Bi-Partisan Bill Introduced to Restore the Second Amendment Rights of D.C. Residents

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
95
Thursday, July 31, 2008

http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=11372

Fairfax, VA -- Today, in a bi-partisan effort, Congressman Travis Childers, Congressmen John Dingell, John Tanner, Mike Ross and Mark Souder, along with 47 of their colleagues, introduced the Second Amendment Enforcement Act (H.R. 6691). This critical legislation overturns D.C.'s recently enacted emergency laws that continue to defy the recent Supreme Court ruling by continuing to restrict District of Columbia residents' right to self-defense. This National Rifle Association-backed bill is needed to enforce the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.


On June 26, the U. S. Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that "the District's ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense." The Supreme Court clearly stated that handguns are constitutionally-protected arms because they are commonly used, are typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, are considered by the American people to be the quintessential self-defense weapon, are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home and are the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep and use for protection of home and family.


The Second Amendment Enforcement Act will:


* Repeal the District's ban on semi-automatic handguns. Semi-automatic pistols have been the most commonly purchased handguns in the United States over the last 20 years, and therefore a ban on those firearms is unconstitutional as decided by Heller;


* Restore the right of self-defense by repealing the requirement that firearms be disassembled or secured with a trigger lock in the home;


* Repeal the current D.C. registration system that requires multiple visits to police headquarters; ballistics testing; passing a written test on D.C. gun laws; fingerprinting; and limiting registration to one handgun per 90 days. The current system is unduly burdensome and serves as a vehicle for even more onerous restrictions; and


* Create a limited exemption to the federal ban on interstate handgun sales by allowing D.C. residents to purchase handguns in Virginia and Maryland. Currently there are no firearms dealers in the District of Columbia, and the federal ban prohibits residents from purchasing handguns outside of the District; therefore, District residents have no means of purchasing handguns.
 
Mayor Fenty is probably (secretly) overjoyed. Now he can blame the District's crime problem on the Congress.
 
Something tells me Fenty will just disregard the law and reinstate the ban. He's not gonna stop flouting authority until the gangbangers kill him.
 
We as law abiding firearms owners should write these guys and give them a pat on the back for having some intelligent initiative...hey, it doesnt happen that often ya know!!
 
Pelosi opposes gun bill but may allow vote

Pelosi opposes gun bill but may allow vote

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she personally opposes a bill loosening the District of Columbia’s gun laws, but that does not mean she will block it from coming to the floor.

“I want to see the particulars,” Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday. “Then we’ll see what comes to the floor or doesn’t come to the floor.”


The bill, designed to head off a showdown between the National Rifle Association and conservative House Democrats, was introduced Thursday, with roughly 50 Democratic co-sponsors, according to congressional sources.

The bill’s lead sponsors are to be three of the Democrats’ most vulnerable members from conservative districts – Reps. Travis Childers (D-Miss.), Jason Altmire (D-Pa.) and Don Cazayoux (D-La.).

The bill, to be numbered H.R. 6691, would repeal the district’s ban on semi-automatic pistols, the requirement that handguns be registered, and allow District residents from traveling to Virginia or Maryland to buy guns. The District currently forbids importing guns, and there are no registered gun dealers with shops in Washington.

Rep. Mark Souder (D-Ind.), who introduced a discharge petition to try to force Democrats to support a similar bill, is also expected to be a co-sponsor.

The deal was negotiated with the powerful gun-rights group by Reps. John Dingell (D-Mich.), Mike Ross (D-Ark.) and John Tanner (D-Tenn.).

The details were hammered out Thursday in a meeting between Pelosi, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and lawmakers backing the bill. Supporters say they have been given a commitment of a vote by mid-September.

Souder’s discharge petition sought to bring a bill by Ross to bring a D.C. gun-rights bill directly to the floor, bypassing the committee where it was languishing.

Supporters are building on a June Supreme Court decision rejecting the District’s decades-old gun law as unconstitutional. They believe District officials, who disliked the ruling, were dragging their feet and failing to fully implement the ruling.

The NRA officials had threatened to use House members’ willingness to sign the discharge petition in its scoring for this year’s election. Conservative Democrats who didn’t sign it, most of them members of the Blue Dog Coalition, risked losing their “A-plus” ratings.

The compromise with the NRA is designed to remove pressure on Democrats to sign the discharge petition, which had 164 signatures as of Wednesday.
 
Great idea

But I doubt it will go through unless the liberals can show it as proof of their concern for the American people and their rights. They would be able to proudly point out that they too are pro 2nd amendment.
 
I wrote my congressman last night. Get those letters out! I've worked for my congressman and I can tell you that they DO pay attention. A dozen letters can make a difference and 50 might as well be a mandate from God for most of them. Especially if you have a congressman that kinda leans conservative/pro-2nd anyway.

John
 
Something tells me Fenty will just disregard the law and reinstate the ban. He's not gonna stop flouting authority until the gangbangers kill him.

Why in the world would gangbangers want to kill him? After all, he is one who is protecting them, and making sure that the gangbangers will not get hurt by their victims. Gangbangers may be violent and crude but they are still human, and they are aware of who treats them "good", and they likely view Mayor Fenty as their King and would even lick his boots in return for more strict gun bans in DC.
 
Quote:
Pelosi opposes gun bill but may allow vote

So Pelosi supports people violating a SCOTUS decision? Hmm....interesting.

This could be a very good thing come november. It may be used as campaign fodder to help in toss-up races to oppose the democratic candidate on the basis that their party leader is using their majority to block enforcement of Supreme Court rulings... Basically it would be one of those "We get that your particular congress critter with a D next to his name isn't so bad, however, the number of D's keep Pelosi as speaker and as long as she's there your freedoms are at stake." Especially when a vote she has a good chance at losing is being denied. What was it someone once said about delayed justice???

Wouldn't it be cool if there was a major push back our way in a big way?



Oh well,
 
I humbly disagree with the consensus on this. If Congress does this:

1) We lose one of our best talking points. Should the D.C. crime rate remain stagnant (which it will) the antis will use this as proof that more guns do not help... and therefore, must hurt. RIght now, Fenty looks like a wacko, even to moderates. With this type of intervention, we'll make a martyr out of him.

2) Should Obama win in November, with perhaps dozens of senators and congressmen riding his coat-tails, do you want to see carry laws, shall-issue, stand your ground, castle doctrine, assault weapon bans, etc. all be changed and/or addressed on a national level?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top