peacemaker45
Member
Would you be comfortable being identified as a "gunman?"
Here's a little blurb from an opinion column called "Plain Talk by Al Neuharth, USA TODAY founder." It appears in both print and online editions of the paper for 7/27-29/07, and referring to the goof ball on the YouTube debates last week.
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/07/will-online-sha.html#more
When I read that, I got a little irked that the fellow from Michigan (although I think he's a goof, as I said earlier) was characterized as a "gunman." Then, I got to thinking about the word itself. Gun. Not bad. Gun owners by definition have guns, like guns, etc. Man. Also, not bad. Many of us are men, in the gender sense of the word. We're all men in the older sense of Man(kind) or hu(Man.) Put them together, and why was I offended? I wasn't sure, so I looked up the word, to see if it was something more than the sum of its parts. Here's what I found:
From Wiktionary:
From Dictionary.com, several definitions:
Aha! I thought, a loaded word, given extra meanings by the way it's customarily used. A particularly nasty little bit of wordsmithing by Al Neuharth. Following close on Biden's heels, he's implying that gun owners = gunmen.
~~~Mat
Here's a little blurb from an opinion column called "Plain Talk by Al Neuharth, USA TODAY founder." It appears in both print and online editions of the paper for 7/27-29/07, and referring to the goof ball on the YouTube debates last week.
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/07/will-online-sha.html#more
There were also some sillies. Like a talking snowman speculating about global warming. A gunman asking whether his "baby" — an automatic weapon — was safe.
When I read that, I got a little irked that the fellow from Michigan (although I think he's a goof, as I said earlier) was characterized as a "gunman." Then, I got to thinking about the word itself. Gun. Not bad. Gun owners by definition have guns, like guns, etc. Man. Also, not bad. Many of us are men, in the gender sense of the word. We're all men in the older sense of Man(kind) or hu(Man.) Put them together, and why was I offended? I wasn't sure, so I looked up the word, to see if it was something more than the sum of its parts. Here's what I found:
From Wiktionary:
English
[edit] Noun
Singular
gunman
Plural
gunmen
gunman (plural gunmen)
a criminal armed with a gun, especially a professional killer
From Dictionary.com, several definitions:
gun·man Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[guhn-muhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -men. 1. a person armed with or expert in the use of a gun, esp. one ready to use a gun unlawfully.
2. a person who makes guns.
[Origin: 1615–25; gun1 + -man]
1. A man armed with a gun, especially an armed criminal or a professional killer.
2. A man skilled in the use of a gun.
1. a professional killer who uses a gun
2. a person who shoots a gun (as regards their ability)
Aha! I thought, a loaded word, given extra meanings by the way it's customarily used. A particularly nasty little bit of wordsmithing by Al Neuharth. Following close on Biden's heels, he's implying that gun owners = gunmen.
~~~Mat