Bloomberg proposes denying miniorities of their 2nd Amendment rights to save them

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
2,796
This is definitely racist. But Bloomberg is pointing out a fact that most everyone else is afraid to say. Young, miniorties are the majority of murderers and murder victims in the US. Although 95% seems a bit exaggerated. This fact is also ignored by anti-gunners because they want you to believe that the majority of murderers are white, Republican males who commit mass shootings with 'assault rifles' and 'high capacity magazines'.





http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/8/sughed-michael-bloomberg-suggests-disarming-minori/





Michael Bloomberg suggests disarming minorities to ‘keep them alive’

By Jessica Chasmar - The Washington Times - Sunday, February 8, 2015

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg reportedly argued Friday that guns need to be kept out of the hands of minorities in order to keep them alive....

While speaking at the Aspen Institute, Mr. Bloomberg, 72, said 95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: a male minority between the ages of 15 and 25, The Aspen Times reported.

Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands and keep them alive, the former three-term mayor said, according to The Times.
 
This guy has cojones, I'll say that much.

What is he proposing? An automatic background check denial during a gun sale if the race is anything but caucasian?

I guess if you're black you have no innate right to protect yourself.

This is truly staggering.
 
The truly horrific thing about this isn't the proposal itself, but that thousands of people will believe it's a good idea.
 
I'll bet that a good part of that "95%" is made up of repeat offenders -- "gang bangers" -- people who already have felony records, or are juveniles. These murders typically result from drug-dealer turf battles. Such people are already prohibited from legally obtaining firearms, but they have no difficulty getting them. So Bloomberg's proposal would do nothing to address the real problem, while simply penalizing the law-abiding. But it's indicative of Bloomberg's thinking. The man has arrogantly spent his career trying to save people from themselves. (For example, by outlawing super-size sodas, and requiring health care providers to report diabetics' blood-sugar test results to city authorities.) The road to Hell is always paved with good intentions.
 
*facepalm*

Give me a break...fantastically wealthy white guy goes on record saying 'take guns away from minorities to protect them' and there isn'a HUGE outcry from the left?

Not surprising, I suppose, if he can get this kind of response from his followers:

“While I’m sitting there waiting for him to introduce me, he said to his congregation, ‘You know, if every one of you stopped and frisked your kid before they went out at night, the mayor wouldn’t have to do it,’” Mr. Bloomberg said. “And so I knew I was going to be OK with that audience.”

THIS ought to be groomed into something which h could cause a huge backlash against him among minorities and the very people who form the backbone of much of the gun control crowd.
 
I find it frightening that someone is seriously suggesting arms be denied to American citizens based upon race. As someone already mentioned, what is even more frightening is many will agree. What's next? Religion? Income? Anyone who is a student of history can see where this is leading.
 
Meanwhile, he will still have his armed bodyguards with PDWs, even when he goes to his home in Bermuda where the police do not carry at all and the crime rate is miniscule.

Yes for me, not for thee...........What a hypocrite.
 
Last edited:
I was reading something over the weekend from the "Freakanomics" guys, Dubner and Levitt, and in discussing unexpected results they pointed out plainly and simply that, gun control doesn't influence crime rates because those who commit crimes are the least likely to be affected by gun control laws.

Now, having said that, I think M.B. was careful not to suggest making race or age a legal dis-qualifier. At least, I haven't seen anywhere where he asked outright for a change to federal gun laws to deny young black men their 2nd Amendment rights. It would be great if he did, because the obvious civil rights violation implied would make him even more ridiculous to even more people, and would drive some like the ACLU into pretzel-twists of self doubt and conflicting emotions.
 
What I would take from this "stance" on the part of Doomberg...

or any of his like minded individuals is this:

Let's get this modified though race oriented "for the children" issue through then once supported, enacted and acted upon - determine that it is racist and commence to apply it to EVERYONE ELSE out of fairness....

This guy is too attuned to not have this plan or one very close to it behind his comments.

13% now on "for the (black) children"....And the implied parent. The other 87% later just to be fair.

Always remember that their goal - NO MATTER WHAT IS SAID - is always 100% disarmament.

Todd.
 
If you want the media to make a big thing out of this proposal, you'll have to have it repeated (without attribution to Bloomberg) by someone like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, or Jeb Bush.

THAT would make headlines.
 
Perhaps the answer is requiring black gangbangers to pass a mandatory proficiency and fire discipline course. Then, they'll be more likely to actually hit their enemy instead of spraying crowds of bystanders and sending stray bullets into houses blocks away.
This course should be taught by old Sicilian and Jewish gangsters (if any are left these days), because if memory serves me, in their heyday these wiseguys only got the guy they were after during their "hits." Bystanders and "civilians" were generally pretty safe during the gang wars of yesteryear. ;)
 
If you want the media to make a big thing out of this proposal, you'll have to have it repeated (without attribution to Bloomberg) by someone like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, or Jeb Bush.

THAT would make headlines.

Precisely. We've already seen that. When the NRA proposed having armed responders in schools, there was media outrage over this barbaric, violence-inducing proposal. When the administration later proposed the same thing, it was a "common-sense" response to "gun violence." :banghead::banghead::banghead:
 
This is definitely racist. But Bloomberg is pointing out a fact that most everyone else is afraid to say. Young, miniorties are the majority of murderers and murder victims in the US. Although 95% seems a bit exaggerated. This fact is also ignored by anti-gunners because they want you to believe that the majority of murderers are white, Republican males who commit mass shootings with 'assault rifles' and 'high capacity magazines'.





http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/8/sughed-michael-bloomberg-suggests-disarming-minori/
meh, let bloomberg dig his own grave...
 
