• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Bulldog .44

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
1,263
Location
NYC
Does anyone have any experience with the Charter Arms Bulldog?
I saw the backpacker model in a gun store and was very impressed.
Is the gun durable?
Is the recoil manageable?
 
I have only one experience with a Charter Arms in .44 Special. I'm not a revolver type guy, so take this for what it's worth. The short version is I was overall impressed, but not overwhelmed.

Someone asked me to clean up a revolver they'd bought, they knew nothing about it other than the price was right and it was a .44. Turned out to be a somewhat neglected Charter Arms Bulldog with about a 3" barrel, if I remember correctly. Slight surface rust that I got out with oil and extra-fine steel wool. Internals had dried lube on them, I assume what had been applied at the factory. Bore was cruddy.

After cleaning it up, the surface rust was all but gone, the internals took some work to clean and re-lube, and the bore was permanently darkened a bit, but no pits. Chambers cleaned up O.K.

Test fired and re-cleaned, and here's the important part for potential owners. I don't like revolvers because they don't fit my hands well. This one, however, didn't beat me up. Not a pussycat, but entirely manageable. For someone who uses revolvers regularly, it would be a breeze.

ETA: Lockwork wasn't what you'd describe as "bank vault", but there was no noticeable play when the hammer was down and trigger to the rear. no signs of timing issues. It hit a coffee can more often than not at 10 yards, but the misses might have been my general unfamiliarity with revolvers.
 
I bought one a couple months ago and love it! The only problem that I have is my reloads have to be spot on to get the cylinder to close. I do not have any problem with them fitting in my 629, Ruger SBH and a case gauge. I have to make sure that they are pushed hard into the cylinder to close it. Did put some acrylic green paint on the front site to see it better.

I am shooting Lucky 13 200 gn bullets around 800 f/sec. Recoil is not much more than my 2" 38 with +P loads.

The gun locks up as tight as any S&W or Colt that I have owned and like the idea it comes with wood grips and ported. The trigger breaks on single action a little over 3 pounds.
 
I have one, like it, and it has given me no problems. 44 special is not a high-pressure cartridge, so recoil is pretty easy.
 
I used to own one. It was a fun gun to shoot, until it shot loose.

You see, Bulldogs aren't meant to be fired much. Therefore, I don't care for them. Not to mention that fact that the gun had to go back to the factory twice. I bought it new, and fired only standard pressure loads in it. Interesting guns, but just not up to any regular use.
 
Cooldill, I would agree with you on the older models. I have one that copied the 36 and it is not built like the newer Backpacker 44 Special. The lockup in the Backpacker is tight, very tight. I am hoping after another 100 to 150 rounds it will loosen up some.
 
Thanks.
I was handling the Backpacker model at my LGS and was impressed with it's lockup and finish, but the wooden grips would have to go.
But I like to shoot and am concerned about its durability.
 
The CA Bulldog was meant to be carried a lot and shot a little. It should be a good option, but there are better, like the S&W Model 696 which is heavier but more robust in construction. I'd make sure the CA you want is reliable, then have no worries.

I love the 44 Special, which when properly loaded, makes an excellent defensive carry gun. The 44 Special 200 gr Gold Dot Hollow Points are what I carry for serious social work in cold weather. The 44 Special does not need to expand to be effective, which is a major consideration if a perp is wearing a lot of layers of clothing in cold weather. Also, the recoil and muzzle blast are not excessive like the 357 Magnum, so firing it in an enclosed space or car should not be a problem.
 
They are great to carry. I will take the other posters' word for it that they were not made to withstand tens of thousands of rounds. Mine sure feels like an alloy frame to me.
 
Last edited:
I have 2 of the newer model s/s Bulldogs (purchased new in Summer 2014).

Comparing them to the 3"RB 629-1 that I bought NIB in Feb'89 is a little bit depressing ... but ... for what they are (concealable $350 bigbore revolvers), I have found them to be quite decent carry guns.

I carry them with my handloads, either 200gr GDs or 250gr Matt's Lead HPs, both running in the mid-800s. The recoil of both requires your full attention, but, to me, is not what I consider unpleasant.

I agree with Paladin7's assessment:
The CA Bulldog was meant to be carried a lot and shot a little.

While they are not the most robust of revolvers, they are covered by a lifetime warranty for CA.

I am pleased with both of my Bulldogs.
 
Cooldill, I would agree with you on the older models. I have one that copied the 36 and it is not built like the newer Backpacker 44 Special. The lockup in the Backpacker is tight, very tight. I am hoping after another 100 to 150 rounds it will loosen up some.
Good. That is a stainless steel framed gun, correct? The standard .44 Bulldogs have aluminum alloy frames. Not so great on the whole "longevity" thing. I should mention mine was 2015 production, so not one of the old ones. It still went out of time.
 
Keep a close watch on the screws. They will shoot loose. Loc tite is a very good idea. If you do not check them frequently and shoot the gun a lot you will lose a screw.
 
Last edited:
I have never understood the reason why in almost every single discussion of the Charter .44 someone ALWAYS has to point out that Berkowitz used one. Who cares? He could have used a Colt or a S&W or Ruger.
 
I don't care and honestly I don't see why to bring up a notorious murderer if we're on The High Road.
 
I don't care and honestly I don't see why to bring up a notorious murderer if we're on The High Road.
I agree. Nobody brings up Newtown, the Colorado theater shootings, or many others when speaking about AR-15s. No reason to bring up the Bulldog when talking about that one loser.
 
There is also a "BackPacker" made by Charter Arms for Lew Horton. Is it a 44 Special 2.5", stainless steel frame, ported barrel and wooden grips. Lew Horton claims to only have 50 of them made.
 
I don't care and honestly I don't see why to bring up a notorious murderer if we're on The High Road.
Sorry if I offended anyone, but I can't scrub my memory. A .44 bulldog will always make me think of son of Sam. Same as a 6.5 Carcano makes me think of Lee Oswald. Oh and guess what a 1873 Springfeild makes think of? Bloody Indian wars.
I had no idea mentioning historical facts was not "High Road."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top