As I said before, I have owned a Bersa Thunder pistol, purchased NIB.
On two separate occasions this pistol suffered breakages that rendered the gun inoperable. That pistol was broken most of the time I had it. The run around which I endured for the warranty was more than I could endure. In the end I cannibalized parts from another Bersa with a cracked frame that my local gun smith had on hand just so that I could sell it. I later found out from that same gun smith that one of those replaced parts broke again.
I stand by my suggestion that for the money, a Makarov is a far better choice. I own two of these as well: an East German Mak as well as a Bulgarian Mak. Both of which I purchased for under $250. I also own a 1969 and a 1972 Polish Radom P-64 which I consider a better made pistol...despite their atrocious triggers. Both of these cost less me than $200 each.
Micheal T, you and I have gone around on the subject on other forums. I was banned from one particular bersa forum and all of my posts deleted after I posted less than rave reviews, which, as I recall included PM's. I was accused of being a bersa hater out on a crusade but I was only providing my personal, if only anecdotal, experiences with my bersa. So for those of you who demand "proof" of bersa forums being slightly biased, you'll have to take my word for it...take it or leave it.
However, many threads can be found on other forums about bersa quality. Here is just one interesting thread (
that I did not participate in) which some of you may or may not be inclined to read:
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=268896&highlight=comments+on+bersa