Are ladies by their nature instinctively better shooters?

Are females by nature better shooters?

  • Yes

    Votes: 51 56.7%
  • No

    Votes: 39 43.3%

  • Total voters
    90
Status
Not open for further replies.
My grandfather told me this same thing about my mother when he took her shooting at one of the police ranges in Los Angeles. He gave her the S&W Model 19 he carried on duty and gave her the instruction and range rules and said that in her first day, she was a very competent shooter. 10 year old girl with bullets hanging out of her ears was drilling silhouette targets with a big heavy gun.
When my wife and I went shooting for her first time, I observed the same thing. I gave her some basic instruction and by the end of the ammo, she was very confident with my CZ-75B and even realized that she didn't like my old FN Forty-Nine. She said the FN felt better in the hand, but the trigger was too hard to pull and that her hand hurt after a magazine. She intuitively picked up on the .40S&W being a sharper, harshly recoiling cartridge.
So we bought her an FNP-9 and she shot it better than I did. Once she worked out how the sights were supposed to line up, she spent the rest of the day dinging plates at will with a big smile after each magazine.

And of course, there were lots of Russian women in The Great Patriotic War who demonstrated very deft control of their rifles while repelling fascist invaders from Germany. Perhaps not wanting to be raped and murdered if they were captured had something to do with it, but whatever it was, they took their training and put it to very good use.

It seems like they listen to instruction and figure out how to apply it pretty quickly. I don't know why that is and if it's even objectively true or because we tend to think of shooting sports as a man's sport, thus being surprised when a woman shows herself to be quite capable. And really, shooting well is far more about good technique than being able to muscle your way through it, which is very much an equalizer between the sexes. Sure a man has a considerable advantage in upper body and grip strength, but unless you're shooting magnums, it really doesn't matter; technique is more important.
You see the same thing in trying to teach a young kid how to properly swing a baseball/softball bat. They have to be shown to keep the back foot planted, the proper grip on the bat, how to use their whole core instead of just trying to shoulder/arm swing. Once they get it and make a solid hit, their whole face lights up and you see real improvement. I think a similar thing happens with female shooters. Once they figure out this odd mechanical thing, they just get it and because they absorbed the instruction you gave them, they intuit it very well.
 
So, what's your opinion? Given everything else being equal, are women, by their nature, instinctively or inherently, better shooters than men?
.

No. They are not better shooters by nature.

They are better learners.

I've been teaching firearms (specifically handguns) to women for the last 5-6 years professionally.

They do not bring bad habits, they do not bring preconceived notions about how to shoot, they do not bring their ego.

For the most part, they sponge up all the information presented and, starting from scratch, advance a lot faster than men who have been shooting incorrectly for years.
 
A lot of men have the attitude that guns are a guy thing, since they are guys they know it all, and won't listen to advice or instruction.
Women do not have that male ego thing blinding them and closing their ears.

And the typical female lesser upper body strength is compensated for by long term endurance.
 
So, what's your opinion? .
I think generalizations aren't very useful. I was in a CPL class recently and at the range it appears the ladies struggled (including demonstrations of poor muzzle discipline), despite a patient instructor.

I'm sure if I was at the next three class there would be equal numbers of examples of men who struggled. The point being that the gender generalizations don't really hold. I would say there's potentially one exception and (others have observed it) it's that more men tend to suffer from having seen too many action movies.
 
An awful lot of man-bashing here...

I don't think women are inherently better shooters. They supposedly have better coordination and fine motor skills, which can be an advantage, of course, but other than that, I would say not really.

Women have physical differences (if you haven't noticed) that can make shooting very difficult for them. Just holding the gun properly, whether handgun or longarm, can be hard for them to work out. I'll Weaver, but she'll have to Isosceles. ;)

I was shooting pistols with my girlfriend the other week, doing my best to teach her. Both .22 and .38 Smith and Wesson revolvers (yes, revolvers are pistols). We didn't shoot my .45. ;) She had not really shot handguns much at all before. Once we got grip and stance worked out best we could, and dry firing to see how everything was working before loading up, she did VERY well shooting the .22 both single action AND double action. Very good trigger finger control without moving the whole hand. When we went to the .38, she did well single action, but with double action, she began jerking the shots down, anticipating the increased recoil, which is understandable. I was impressed.
 
When we went to the .38, she did well single action, but with double action, she began jerking the shots down, anticipating the increased recoil, which is understandable.
But not desirable.
I guess I'm glad SWMBO happened to be good with and prefer the two firearms I have the most training with myself - the AR and the 1911. It's a good thing I have plenty of familiarity with my other firearms.....guess I know what the next AR build will be-another 10.5"
 
Beginning when they're girls and continuing the rest of their lives, females have better hand eye coordination than males. If they can handle the recoil and the noise most women can shoot better than most men.
 
Though there's nothing I can see about female anatomy that makes them inherently better shooters, I think they do have a few advantages.

  • They don't have the same ego issues as men, so they don't get hung up with self expectations that they can do all "manly" things well automatically, or else their manliness is in question. The absence of that self-judgement frees them up to simply do the task, have fun and make mistakes.
  • There is no societal expectation that they are automatically able to do all "manly" activities, and the absence of that pressure frees them up to actually listen to and follow direction when they are instructed.
Disadvantages revolve around the fact that females typically have 40% less upper body strength, so hefting and holding steady a large heavy firearm can be difficult for them to do without waivering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top