I'm not sure why I'm not getting the hoopla. If you skew his quote heavily you can maybe call it racist, but make no mistake that he means to take the guns away from everyone. I would be wary of getting behind what he said for the very reason he is being attacked in certain media outlets right now. There are a lot of new gun owners and they include women and minorities, people we should champion as the very people that need them the most to defend against strong assailants and the dangerous neighborhoods from which they can't escape economically.
 
The 13th richest person on the planet according to Forbes, 37.2 billion, wants to deny gun rights on an entire class of people, no matter what their background. Or so it seems. The overt racism is stunning.

I agree with just letting him talk. The hole he's digging will just get deeper.
 
Lets get the original Aspen Times piece up instead of the excerpted bit from "Washington Times"
http://www.aspentimes.com/news/14957190-113/michael-bloomberg-calls-colorados-decision-on-legal-pot-stupid said:
Three-term New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg harped on the importance of vocational education and blasted Colorado’s decision to legalize marijuana as stupid Friday evening before a sold-out crowd at the Aspen Institute.

When an audience member asked the 72-year-old Bloomberg about Colorado marijuana, he responded that it was a terrible idea, one that is hurting the developing minds of children. Though he admitted to smoking a joint in the 1960s, he said the drug is more accessible and more damaging today.

“What are we going to say in 10 years when we see all these kids whose IQs are 5 and 10 points lower than they would have been?” he asked. “I couldn’t feel more strongly about it, and my girlfriend says it’s no different than alcohol. It is different than alcohol. This is one of the stupider things that’s happening across our country.”

On education, Bloomberg said the U.S. should deliver the kind of schooling that will help people become self-sustainable and increase a sense of dignity. If a person has the option of going to Harvard or becoming a plumber, he said he would suggest thinking about the plumbing career.

“The Harvard graduate on average will never catch up to a plumber,” Bloomberg said. “Partially because the first four years — instead of spending $60,000, you make $60,000.”

Cities should create jobs that meet the skills of its residents, he said, not potential residents. In New York City, where $56 million tourists visit annually, Bloomberg said the hospitality and service industries are key. Though some might say those aren’t good jobs, he claimed that a waitress in the grand ballroom of the Waldorf Astoria Hotel makes $150,000 a year because of strong union negotiations. A waitress in a decent New York restaurant will make $50,000 to $60,000 a year, he said.

Bloomberg, who is now worth $36.6 billion, according to Forbes, said the poor in the U.S. need better education. By the end of his life, he said he’s going to write a book about why the poor remain poor.

“It’s always the poor that get screwed,” said the founder of Bloomberg L.P.

Moderator Jennifer Bradley, director of the Center for Urban Innovation at the Institute, then asked what the U.S. can do to get people out of poverty. Bloomberg responded that conventional wisdom points to education, but education isn’t going to help uneducated adults. Bradley later asked how government can offer basic fairness to the children “who have been failed.”

Bloomberg claimed that 95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: male, minority and between the ages of 15 and 25. Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands and keep them alive, he said.

“These kids think they’re going to get killed anyway because all their friends are getting killed,” Bloomberg said. “They just don’t have any long-term focus or anything. It’s a joke to have a gun. It’s a joke to pull a trigger.”

At one point, the former mayor brought up New York City’s stop-and-frisk practices, which gained national attention in 2011. Bloomberg said that during his last year in office, a minister at a Baptist church in Harlem invited him to speak.

“While I’m sitting there waiting for him to introduce me, he said to his congregation, ‘You know, if every one of you stopped and frisked your kid before they went out at night, the mayor wouldn’t have to do it,’” Bloomberg said. “And so I knew I was going to be okay with that audience.”
 
The story in the Aspen Times (Colorado) by Karl Herchenroeder, "Michael Bloomberg calls Colorado’s decision on legal pot stupid", 6 Feb 2015.
Addressing the Aspen Institute, Bloomberg was his usual self arrogantly offering the insight of a blind bat on a number of subjects.
But on topic for us:
Herchenroeder:
Bloomberg claimed that 95 percent of murders fall into a specific category: male, minority and between the ages of 15 and 25. Cities need to get guns out of this group’s hands and keep them alive, he said.
http://www.aspentimes.com/news/1495...-calls-colorados-decision-on-legal-pot-stupid

Donning my Carnac turban:

Answer: Practically none. Question: How many gangbangers buy their guns from legally regulated sources?

Answer: Practically all of them. Question: How many gangbangers buy their guns from illegal unregulatable sources--like black markets that would be stimulated by more legal gun control?

Answer: A minority of a minority. Question: How many minority young men are gangbangers?
 
Always remember that their goal - NO MATTER WHAT IS SAID - is always 100% disarmament.

Well, with Bloomberg, it's probably more like 99% disarmament, with the (much as it pains me to co-opt their language) 1% bad guys of the Occupy movement, like Bloomberg himself, exempted from restriction.
 
Well, I feel much safer just knowing all the thuggish looking youths that are over 26 years aren't any threat to me or my family, according to Bloomie.
 
He just doesn't get it.

The media will sweep it under the rug though. He'll just back up and punt, then bide his time for a bit.
 
The root of his statement is nothing that has not been said here. Address the big outlier of violence in this country if you really want to see results.

He is still focused on the guns, not on the violence and the causes of it. Because of that no improvement will come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top