Size of bullet, size of throats if applicable, size of leade, velocity, powder used. In other words, things that would cause an issue.
Good question as well.
Good questions and I will reply as best I can at the moment. When I initially did the test I didn't measure leades or throats since I merely wanted to see how the coating held up. The original thread is here:
https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/powder-coated-bullet-retention-test-pics.787043/
The bright red bullets are .452 200gr. Powder used IIRC was Bullseye (known to soften powder coat over time). Velocity was around 1,089 FPS, fired from a USC rifle.
The dark red bullet is also .452, but 230gr. It was most likely fired from a 1911 using Unique powder, but I only discovered it laying on the ground while I was shooting, so I can't be sure of the details.
It would appear I posted the same bullet twice. The third bullet, now corrected is a .401 175gr fired from an AMT Javelina at 1,419 FPS.
I will have to measure the throats and leade of the guns the bullets were fired from as soon as I can get a chance to do so.
Since it keeps getting asked, the bright red is Harbor Freight powder coat and the other two are Hi-Tek. See post #26.
Again, the point of the pictures was to show that the surface of the coating does indeed get compromised during firing
Maybe the the plastic water jugs "stripped" the coating?
Out of a gazillion Hi Tec coated bullets shot, are we concerned about one or two ?? Powder coated, I can not speak to as those are a different animal and usually home brewed. I have smashed the snoot out of coated bullets and torched them with a propane torch and they fared very well
As I wait for Hurricane Irma, maybe I will go out in the garage and torture some more.
I'm not sure what you mean about being concerned about one or two. These were all I recovered from my somewhat limited testing. I have no reason to believe that more samples would not result in the same appearance.
The jugs/water do seem to have had an effect on the coating covering the front of the bullet but this is not the area of importance. (See above where the dark red one was NOT fired into any water whatsoever.) Most of the surface of a given bullet has no contact with the bore and the area of the bullet that seems to have the greatest impact regarding leading and coatings is the base. If you refer to the other thread, you can see that the coating on the bullet base largely stays intact across a range of velocities (for pistol).
I encourage others to also try to collect more data - it certainly can't hurt. My original thread/test was intended to add some pictorial data for everyone. Unfortunately I didn't have a better way to capture the bullets or to capture more of them.