Drizzt
Member
Charleston Daily Mail
February 14, 2003, Friday
SECTION: News; Pg. P1D
LENGTH: 528 words
HEADLINE: Bear hunts send wrong message
BYLINE: John McCoy
BODY:
AGAINST all expectations, West Virginia's bear hunters enjoyed a record-breaking season this past fall.
They'd better enjoy it while it lasts.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm convinced that bear hunting - at least as it's currently practiced in the Mountain State - might just be an endangered pastime. The bears themselves are anything but endangered. Division of Natural Resources biologists say the statewide population has risen to more than 10,000 and is still growing.
Interest in hunting is solid, too. And as bears become more available, that interest could actually grow.
The potential problem, as I see it, lies in the way hunters pursue the animals.
Hunters who use firearms almost always use dogs. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that approach. Hunting with dogs is a time-honored tradition, and the dogs allow hunters to find bears much more easily.
If dogs were used today the way they were back when those traditions were established, no one would have any problems with the practice. Hunters would turn out their dogs and follow them on foot as they tracked their quarry.
But that isn't the way it's done today. The more - uh - "enthusiastic" bear hunters equip their dogs with radio transponders and GPS locators, and use all-terrain vehicles to keep pace with their dogs.
All those practices are perfectly legal. One could also argue that they're ethical, too, because they allow the hunters to more quickly find and shoot any bears their hounds might tree. Quick kills reduce the bears' torment, and they reduce the chance that bears might choose to fight their way out and kill a bunch of dogs.
The problem with the modern approach lies in the public's perception of it. The public doesn't see a bunch of hunters and dogs chasing a bear; they see the civilian equivalent of an armored cavalry division, four-wheeling over hill and dale with every electronic convenience locked in on a fleeing bruin.
The perception problem isn't restricted to firearm-and-hound hunters, either. Bowhunters are creating a public-relations nightmare of their own by shooting bears over bait.
Last fall, bowhunters bagged 725 of the record 1,335 bears killed. I figure at least 650 of them took those arrows while they were lapping up jelly doughnuts from bait sites.
Baiting bears is illegal under West Virginia law. But deer baiting isn't. Bowhunters are skating around the rules by setting up deer-bait sites that contain doughnuts, fish guts, and other bear delicacies.
The tide of public opinion hasn't yet swung against bear hunters. West Virginians still believe that the best way to control black-bear populations is to hunt the animals.
But for opinion to remain on hunters' side, people must be reassured that bear hunts are being conducted under fair-chase rules.
Mechanized, electronically assisted assaults on bears need to be curtailed. Laws need to be rewritten.
As for baiting - if DNR officials want to legalize bear-baiting and can make a case that it's biologically necessary for population control, fine.
But continuing the pretense that baiting isn't occurring simply because it's illegal is a farce.
February 14, 2003, Friday
SECTION: News; Pg. P1D
LENGTH: 528 words
HEADLINE: Bear hunts send wrong message
BYLINE: John McCoy
BODY:
AGAINST all expectations, West Virginia's bear hunters enjoyed a record-breaking season this past fall.
They'd better enjoy it while it lasts.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm convinced that bear hunting - at least as it's currently practiced in the Mountain State - might just be an endangered pastime. The bears themselves are anything but endangered. Division of Natural Resources biologists say the statewide population has risen to more than 10,000 and is still growing.
Interest in hunting is solid, too. And as bears become more available, that interest could actually grow.
The potential problem, as I see it, lies in the way hunters pursue the animals.
Hunters who use firearms almost always use dogs. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with that approach. Hunting with dogs is a time-honored tradition, and the dogs allow hunters to find bears much more easily.
If dogs were used today the way they were back when those traditions were established, no one would have any problems with the practice. Hunters would turn out their dogs and follow them on foot as they tracked their quarry.
But that isn't the way it's done today. The more - uh - "enthusiastic" bear hunters equip their dogs with radio transponders and GPS locators, and use all-terrain vehicles to keep pace with their dogs.
All those practices are perfectly legal. One could also argue that they're ethical, too, because they allow the hunters to more quickly find and shoot any bears their hounds might tree. Quick kills reduce the bears' torment, and they reduce the chance that bears might choose to fight their way out and kill a bunch of dogs.
The problem with the modern approach lies in the public's perception of it. The public doesn't see a bunch of hunters and dogs chasing a bear; they see the civilian equivalent of an armored cavalry division, four-wheeling over hill and dale with every electronic convenience locked in on a fleeing bruin.
The perception problem isn't restricted to firearm-and-hound hunters, either. Bowhunters are creating a public-relations nightmare of their own by shooting bears over bait.
Last fall, bowhunters bagged 725 of the record 1,335 bears killed. I figure at least 650 of them took those arrows while they were lapping up jelly doughnuts from bait sites.
Baiting bears is illegal under West Virginia law. But deer baiting isn't. Bowhunters are skating around the rules by setting up deer-bait sites that contain doughnuts, fish guts, and other bear delicacies.
The tide of public opinion hasn't yet swung against bear hunters. West Virginians still believe that the best way to control black-bear populations is to hunt the animals.
But for opinion to remain on hunters' side, people must be reassured that bear hunts are being conducted under fair-chase rules.
Mechanized, electronically assisted assaults on bears need to be curtailed. Laws need to be rewritten.
As for baiting - if DNR officials want to legalize bear-baiting and can make a case that it's biologically necessary for population control, fine.
But continuing the pretense that baiting isn't occurring simply because it's illegal is a farce.