A good gunsmith can fix just about any trigger on any of these pistols. The sloppiness is there for a reason. Like I said, I have a S&W 659 and it purposely has slop so that the trigger can be depressed a certain amount without firing, even when cocked. In stressful situations, you're not supposed to touch the trigger, but at the time the gun was designed, police were taught to put their fingers on the trigger. I like the play in my S&W trigger and wouldn't get rid of it if I could. People are subject to all sorts of twitches and such, and combat autos are not supposed to be range guns.
Glocks, in my opinion, are not great combat pistols because they have zero tolerance for human error. Accidental discharges with the Glocks are astronomical and I've seen it happen on ranges. Get in a charged situation and it only becomes worse. Just compare the accidental discharge rate of agencies and departments that use Glock with those that use other weapons.
I have an AMT Lightning with a Clark trigger (see my thread), and it has no play. You touch the trigger and it goes bang. My Ruger auto doesn't. It has slop. If I have to use one for self defense, guess which one I'll choose.
I can empty my 659 as rapidly as any Glock out there, but I think it's an inherently safer gun to use in self defense than any Glock. I also don't particularly like striker-fired pistols and greatly prefer hammers. Still, people have different views.
.