Brady act teamed with Lautenberg is getting people killed. Time to repeal

Status
Not open for further replies.

gopguy

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,226
Location
S.W. Ohio
The Brady act teamed up with the Lautenberg Amendment is getting people killed. The is a fact easy to document. It used to be to take a right from people you had to be convicted of a felony. Now the accusation of violence is enough. If the Brady act is going to be expanded to deal with mental health records then the Lautenberg Amendment should be repealed.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/article4080.html
 
The is a fact easy to document.

Then how come nobody does?
Everything in this article is anecdotal.

I think what we need more than anything is names.
"Jim Brady" is a name, THE name being used to foist this garbage on the country.

We need a counter-name. Something with the same effect as "Willie Horton", "John Allen Muhammad", or "Michael Vick" - a name instantly associated with a concept... in this case, "person who couldn't get a gun and died for it".
 
Beatnik,You missed the point. The antis keep using the idiotic argument "if it only saves one life". I am showing it has cost people their lives and puts an old friend of mine in danger. The argument is bogus and demonstrating that was my goal. Lautenberg needs to be repealed.

You are asking for a study. Since the BATFE probably is not interested in doing a study which shows how many people who applied to buy a gun but were turned down because of a minor misdemenor, that thanks to Lautenberg made them Brady ineligible, eventually got them killed, such a thing probably won't happen. It is not in the BATFE's interest to talk about it.
 
Bonnie Elmasri,along with her two children, was mudered 24 hours into Wisconsins 48 hour waiting period,by her husband. She had a restraining order against him at the time. How does that one work.
 
God forbid anything happen to my old friend Connie. If something does I shall howl and l will do my best to make sure all will hear it.
 
Some garbage from the Brady Camp

Ten Really Stupid Reasons to Ban Guns By Bruce Gold

1. Guns are used in self-defense over 2 million times a year. However, this makes the attempted crime a “non-event,” which necessarily complicates the Police investigation. Without civilian ownership of guns, these Police investigations would not have been compromised. Civilians should leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to investigate following the crime’s completion.
2. Some .004 % (4/1000 of 1%) of guns are used in crime each year. This is way too high. All guns should be banned.
3. Guns are unnecessary. In 98% of civilian gun defenses, no shot is fired. If you are not going to fire a shot, you clearly don’t need a gun. This proves that the guns are unnecessary. Banning guns will prevent the seun necessary defenses.
4. Guns cause criminal migration. In tough gun law Washington [D.C.], violent crime rates are very high. This high crime rate is caused by the migration of criminals from gun havens like Virginia. This migration is caused by the criminal’s cowardly avoidance of armed householders and concealed carry civilians. This criminal migration is detrimental to helpless unarmed citizens in no gun areas and must be stopped. Guns should be banned everywhere.
5. Most gun crimes are committed by inner city gangs and drug dealers. These relatively small and geographically restricted groups consistently commit the majority of gun crimes, which usually peak as turf wars erupt over Drug War changes. The best way to prevent this is by denying guns to all law abiding people everywhere.
6. No woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder. The Police will protect them by investigating the crime after the fact. Remember, Police paperwork is all the protection anyone really needs.
7. Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. Good citizens should completely rely on the authorities. A failure to do so is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. Failure to completely and absolutely trust and depend on the authorities is excessive democracy and sends a bad message to children.
8. Guns owners engaging in self-defense are taking the law into their own hands. This is wrong. Only the Police and Criminals have the right to take the law into their own hands. It should be kept out of the hands of citizens.
9. Children and young people should remain ignorant about guns. Real guns and real gun knowledge dissipates the fantasies created by violent video games and TV. Ignorance once lost, can never be restored and needs to be protected.
10. Guns reduce people’s reliance on the Police and Government. This fosters a mistaken belief in “rights.” No person has the right to question authority. No person should be less then 100% dependent on authority. This is fundamental to social order. Banning guns will help to establish the Order the authorities want.
This is good?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top