mike1966ga
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 44
we have always been taught that revolvers are better for new shooters than autos. safer, simpler, etc. my question is why?
My first handgun was a glock 17 back in 1988, loved it, shot the crap out of it, no problems, my second was a SA blackhawk in .44 cal. loved it, shot the crap out of it, no problems.
other than having to rack the slide to chamber a round on the glock (not exactly brain surgery) not a hole lot of diffrence tween the two.
well you might say that it would be eaiser to maintain the relvover, but to that I say, I have seen pictures of the workings of some relvolvers that would give a swiss watch maker a run for his money
anyway, hope everybody has a great day
mike1966ga
My first handgun was a glock 17 back in 1988, loved it, shot the crap out of it, no problems, my second was a SA blackhawk in .44 cal. loved it, shot the crap out of it, no problems.
other than having to rack the slide to chamber a round on the glock (not exactly brain surgery) not a hole lot of diffrence tween the two.
well you might say that it would be eaiser to maintain the relvover, but to that I say, I have seen pictures of the workings of some relvolvers that would give a swiss watch maker a run for his money
anyway, hope everybody has a great day
mike1966ga