Arguning with KAHR Tech Support...Am I CRAZY or Losing My MIND??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nalapombu

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2003
Messages
153
Location
Spring, TEXAS....USA
Hey all,

I just called KAHR and wanted to ask them a question about one of their handguns that I handled one day years ago and absolutely fell in LUST with it and have wanted one ever since.

Short explanation......

Probably 10 years ago I lived in my hometown of Huntington, WV. I knew about KAHR pistols, but never paid that much attention to them. I was nosing around in a cheesy pawn shop literally OUT IN THE STICKS when I came upon this KAHR that I had never seen before. I had them get it out and it was a great feeling pistol, much better than the other ones I had handled prior to this. This one was a long barreled pistol with the polymer frame. I vividly recall the model being the TP9. They wanted too much for it or I would've walked out that day with it. I've wanted one ever since. By the way, this was before the "Value Series" came out like they have now.


OK, now to today. The Kahr TP9 I handled those years ago was NOT the same as the ones they have now. The current TP9 (and the corresponding value series model) have a capacity of 8+1. They have a LONG grip frame. The one I handled did NOT have that length of grip frame. I don't know what the capacity was on that pistol, but it was NOT 8+1 like the ones now are. I'm guessing maybe 6+1. That short frame was what made that pistol feel and handle so great....and why I wanted it.

So....I can KAHR and wait for TECH SUPPORT. I knew the regular sales people wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. Turns out the TECH SUPPORT GUY didn't have a clue either.

I start by telling him about the pistol, the TP9 that I handled long ago and how it was NOT like the one they sold now. He stopped me right in my tracks and said they NEVER sold any kind of different TP9 than the one now. Thinking I didn't hear him right, I asked him again. He told me the TP9 that they sell now HAS ALWAYS been the one that they have sold. There was never a model or version of the TP that has less than the capacity it has now. I went through as described it in detail to him, right down to seeing the TP9 branding on the slide. His answer was that I must've go hold of one that some yahoo had cut down to accept a shorter magazine. I insisted that it was NOT a situation like that, it was a FACTORY piece. He insisted it was not and without actually telling me so, he thought I didn't know what I was talking about, mistaken, crazy or all 3.
After realizing that this guy was never going to accept that I saw what I saw, handled what I handled and that I have actually SEEN this model FOR SALE ON GUNBROKER from time to time, I told him that since he was not familiar with the pistol I was calling to talk about there was no reason to continue to talk to him. Which there wasn't. I wasn't being rude, just truthful.


I sat for 15 minutes after that call probing my memory on whether I could've been mistaken those years ago. I'm not perfect or infallible, but when it comes to a subject I LOVE like FIREARMS....I usually don't mess up such things.

I thought the only thing for me to do was come here and ask you guys (& gals) to see if I am ACTUALLY CRAZY in believing that I handled and wanted to buy a KAHR TP9 with a shorter frame than they have now and lower capacity than 8+1 like they have now.


What say you?


Thanks for "listening" to my tale.

Nalajr
 
Most likely not a TP9, but a P9 Covert. This model had the slide of the P9 mated to a shorter grip frame. They were only made for a short time.
 
The Kahr guy was right. You were wrong.

That said, Colt has been known to improperly rollmark pistols from time to time (Government-length 1991s with "Commander" markings and vice versa), so maybe it's possible Kahr did the same.
 
OK.....SO....I'm the CRAZY ONE that has no clue what I'm talking about huh?


This is from the KAHR site. It is the CURRENT TP9. It is 8+1
http://www.kahr.com/Pistols/Kahr-TP9.asp

Take note of the ROLL MARK that clearly says TP9. Then take a look at the end of the DUST GUARD on the end of the frame and also where the end of the slide is in relation to the frame. Also look at the grip. Notice how LONG it is.



NOW...

Head on over to this link.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=457612366

Notice all the same points on this TP9 that I pointed out on the version from the KAHR page. Look at the description. This is listed as having 7 round magazines making it a 7+1 pistol.

If you thought that maybe I was hoaxing an auction listing for my own means to an end, check this one out too.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=460400561

Also take note of the MODEL NUMBER listed for ALL 3 of them....TP9093


Another TP9 with the same features as I pointed out in the other TP9 auction. Pretty odd to have 2 MISTAKES from the factory that are mismarked that someone also cut back the dust cover on and BOTH are at auction at the same time. WEIRD ain't it?

Well I guess that would make it 3 weird TP9 pistols like that, counting the one that I insisted I saw, handled and wanted to buy that day. You know, the one that the KAHR guy and all 3 of you said I was CRAZY for believing they made.

Say....did you 3 work for KAHR recently?


Nalajr
 
Are you basing your argument on the capacity or can you really see a half inch difference? Either way, there is no reason to get insulting to folks answering the question...it isn't like they agreed with you that you were crazy.

I'm not sure going from 4.5" (the size of the P frame) to 5" (the size of the T frame) is a long difference. They made the running change in 2011...there was no change in model number nor was there any announcement. It pretty much went unnoticed as it looked exactly the same

The capacity did not change, they just used to use a longer/taller base plate to cover the difference between the mag and the frame. They did sell a shorter mag, but it only held one round less...that is what you are seeing on Gunbroker. They now sell the longer mag with the shorter base plate
 
A quick Internet search shows several references to the older model and in fact it would seem it did change as you described. This blog examines the details:

http://unreadbits.blogspot.com/2006/03/kahr-tp9-review.html

As for being CRAZY, I haven't seen ANYONE here mention that EXCEPT for you. It would SEEM that some of the replies are WRONG, but remember that this is a FORUM and not a REFERENCE library. Is ARGUNING the act of having AN ARGUMENT on the subject of GUNS? It SEEMS we ALL make MISTAKES from TIME to time. My CAPS LOCK key is MALFUNCTIONING.
 
