Be Nice To Your Doctor

Status
Not open for further replies.
My doctor and his main nurse are gun owners. Shes from Texas! So are the 2 eye doctors we go to. Our old dentist was, our current one I don't know but to here him talk about whats going on he certainly seems pro gun. So I'm not worried about O'minions in white coats.
 
Howard J,

That's not accurate. The EA that POTUS just trooped out only is for Social Security recipients and it isn't the doctors reporting whether someone is competent to manage their affairs, but the Social Security Administration. That's bad enough, but it is nothing like what you thought.

You have to do your homework on stuff like this.
 
I just pass on what i Read----it don't worry me because I know the liberal
Democrats on here will show me the way-----:):):)
 
HOWARD J said:
I just pass on what i Read----it don't worry me because I know the liberal
Democrats on here will show me the way-----
I'm far from a liberal Democrat, I'm just a guy who thinks ignorant partisan hackery makes our side look bad.
 
"According to advice I have had from the police directly, when the condition has been resolved/treated, you can get the guns/FAC back."
I would love to see the figures on that in a country like England. Our own Los Angeles Police Department is somewhat notorious for, let's be honest here, outright stealing firearms with regularity. Often 'losing' them when ordered to finally present the items, no less.

I suspect it is hardly unique to our country.

TCB
 
I recently changed doctors and was asked to fill out a questionnaire. It had these 2 questions; Do you have guns in your household? Are the guns safely stored in a locked location? I drew a line through the questions and wrote N/A next to it. The doctor never even mentioned it.
That's funny because I did exactly the same thing and got exactly the same reaction!
 
Here's the actual change without the spin-

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-01-06/html/2015-33181.htm

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

45 CFR Part 164


Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Privacy Rule and the National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS)

AGENCY: Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health and Human
Services.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS or ``the
Department'') is issuing this final rule to modify the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule to
expressly permit certain HIPAA covered entities to disclose to the
National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) the identities
of individuals who are subject to a Federal ``mental health
prohibitor'' that disqualifies them from shipping, transporting,
possessing, or receiving a firearm. The NICS is a national system
maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to conduct
background checks on persons who may be disqualified from receiving
firearms based on Federally prohibited categories or State law. Among
the persons subject to the Federal mental health prohibitor established
under the Gun Control Act of 1968 and implementing regulations issued
by the Department of Justice (DOJ) are individuals who have been
involuntarily committed to a mental institution; found incompetent to
stand trial or not guilty by reason of insanity; or otherwise have been
determined by a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority to
be a danger to themselves or others or to lack the mental capacity to
contract or manage their own affairs, as a result of marked subnormal
intelligence or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease.
Under this final rule, only covered entities with lawful authority to
make the adjudications or commitment decisions that make individuals
subject to the Federal mental health prohibitor, or that serve as
repositories of information for NICS reporting purposes, are permitted
to disclose the information needed for these purposes.
The disclosure
is restricted to limited demographic and certain other information
needed for NICS purposes. The rule specifically prohibits the
disclosure of diagnostic or clinical information, from medical records
or other sources, and any mental health information beyond the
indication that the individual is subject to the Federal mental health
prohibitor.

DATES: Effective date: This final rule is effective on February 5,
2016.

covered entities with lawful authority to make the adjudications or commitment decisions that make individuals subject to the Federal mental health prohibitor, or that serve as repositories of information for NICS reporting purposes, are permitted to disclose the information needed for these purposes. "permitted to" isn't required to and the physician isn't the lawful authority wrt adjudications or commitment decisions.
 
With the HIPPA regulations being what they are now, wouldn't the doctor be in violation of those regs if he divulged "priviledged information" to anybody that you had not "authorized" to receive that information?
 
The administration is working the idea that medical information isn't released when the SSI tells NICS a recipient isn't competent since it isn't a specific medical information exchange, just that the individual doesn't meet the competency requirements for NICS.

There's also exception in HIPAA for a physician to report to law enforcement under specified circumstances that include that a patient is a danger to themselves or other.http://www.ndaa.org/ncpca_update_v16_no4.html
 
I don't see anything much different from my post #1 to your last paragraph where you say a physician may report a person that is a danger----A PERSON CAN BE REPORTED
 
I see part of Obamas gun control is to have your doctor report YOU ...

HIPAA was passed by Congress in 1996 and included the law enforcement exception.

Obama took office in 2009.

The HIPAA law enforcement exception was put in place during the Bush administration.
 
Are you happy now ?
You finally got the last word & showed Obama is not as bad as I think he is (no
further comment)
H
 
HIPAA was passed by Congress in 1996 and included the law enforcement exception.

Obama took office in 2009.

The HIPAA law enforcement exception was put in place during the Bush administration.
See? It's Bush's fault!
A piece of legislation passed late in Clinton's first term is enacted by Bush.

I tell ya', it's a conspiracy and they are all in it together! ;)
 
Ohhh, Obama's about as bad as we'd see (short of Clinton), but the facts matter more than hype or hysteria. We waste time spinning over hype where we could be using the facts to focus and fight the Antis.
 
These are some odd and unsourced claims being made; hats off to those using patience and skepticism to root out fact from parroted fiction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top