Bullets pierce shed near shooting range

Status
Not open for further replies.

Car Knocker

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
3,809
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
Bullets pierce shed near shooting range
By Nate Carlisle
The Salt Lake Tribune

Gale Peckham says the bullet holes behind him in the shed outside his Kearns home may have been caused by stray fire from the Impact Guns shooting range. The range has ceased fire since the holes appeared Nov 26. (Chris Detrick/The Salt Lake Tribune)

Gale Peckham says he was looking outside his kitchen window when he heard the second ping.
"We've been hit," he told his wife.
There are two bullet holes in Peckham's shed that he believes came from the firing range behind his house in Kearns.

The range's manager said he doesn't know whether the bullets came from the range, but has voluntarily ceased shooting there as the business ponders whether to renovate the range or turn it into retail space.
"We've been shooting here for five years with .50-caliber [Browning machine guns] and .30-06s and we don't know of a bullet ever escaping," said Clark Aposhian, the manager of Impact Guns, 4075 W. 4715 South.

Peckham, 51, and his wife say they've lived in their home in the 4000 West block of 4715 South for 28 years. The gun shop and firing range moved behind their home about five years ago. Peckham and his wife, Gay, said they can hear the gunshots from inside their home.

The business has changed owners a couple of times. The current owner purchased the business, formerly known as Totally Awesome Guns and Range, and changed its name to Impact Guns in September. Peckham said he doesn't know of a bullet ever escaping the range.

About 1 p.m. on Nov. 26, Peckham said, he was sitting in his kitchen when he heard a ping. Something hit the aluminum siding on the shed attached to his home. He suspected it was a bullet.
A minute later, Peckham claims, he heard a second hit. He called the range and told them to stop firing. Then he went to look at his shed.
On the outbuilding's north side are two holes about a half-inch in diameter. One is 6 feet 4 inches off the ground and the other is 6 feet 11 inches. Peckham reported the damage to the Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office.

Peckham has a photograph of Impact Guns' rear concrete wall, the one facing his house, that he said he took the day after his shed was hit. It shows two small holes in the range's concrete wall. Peckham said he noticed the holes the day his house was hit and thinks they're bullet holes, too.
On Monday, the higher hole in Impact Guns' wall appeared to have been patched. There was a piece of plywood covering where the lower hole appeared.

Aposhian said the business's owner was already planning to renovate the range to improve such things as handicap accessibility, lighting and the spectator area, and decided to close the range after Peckham reported his shed was hit.
Aposhian said the public has nothing to fear from the range.
"It will not reopen until we are 100 percent satisfied that nothing left our building or nothing can leave our building," he said.

Peckham doesn't think gun enthusiasts should be allowed to shoot at Impact Guns unless the range is moved underground.
"I don't care if they have a gun store there," Peckham said, "but I don't think they ought to have a shooting range above ground in a residential neighborhood."
[email protected]
 
"I don't care if they have a gun store there," Peckham said, "but I don't think they ought to have a shooting range above ground in a residential neighborhood."
I gotta agree, and whatever planner(s) approved the zoning need to be compelled to indemnify the owners for any economic losses.
 
'Course, if they're shooting .50 BMG, they should have a better bullet trap than a cinder block wall...
 
This is a rare case where the residential area appears to predate the firing range. It's hard to accuse the residents of the kind of underhanded activity that usually goes along with attempts at range closures.
 
It's hard to accuse the residents of the kind of underhanded activity that usually goes along with attempts at range closures.
Especially if they can prove that there are any projectiles leaving the range property.
 
R.H. Lee said:
I gotta agree, and whatever planner(s) approved the zoning need to be compelled to indemnify the owners for any economic losses.


Ah, in that neighborhood, I'm sure the residents are used to gunfire.
:neener:


I'm quite familiar with the shop and am friends with Aposhain. The houses predate the range.
I haven't been since it changed hands to Impact guns, I need to pay a visit soon.
 
There is a story that somebody in Spokane sued to stop the shooting at a club near his home, a club that has been in the river valley since, maybe, the Spanish American War. Well, a long time. Seems the judge tossed out the case when the address was read: XXXX Rifle Range Road.

Bart Noir
Yup, that's the road and it's all houses now.
 
My local indoor range, appropriately called "The Hole in the Wall," has bullet holes in the exterior wall behind the bullet trap. :uhoh:
 
Just to play gun-store advocate, has the home-owner found any bullets in his shed?

