Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

ATF, "non-sporting," and publishing emails to them

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by leadcounsel, May 16, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. leadcounsel

    leadcounsel member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,365
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    :fire:I received an email from a watchgroup stating that the ATF had published my email to them, along with the emails of hundreds of other people and any personal information they disclosed.

    What an underhanded group!:fire:
     
  2. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,940
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    I wouldn't expect better.

    But what is the "non-sporting" term in your title referring to?
     
  3. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,524
    Sounds like your name is now on "the list".
     
  4. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,351
    Location:
    South Western, OK
  5. azmjs

    azmjs member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Sunny Phoenix
    Where are the emails published?
     
  6. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,351
    Location:
    South Western, OK
    Se the link in my post above. Scroll down to the bottom, on the left hand side is a link to the list.
     
  7. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    Last edited by a moderator: May 16, 2011
  8. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    Oh, and I noticed there are alot of 'spam' and Cut-N-Paste responses in there
    weirdly enough, they all seemed Anti-Gun....
     
  9. merlinfire

    merlinfire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    A lot of form emails in there....yeah it seems the anti-gun groups got mobilized for this. Didn't even care enough to customize the email: probably because they wouldn't know what to say besides "GUNS BAD, GUNS KILL, ME HATE GUNS"
     
  10. merlinfire

    merlinfire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    And, sadly, some emails for "our side" that were not the level-headed emails I was hoping for. You can't honestly expect that a person reading an email calling their employer out of control and calling for the elimination of their job will take such a response seriously.
     
  11. coltsfreak18

    coltsfreak18 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2010
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    The patron state of shooting stuff
    I too noticed that. Many of these people wanted to settle for compromise, not a full 2A right. These sorts of people will make the Hughes Amendment and the NFA infinitely more difficult to repeal in the long run.
     
  12. Gordon_Freeman

    Gordon_Freeman Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    433
    Location:
    Ravenholm
    This makes me a little paranoid. If you send a pro second amendment message to a government agency, could they make it difficult for you to pass a NICS background check when buying firearms?
     
  13. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,960
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Folks, it is vitally important that we learn what the processes are in government instead of thrashing around wildly.

    Like every other government agency that has a public comment period for anything that impacts a regulation they are OBLIGATED by law to open a comment period, publish those comments and to fully attribute them. This validates the comments as being real. They even publish the spam, repetitions, and outright nutty stuff to avoid the accusations of sifting comments. Anything from a source that isn't attributable isn't included. Anyone that is upset by this just doesn't understand how the process works.

    We had a thread running on the comment period and dissected the results of it.

    By March 6 there were 516 pages of comments on the so-called "shotgun study" and not a single page published supported the study! Now, 41 of those entries were spam, 4 of them were just nutty with no value, one was blank, but the rest opposed the basis, "science" and conclusions of the "study". I doubt that the nature of the comments will shift much by the time all the comments are published.

    I'm proud to have received this in my email and look forward to having my email published with everyone else that made the minuscule effort to participate. We should be ashamed if more THR members don't.-

     
    Last edited: May 16, 2011
  14. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    I got mine too HSO
    guess it's worth having some extra spam in the ol inbox
     
  15. Animal Mother

    Animal Mother Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    569
    Location:
    Southeast
    I'm fine with my email being published, if there is a list, I'm already on it. I hold an FFL 03 and a CCW License. I'm a member of the NRA, GeorgiaCarry.org, have contributed to the SAF, I write my congressmen every time lame-brain legislation comes up, and have sent comments to the ATF every time theres a open comment period on something gun related. I'm glad my email wasn't just dropped off in the trash and so that there can be no mistaking how the public feels about this. I just wish we had more people willing to stand up for their rights, I was a bit embarrassed that we only had 500+ pages of responses. If we all stood up and let our voices be heard - and put money where our mouth is - anti-gun legislation would never gain any traction in this country, it would truly become the third rail of politics.
     
  16. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,960
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Bulls-eye!

    At least the OP made the effort to send in a comment even if he didn't fundamentally understand the process.

    Most people would rather rant on the internet instead of making even the minimal effort of contributing a comment to something that will impact regulations or would rather shrink from the opportunity to be heard in fear of being "on some list" (which if they think that way probably should think they're on one for ranting here:rolleyes:).

    If everyone here had sent in a cogent comment on the "study" and would do so every time a comment period opened on RKBA issues the message to the government would be clear and visible to everyone.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page