Best Powder for Heavy .357 Magnum Loads

Status
Not open for further replies.

GunAdmirer

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
418
Location
Greater D/FW Texas
I am going to be loading 180 grain cast and XTP HP bullets for hunting soon. I want to reach between 1200-1300 fps. Some reloading books specify 2400, IMR4227, N110 or H110 powders for heavy loads. What powder is best for heavy loads like these in your experience? I do NOT want to do anything beyond published load data.
 
I prefer H110, but 2400 would work great, too.
Matter of fact, they would prolly all work fine, it's a matter of preference.
 
My two most used powders have been 2400 and N-110. I have started trying H 110 but it is so fine it leaks a bit past the measure plate.

Overall the Viht powder wins - so clean and great metering - but regretably a major cost penalty. I guess 2400 is a good way to go - price not too bad and it'll get you up to some good and safe velocities, per published data. I would suggest a fairly aggressive roll crimp - just seems to help these slower powders get of the mark better - and maybe a tad less unburned particles - for which, at least in early days - the 2400 was worst.

There is a load for .357 and 180's that uses a very full case load of Blue Dot - but I won't give figures. It was fine in a bud's Blackhawk but I remember it rather ''stretched the envelope''! :p
 
H110 works for me. I've heard good things about N-110, but this was after buying 8lbs of H110. I'm still trying to use that up. :)

I've never been satisfied with the performance of 2400.

Chris
 
If I am trying to load max loads in .357 I use either H110 or AA#9. They have proven to me, over a chronograph, to provide the highest possible velocities while staying within the SAAMI pressure limits.
 
Even though I've used 2400 for heavy loads in 357s and 44s for years, nowadays I'm leaning more and more towards WW296. It seems a little cleaner and being a spherical powder, it flows nicely through a powder measure. The charts show somewhat higher velocities with WW296 than 2400, but I haven't run any side by side chronograph tests.

One bad thing about WW296 - Many reloading manuals warn against going below minimum listed loads and Winchester warns against reducing loads at all. And, it requires magnum primers.
 
I've been using 110 and #9, but just bought a pound of Lil'gun to try. With heavy bullets it's supposed to give higher velocities at lower pressures. Ideal if it works.
 
I love Lil’Gun. I have been using it to load .357, .44 Mag, and .45 Colt (Ruger Blackhawk) cartridges and am very pleased with the results. One of the nicest things I have found is that it meters very well. I am not sure what a heavy load is to you, but I have been using the data available from the Hodgdons website and it is peppy enough for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top