In other words, maybe he is making up the story to get rid of the range.
 
To echo the earlier post, there is a very high likelihood that if indeed the shed does have bullet holes in it, they came from other than the range. I worked this neighborhood for a few years and it is definitely one of the more prominent "knife and gun clubs" in the Salt Lake Valley.
 
A few years ago the Braintree Rod and Gun Club in Massachusetts got into trouble for rounds supposedly impacting a truck parked at the Associated Grocers headquarters nearby. Later I started doing courier runs for AG so I checked out the gun club, and I realized that someone would have to turn 90 degrees from the firing line and fire at least at a 45 degree angle to hit anything on AG property. Even if some idiot did make a shot like that, it's hardly the norm and could be prevented by putting a range officer on the line.

IIRC the investigation found the club not liable.

I also seem to remember a different story about a ticked off resident bringing a "bullet" into the local PD, claiming it was fired into his home from a nearby range. The "bullet" was a complete, unfired cartridge. If only all investigations were that easy.
 
That reminds me of a show I saw where a kid was killed by a stray bullet. The round supposedly made it through a 1 inch or so gap between the top of the dirt, and the bottom of the wood boards. It then traveled through 2 or 3 walls, hit a cardboard ceiling tile thus changing trajectory, and hit a young kid is his head. The range was supposedly poorly maintained, which was evident by the bullet holes in the building. The thing that made me wonder, was how in the heck would someone approve of a building to be put directly behind the dirt pile for the range.

I also seem to remember a different story about a ticked off resident bringing a "bullet" into the local PD, claiming it was fired into his home from a nearby range. The "bullet" was a complete, unfired cartridge. If only all investigations were that easy
Haha stupid person...
 
GregGry,

That happened in Dallas. I think it was the Winchester gun range, but I'm not certain.

One of the investigative-type TV shows did a show on it. IIRC, the shooter was also found negligent due to poor weapon control... he fired twice, quickly (double tap, either intentional or not). The second shot was the one that killed the kid in the BB gun shed.
 
We had a similar thing happen at our local range: business owner complained about slugs hitting his warehouse. Unfortunately, the sportsmen's club that ran the range shut it down for good this past summer because of the hassle involved in contesting the claims. :(
 
Fly320s said:
GregGry,

That happened in Dallas. I think it was the Winchester gun range, but I'm not certain.

One of the investigative-type TV shows did a show on it. IIRC, the shooter was also found negligent due to poor weapon control... he fired twice, quickly (double tap, either intentional or not). The second shot was the one that killed the kid in the BB gun shed.

On the show I saw, they said the firearm had doubled. They didn't say the shooter was in trouble, the poor range upkeep was the problem. From the photos and videos I saw, the dirt berm wasn't anywhere near high enough, the wood boards above and infront of the berm had holes in them, and gaps. Although the shooter could have been charged, had the range been propely setup and upkept, it would have been impossible for the incident to happen. In a court I can't see a conviction from what happened, atleast for the shooter. The ownders of the range knew about the problem even if they deny it, there were other holes in the back of the building, some of which were covered according to the show. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the show, however from the videos I saw, it was obvious the range was in poor shape.
 
Greg & Fly:
I was a participant at the Dallas match where the boy died. I was also named as a defendant in the resulting lawsuit, as were MANY others. It was at Dallas Pistol Club. There were many factors involved in why the round ended up where it did. No one was charged as the lead slug was too deformed to ballistically tie it to any of the firearms present at the range at the time of the incident.
The police report(after exhaustive investigating) was that it was an accidental shooting. The lawsuit was a civil matter.
It was a bizarre, improbable occurance that resulted in the loss of a young boys life.
I still shoot pistol competition and hunt, but the bottom line is that if you are in front of the muzzle of a firearm,regardless of range design, you are subject to harm.
Also, Fly, the best way to p*** off an airgun shooter is to refer to their range as a "BBgun shed".
 
Before anyone gets the wrong impression, the smiley icon was supposed to go after my comment to Fly, NOT in the header.I can't figure out how to move it, computer illiterate don'tcha know.:confused:
 
GregGry said:
That reminds me of a show I saw where a kid was killed by a stray bullet...

Yup! Court Television ran it on their Forensic Files series. I think it first aired three to four years ago.

They did a great job with the physical and computerized recreation of the accident.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top