Arms at the Airports - Washington Post Editorial

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roadrunner

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
229
Location
Fairfax, VA
I don't think this editorial is a repost.

According to the writer, "Virginia . . . where people openly packing guns can sashay almost anywhere." Sashay?? I don't believe I've sashayed anywhere.

I don't know what this person's problem is, other then loathing firearm owners. Maybe the writer needs a hug. Before writing the editorial, he or she should have researched to find out just how many incidents/problems have occurred at Virginia airports that involved legal carry (either open or concealed) at airports and in terminal unsecure areas. I would suspect the number of incidents would have been few or zero.

Arms at the Airports

Monday, October 18, 2004; Page A18

THE WILD WEST mentality that has turned Virginia into Holster Heaven -- where people openly packing guns can sashay almost anywhere -- is making a grim mockery of security considerations at greater Washington's two airports in the Old Dominion. Though Ronald Reagan National Airport and Dulles International Airport don't -- and still won't -- allow weapons inside the terminals, on the airfields or in buildings adjacent to the airfields without prior arrangements, people will be free, as of Dec. 1, to transport their arsenals right onto the grounds and leave them stashed in their cars at the parking lots.

In the post-Sept. 11 world, that's irresponsible and dangerous. Yet as long as open-carry is the law in Virginia, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority has little choice. State law says the pistol packers can wear their weapons while motoring along state roads, including those that head to and through airport property. So what are gun owners stopping at the airport supposed to do with their weapons, other than lock them in their cars? The airports authority board voted this month to amend its regulations, officials explained, to prevent law-abiding people from inadvertently violating the regulations.

So now, outside the security check areas in terminals -- where at least some people have to step out of their shoes and undergo pat-downs and other safety checks -- the parking lots may be loaded with deadly weapons. How comforting is that? It's even worse in Virginia's other airports, where people can bring guns inside the terminals, though not beyond the checkpoints. Airports elsewhere in the country are subject to vastly differing state laws. Federal protections should extend to entire airport sites. Allowing arsenals in the parking lots of terminals serving the nation's capital -- just because these days "Virginia Is for Gun Lovers" -- is reckless.
 
Sashay? SASHAY?!

We need some input from the Pink Pistol members on if that's what they do when they carry.
 
"Nobody move! I'm hijacking this terminal and taking it to Cuba!"
"Whoops, I'm supposed to get on a plane before I say that."

What exactly can someone do with a gun in an airport terminal that they can't do with a gun in a bookstore, a coffee shop, a mall, or a bus? What is this "grim mockery of security considerations" the author speaks of?

Is there any way to prevent a team of 5 to 10 trained terrorists from getting to an airplane and getting it off the ground? How many armed security personnel are there at airports, and how fast could they react to something like that?

All you can do is move the security checkpoints to the terminal entrances. They'd still have the same problems. Terrorists intent on getting to a plane are going to have to get past the searches one way or another.

here's a link to the article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40804-2004Oct17.html
 
Oh My God!

Armed parked cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hide the women and children...................

Bring in the pets. Its not safe to be outside.....................


AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The end of the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
In the post-Sept. 11 world, that's irresponsible and dangerous.

Zactly. Leaving those things locked in cars when they should be available in case of a highjack is irresponsible and dangerous.
 
Is there any way to prevent a team of 5 to 10 trained terrorists from getting to an airplane and getting it off the ground?

Yeah, let us leave the guns on for the whole plane ride.

Infact, MANDATE that only responsible, armed people be permitted to travel by air :)

That's right, NO TICKET WITHOUGHT YOUR GLOCK! ;D)
 
In my younger days I was known to strut occasionally now I kinda waddle, can't remember ever sashaying.

Is there any way to prevent a team of 5 to 10 trained terrorists from getting to an airplane and getting it off the ground
Having a terminal full of armed citizens probably wouldn't hurt
 
the parking lots may be loaded with deadly weapons. How comforting is that? It's even worse in Virginia's other airports, where people can bring guns inside the terminals


I find that mildly comforting, but I also find it dismal that these poor firearms are locked in a dark lonely trunk with no owner to love them.
 
Remember, pre-'63-ish you could legally walk on board an aircraft with your gun on.

They didn't seem to fall out of the sky much back then. :rolleyes:
 
I'm not registered at the Washington Post, so can't check this myself...

Can someone provide the e-mail address for letters to the Editor at the post? I think I might want to send in a comment or two on this one.

Maybe comment on all the alarmist language in this editorial. A single, legally-carried handgun somehow becomes an "arsenal." "Holster Heaven" implies huge numbers of people are doing this (not true.) "Sashay" implies recklesses and bravado.

People who legally carry firearms are statistically more law-abiding than the average person. They are "the good guys". A legal gun owner is not going to hijack a plane or hold up the terminal. Its those pesky bad guys with ILLEGAL firearms you have to watch out for.

A legal firearm locked in a car is no more dangerous than a brick. There needs to be a criminal attached to the trigger before any danger exists. Etc., etc.

The editorial strongly implies that legal gun owners are the problem. Simply not true. The editorial is dangerous, in that it mis-directs attention from the true problem to a non-existant threat.
 
i waddle. like a fat duck. and hey! whats wrong with sitting down to pee?? do you know how hard it is to read while standing up? :D
 
I bet you could sashay with this one:
DDA%20CS%20Fuscia.jpg
 
For Dave R:

Letters to the Editor

Editorial Policy

Letters must be exclusive to The Washington Post, and must include the writer's home address and home and business telephone numbers. (Letters via regular mail should also be signed.) Because of space limitations, those published are subject to abridgment. Although we are unable to acknowledge those letters we cannot publish, we appreciate the interest and value the views of those who take the time to send us their comments.

Letters Via E-Mail

Send e-mail letters to [email protected]. Do not send attachments; they will not be read.

Letters Via Regular Mail

Letters should sent to:

Letters to the Editor
The Washington Post
1150 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20071
 
Remeber Virginians: You can love your guns, just don't "love" your guns.;)

I'm from Texas and when I'm packin' I tend to saunter. (Makes my spurs jingle.)
 
Sashay? SASHAY?! We need some input from the Pink Pistol members on if that's what they do when they carry.

Some of the Pinks probably swagger, some sashay, and some mince. Don't matter to me ;-)

Now, some of the Second Amendment Sisters, I'll bet they sashay!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top