Bolt Carrier Group/Charging Handle Recommendation

Status
Not open for further replies.

tacstar

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
21
I'm in the process of an AR build & I was looking for a bolt carrier group/charging handle recommendation.

Some people are fond of the BCM Gunfighter charging handle & other people recommend nickel boron bolt carrier groups.

Has anybody had any experience with Bushmaster's bolt carrier group?
 
PSA keeps putting their premium (unmarked) BCG on sale for under $100. That comes pretty highly recommended.

Milspec Carpenter No. 158® steel bolt
Shot Peened Bolt
High pressure tested
Mag particle inspected
Chrome Lined Carrier (AUTO)
Chrome Lined Gas Key
Gas Key Hardened to USGI Specifications
Gas Key Grade 8 Hardened Fasteners
Gas Key Staked Per Mil-Spec
Tool Steel Extractor
Extractor Spring
Extractor O-ring Insert

Not Ni-Boron coated, but who cares?
 
PSA Premium, BCM, Ranier Arms, etc. I cant tell a visual difference between the BCM and PSA Premium and the specs are the same. Then again, I've never broken even the cheapest BCG... As for charging handle, I prefer the medium BCM gunfighter. Its big enough to grasp easy and small enough not to jab you while slung.
 
Fluff away ! That is the neat thing about AR's, they can be as "fluffy" or spartan as you like. Aim has an angle cut Black Nitride treated bolt carrier assembly for $100 and it is as good as they get for that little money (AIMBCGV2).
 
Buy features, not Brands. A good bolt carrier is the issue full auto M16 in at least military specification, at a minimum. Add surface treatments for extra protection. The gas key screws should be sufficiently staked to prevent loosening, the bolt MPI inspected, and it's good enough for combat. Literally.

More than that is for any specific reason the owner might choose, but "extra" reliability won't happen if a poor grade of ammo is constantly shot. The system is designed for full power military NATO ammo, not cheap bulk or rejected spec. Those cause far more stoppages than some want to believe.

That also goes to the charging handle. Milspec gets the job done, and has with very little change for over 45 years. If quality ammo is getting used, then the magazine is shot until it's empty, the bolt holds back, the operator changes mags, slaps the hold open button, the bolt chambers, and the rifle is back into battery. The charging handle only gets used to chamber the first round "in the wire" where it's being prepared to shoot.

Where the interest in uber grade handles comes from is competition shooting on 3Gun courses where a split second in elapsed time handling a malfunction under duress might drop someone in the standings. And that is who the handles are marketed to - none are issue, other countries using the AR15 haven't specified one they need, it's largely a matter of making something that will sell, not something that has demonstrated any critical need.

Build it and shoot it, then you discover any shortcoming that might come up for your special situation. But it does take shooting it to discover, not the marketing agenda or ego trolling that insists one specific type is required or you need to turn in your man card.

Over 7 million M16's and variants, over 20 million users since it was introduced, and the harsh reality is that ammo, mags, and operator error are the top three problems, not the gun.
 
I'm in the process of an AR build & I was looking for a bolt carrier group/charging handle recommendation.

Some people are fond of the BCM Gunfighter charging handle & other people recommend nickel boron bolt carrier groups.

Has anybody had any experience with Bushmaster's bolt carrier group?

If you are looking for a stand alone BCG/CH to build a rifle I would look for:

Bravo Company Manufacturing
Spikes Tactical

And that's as far as I would look, personally. There are of course plenty of other reasonable-to-good choices out there.

But not Bushmaster.

Carpenter 158 bolt, HPT, MPI, established/reputable company...those are the highlights.

The regular 'mil spec' plain aluminum CH is fine. I do like the larger latch of the BCM/VLTOR gunfighter options
 
I am using a hard-chrome Young Mfg. FA bolt in my PSA Dissipator build, and have nothing but good to say about it. I have had issues with the ejector on my phosphate bolt of the same manufacture, and will be talking to Young Mfg about it soon.

For charging handles, I recommend the Raptor charging handle hands-down. I really feel it's not just a slight improvement, but a very large one as it gives me the ability to charge from either side, and it's far more comfortable on my hands.
 
There is a difference between cheap and inexpensive.

That ^ is cheap.
I'd appreciate your expanding upon that statement, as I am a novice to the AR world and I'm following this thread very closely so I can decide upon a BCG. Is it not within a specified tolerance? Is the steel substandard? Do you mean cheap in quality or cheap in price?

Thanks! :)
 
I'd appreciate your expanding upon that statement, as I am a novice to the AR world and I'm following this thread very closely so I can decide upon a BCG. Is it not within a specified tolerance? Is the steel substandard? Do you mean cheap in quality or cheap in price?

Thanks! :)

It uses 9310 steel for the bolt instead of Carpenter 158. I've read people stating that 9130 is just as good if not better, and I've also read that Carpenter 158 has to be bought in larger quantities than 9310.

Carpenter 158 is the Mil-Spec material though.

otherwise that BCG seems to check most of the boxes

Shot peened, High pressure tested, magnetic particle inspected, staked gas key, upgraded extractor.
 
Last edited:
I have eight of the Aim BCG ((some 9310 some C158) and run them hard, they perform splendidly and that is first hand knowledge not what I have read.
 
Lb, thanks for the confidence on the AIM BCG. Waiting for the V2 black nitride C158 to arrive. Those sure sold out quickly!
 
I'd appreciate your expanding upon that statement, as I am a novice to the AR world and I'm following this thread very closely so I can decide upon a BCG. Is it not within a specified tolerance? Is the steel substandard? Do you mean cheap in quality or cheap in price?

Thanks! :)

9310 bolt material is a cost saving alternative. What you probably want to get is an HPT/MPI Carpenter 158 bolt. That is what is time tested and proven. It does cost more and I hear the minimum purchase quantity is large, so it is not uncommon for companies to save money by using something else. Depending on the usage the rifle sees it might not make a difference. Or it might.

The three most important components of an AR are the barrel, BCG, and FCG (aka trigger). The barrel is obvious, the BCG is the hardest working part of the gun (bolt lugs and area around the cam pin especially), and the FCG is critical for reliable primer ignition.
 
Personally I am fond of the BCM Med charging handle. I also have had good luck with their BCGs. Although I have never had a problem with "lowly" Rock River BCGs as far as that goes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top