A quick Internet search shows several references to the older model and in fact it would seem it did change as you described. This blog examines the details:

http://unreadbits.blogspot.com/2006/03/kahr-tp9-review.html

As for being CRAZY, I haven't seen ANYONE here mention that EXCEPT for you. It would SEEM that some of the replies are WRONG, but remember that this is a FORUM and not a REFERENCE library. Is ARGUNING the act of having AN ARGUMENT on the subject of GUNS? It SEEMS we ALL make MISTAKES from TIME to time. My CAPS LOCK key is MALFUNCTIONING.


The article you linked seems to be the (pardon the pun) smoking gun, to wit:"Checking Kahr's website, I noticed that Kahr has changed the TP9 to now have a longer grip (similar in length to the T9) that only uses the 8 round magazines without the grip extension. The model number seems to be unchanged (TP9093-NOVAK). The dust cover is also longer than before. The TP9 that I have circa 2005 has a grip length that is identical to the P9 (4.5" height). The new TP9 has a listed height of 5.08", similar to the T9 height of 4.95". I'm not sure I like this change, as having a shorter grip is better for concealment, and you can still use the 8 round w/ extension magazines with a shorter grip."
 
This thread is proving to be a good example of an interaction supporting the validity of having background checks for an item being sold with social consequences...
 
A quick Internet search shows several references to the older model and in fact it would seem it did change as you described. This blog examines the details:

http://unreadbits.blogspot.com/2006/03/kahr-tp9-review.html

As for being CRAZY, I haven't seen ANYONE here mention that EXCEPT for you. It would SEEM that some of the replies are WRONG, but remember that this is a FORUM and not a REFERENCE library. Is ARGUNING the act of having AN ARGUMENT on the subject of GUNS? It SEEMS we ALL make MISTAKES from TIME to time. My CAPS LOCK key is MALFUNCTIONING.
Now that's funny right there!
 
As for being CRAZY, I haven't seen ANYONE here mention that EXCEPT for you. It would SEEM that some of the replies are WRONG, but remember that this is a FORUM and not a REFERENCE library. Is ARGUNING the act of having AN ARGUMENT on the subject of GUNS? It SEEMS we ALL make MISTAKES from TIME to time. My CAPS LOCK key is MALFUNCTIONING.

Agreed (lol).

I almost bought one of the P9 frames with a T9 slide years ago, but it would have been one of those "eat ramen for a month or two" purchases. Glad I didnt, I later decided on a K9, settled for a P9 that didnt do it for me.
 
Lots of incorrect info in this thread.

All the Kahr Target models (T9, T40, TP9, TP40etc) have always had long grip frames

That is not correct.

...to see if I am ACTUALLY CRAZY in believing that I handled and wanted to buy a KAHR TP9 with a shorter frame than they have now and lower capacity than 8+1 like they have now.

Your memory is just fine. The original TP9 had a shorter grip than the one today. It held a 7 round magazine and even had a shorter, P9 sized dust cover on the frame. It was in fact essentially a P9 frame mated to a T slide. A few years ago Kahr started using a longer and taller frame for the polymer "T" series. I'm surprised a Kahr Tech did not know this. It is true that some people cut the polymer frames to make them easier to conceal. Kahr has also produced from time to time models they termed "covert". These are factory cut down models, but the TP was not one of them.

The way to tell the difference between an early factory TP and a cut down newer TP is the dust cover. A short cover is an original 7 round factory TP and a long duct cover is on a later made 8 round TP.

I suggest if you want one of these semi-rare short TP9 you buy a new one and chop the grip down to the size, P or PM, that you desire. A new one is a bit over $400, or if you don't need a polygonal barrel try a CT9 at under $300 - a great price IMHO.
 
Last edited:
As for being CRAZY, I haven't seen ANYONE here mention that EXCEPT for you. It would SEEM that some of the replies are WRONG, but remember that this is a FORUM and not a REFERENCE library. Is ARGUNING the act of having AN ARGUMENT on the subject of GUNS? It SEEMS we ALL make MISTAKES from TIME to time. My CAPS LOCK key is MALFUNCTIONING.

I'm not trying to add to the chaos, but this is seriously funny. I laughed more and more as I read it and was laughing out loud by the time I hit the last sentence.

Nice man.

As for the gun, if you can find what you are looking for on gunbroker, then buy one and be happy. Who cares what KAHR says? Waiting for tech support from any company to know what you are talking about from a memory that may or may not be fuzzy is a long wait for a train that isn't going to show up.
 
The funniest part of this thread is that the OP was absolutely right about the existence of a short grip frame TP9. I had never heard of this version of the TP9 until USP9 confirmed it.
 
At least this thread forced me to learn a little something about a pistol I care nothing about!

Still laughing, Miked7762.
 
Hey, I like Kahrs - bought a PM9 when those first came out, then a CW45 a couple years ago, and a CT380 last month. All great little pistols, reliable for me and easy to carry. :)
 
The pistol you saw could have been modified.
I own a P45 that I reduced the grip to PM45 length and now use the PM mags.
Came out perfectly.
Thats one of the beautiful things about polymer striker fired pistols - grip is only plastic with no parts.
Its become my favorite carry gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top