I have both chrome-lined and unlined barrels and until this year, I did a fair bit of shooting with ARs.
In my opinion, the longevity, corrosion resistance, and ease of cleaning of a chrome barrel is overstated. I would also say that the decrease in accuracy from chrome lining is overstated as well. Most chrome-lined barrels were just 2-3MOA barrels to begin with and are still 2-3MOA barrels afterwards.
The anecdotal reports I have actually seen on longevity suggests that chrome lined barrels take longer to reach the "sweet spot" for accuracy; but hold that spot slightly longer and hold overall accuracy maybe 1,000 rounds longer than an unlined barrel of the same quality.
Ease of maintenance? Again, I think this has more to do with the initial quality of the barrel than the lining.
I think that chrome-lining does enhance reliability though. Because ARs are direct impingement they are very sensitive to the timing of the extraction and ejection. Chrome-lined chambers are a bit slicker and seem to be less sticky when they get dirty and hot (though an unlined chamber can still be very dirty and hot and function just fine).
At the end of the day, the quality of the barrel is more important than the lining issue. A stainless steel barrel from MSTN is going to blow away a mass-produced chrome-lined 1:9 from your local gun show parts house in every category. Likewise a chrome-lined GT Operator barrel will blow away the same 1:8 parts house stainless steel bull barrel in those same categories.
Also, the easy way to check for a chrome chamber is to look for the dull gray ring around the chamber. To check the bore (sometimes only the chamber is chromed on some Colts), remove the muzzle device and look for the same dull gray ring around the muzzle.