All polymer guns, especially Glocks
I've never found a decent pistol that has a polymer frame. I've shot probably 40 to 50 different ones and they are all junk to me. I just don't like plastic guns.
Yeah, I don't like polymer guns, either. Just never spent the time to develop the feel for them. However...
I think the worst gun on the planet by far is anything made by Glock. I hear all the hype about what great guns they are but I have never found a good one yet. They are worthless beyond about 7 yards. I've never seen one hold better than an 8 to 10 inch pattern beyond that distance. They jamb [SIC] every 4 or 5 rounds (at least once every magazine full). They come all to pieces after about 2000 rounds. I've owned 3 different ones and traded each one off. I have never liked the feel of a Glock. They just don't sit well in a big hand. The angle of the grip feels wrong and I just can't get used to that feeling.
This statement is completely absurd. I mean, completely. In every way. Well, except for the "I have never liked the feel of a Glock," line and the grip angle gripes. I'll give you those. They are -- probably -- true.
Some of the most competent, consistent, insanely fast AND accurate shooters I've seen compete with Glocks. To say that the pistols in general aren't capable of a 8-10" group beyond 7 yards is simply laughable! To further say that they aren't reliable and won't last beyond 2000 rounds is simply a lie. Many of the USPSA and IDPA shooters who field Glocks are often putting well more than 2000 trouble-free rounds a month, and sometimes *PER WEEK* through them!
And there are about a million not quite so fast and maybe not so supremely accurate shooters who also use them pretty hard weekly/monthly in competitions. So it's not just the big name guys with tricked out guns. There are a lot of average Joe shooters out there pounding out the rounds, proving that the design is sound, accurate, and reliable.
Having said that, I don't own one, don't shoot them often, don't care for them, don't want one. But I can't believe someone would make such broadly false statements.
Please, if you are going to denigrate something use personalized terms that are irrefutable. To wit: "I don't like them." Or, "I've had them and traded them off." Or, "I don't think they're well made." Etc., etc. To say that they won't last more than 2000 rounds, they are borderline
negligently inaccurate, and they won't make it through half a magazine without a "jamb" -- and present these statements as fact -- makes you seem like a very poor source of information.
