army stripped them of the contract to make (most) M4 rifles citing "persistent reliability problems" back in 2013?
Colt does make very good civilian "M4orgeries," and hold up quit well. That does not mean other makers' guns aren't capable of doing very well ... maybe even better. It's a individual thing; remember that even top makers can turn out a lemon.
And anyway, a lot of parts are so easy to change out and replace, a bad dohickey is usually easily replaced by a mil spec good dohickey without a lot of grief.