apocryph
Member
I posted this in the other [Bloomberg in Wall Street Journal](http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=4656703#post4656703) thread, where it was apparently OT, so here's a new thread for my question.
Mayor Bloomberg of NYC got an editorial printed in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121478283640414407.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries) in which he re-iterates his gun-grabbing agenda, swaddled in the usual "common sense" rhetoric.
Mostly it's the usual stuff, but two of his wish list items were not familiar to me. Here's my post from the other thread:
I read this opinion piece yesterday, and found myself uttering the usual Bloomy-related expletives. However, he did mention two gun-grabber agenda items I am not familiar with. While I'm sure they're specious and misrepresented, I'm still curious what he's talking about. They are:
and
The first one, gun dealer "fire sales", seems very inconsistent with what I've heard of the way BATFE conducts itself with FFLs. Is what Bloomy says true (well, I'm sure it isn't, but you know what I mean)?
The second one, "terror gap", is so light on details and so heavy on scare tactics it can only be a brazen attack on gun rights, but what exactly is it? It's not the gun show "loophole", as that was the first item on his nanny-statist wish list. Surely he's not suggesting anyone on the no-fly list goes into NICS, is he? Or should I shut up lest he get more ideas...
Anyone have any ideas?
Mayor Bloomberg of NYC got an editorial printed in the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121478283640414407.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries) in which he re-iterates his gun-grabbing agenda, swaddled in the usual "common sense" rhetoric.
Mostly it's the usual stuff, but two of his wish list items were not familiar to me. Here's my post from the other thread:
I read this opinion piece yesterday, and found myself uttering the usual Bloomy-related expletives. However, he did mention two gun-grabber agenda items I am not familiar with. While I'm sure they're specious and misrepresented, I'm still curious what he's talking about. They are:
- End gun-dealer fire sales. If the federal government shuts down gun dealers for selling illegally, it nevertheless allows those dealers to sell off their inventory without conducting the background checks that it normally requires them to do. Imagine if a liquor store was shut down for selling to minors. Would anyone support a policy that would allow the owner to sell off all the remaining liquor without checking IDs? Of course not.
and
- Close the "terror gap." If the federal government can prevent a potentially dangerous person from getting on a plane, shouldn't it also be able to prevent that person from buying guns? Last year, the Bush administration endorsed a bill that will close the terror gap. Congress should make it law this year.
The first one, gun dealer "fire sales", seems very inconsistent with what I've heard of the way BATFE conducts itself with FFLs. Is what Bloomy says true (well, I'm sure it isn't, but you know what I mean)?
The second one, "terror gap", is so light on details and so heavy on scare tactics it can only be a brazen attack on gun rights, but what exactly is it? It's not the gun show "loophole", as that was the first item on his nanny-statist wish list. Surely he's not suggesting anyone on the no-fly list goes into NICS, is he? Or should I shut up lest he get more ideas...
Anyone have any ideas?