Bush Installs Judge, Bypassing Senate

Status
Not open for further replies.

JeFF D

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
190
Location
Macomb County, Michigan
WASHINGTON - Bypassing angry Senate Democrats, President Bush (news - web sites) installed Alabama Attorney General William Pryor as a U.S. appeals court judge on Friday in his second "recess appointment" of a controversial nominee in five weeks.


Pryor's federal appointment has been vigorously opposed by Democratic senators who have objected to his past comments and writings on abortion and homosexuality.


Bush praised Pryor as a "leading American lawyer" and said he had been pushed past the Senate's normal confirmation process because of "unprecedented obstructionist tactics" against Pryor and five other nominees.


The president said of the Democratic blockers: "Their tactics are inconsistent with the Senate's constitutional responsibility and are hurting our judicial system."


Pryor was immediately sworn in in Alabama by another 11th Circuit judge.


The Constitution gives the president authority to install nominees in office when Congress is not in session. Both houses were out this week for the Presidents Day holiday. But the appointments are good only until the end of the next session of Congress, in this case the end of 2005.


Last month, Bush used a similar appointment to promote Mississippi federal judge Charles Pickering to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites).


Bush said Pryor's "impressive record demonstrates his devotion to the rule of law and to treating all people equally under the law."


However, Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee (news - web sites), said none of Bush's nominees is more controversial than Pryor.


"Actions like this show the American people that this White House will stop at nothing to try to turn the independent federal judiciary into an arm of the Republican Party," Leahy said.


Democratic presidential contender John Edwards (news - web sites) said Pryor "has a long record of vigorous efforts to deny Americans' basic rights under our laws."


"This is one more example of why we need a new president," said Edwards, D-N.C., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.


But Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said the appointment was "a constitutional response to an unconstitutional filibuster."


"I've always heard that when you have nothing else to say, you call people names," Cornyn said. "That's apparently what Democrats are now resorting to, just name calling. Bill Pryor is a very qualified, highly professional nominee who has a proven track record of enforcing the law, rather than his own personal agenda."


Bush picked Pryor last April for a seat on the 11th Circuit that covers Alabama, Georgia and Florida. Abortion rights advocates immediately mounted a campaign against the nominee, citing his criticism of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade (news - web sites) decision that said women had a constitutional right to terminate pregnancy.


Pryor also came under fire for filing a Supreme Court brief in a Texas sodomy case comparing homosexual acts to "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography and even incest and pedophilia."


Republicans have been unsuccessful in five attempts, the last one in November, at breaking through the parliamentary blockade that Democrats erected against Pryor's nomination.





Pryor, 41, is a founder of the Republican Attorneys General Association, which raises money for GOP attorneys general.

Besides Pickering and Pryor, Democrats also have used filibusters to block Bush's appeals court nominations of Judge Priscilla Owen, Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada and judges Carolyn Kuhl and Janice Rogers Brown. Estrada withdrew his nomination in September.

While Pryor didn't speak to reporters Friday, Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions, a close friend and Pryor's predecessor as Alabama's attorney general, said he had talked to him on the phone and found him to be "very comfortable with the situation."

Many Alabama Republicans remain angry at Pryor for leading the charge to oust the state's chief justice, Roy Moore, for refusing to abide by federal court orders requiring him to move a Ten Commandments monument from his courthouse.

Supporters hope almost two years on the federal appeals court will prove to Democrats that Pryor, as they say he showed in the Ten Commandments case, is willing to look at more than one side of an issue.



By JEFFREY MCMURRAY, Associated Press Writer

Sorry if somebody beat me to it but yahoo said it was just released 3 minutes ago so I had to post it.
How does this guy stand on gun issues
 
The Constitution gives the president authority to install nominees in office when Congress is not in session. Both houses were out this week for the Presidents Day holiday. But the appointments are good only until the end of the next session of Congress, in this case the end of 2005.

Besides Pickering and Pryor, Democrats also have used filibusters to block Bush's appeals court nominations of Judge Priscilla Owen, Hispanic lawyer Miguel Estrada and judges Carolyn Kuhl and Janice Rogers Brown.

Am I missing something here? Why hasn't the President intalled the other nominees in office while Congress is not in session? Or has he already?
 
"Their tactics are inconsistent with the Senate's constitutional responsibility and are hurting our judicial system."
Someone needs to remind these morons that Bill Clinton is the one that moved this tactic to art form status. He used it to fill all kinds of posts in the government, not just the judiciary.
 
All I can say is, about time:cuss:
If the Democrats had any kind of logical excuse for their obstruction it would surely be a different story.

However, there does come a time when you have to stand up to the nonsense and use what you have at your disposal. GW did IMO, show a lot of patience in this stoopid circus, but it is time to get the congress to move on and quit wasting the taxpayers time.

For all this country needs, it seems imbeccilic to be fillibustering and backing up legislation which needs to be considered.
 
--Dubya finally grew a pair

--He's late to the party

--Looks like he reluctantly used executive privilege

--Judges he recess appoints generally do not end up permanently on the bench. The tend to lose their currency.

--If it was a true emergency it should have been done a while back

I think parachuting Robert Bork in on a recess appointment would have been entertaining, to say the least.

I'll take what I can get even though it is late.

Guess he looked at his base's poll results and decided it was time to throw 'em a bone.
 
President Bush also used a recent appointment to elevate Charles Pickering to an appeals court a while ago.
I think he should tell Tom (Weasel) Daschle and the rest of the Dem obstructionists that Ann Coulter is next up, if they don't stop throwing tantrums.
 
So the president uses a Constitutional method of appointing judges (as did Clinton) and that's a bad thing in the eyes of the Democrats.

But the Democrats use a non-Constitutional Senate rule to block appointments and that's a good thing in their eyes?

Ok, I understand now.





:rolleyes:
 
Jeff D

General Pryor is A++ on gun issues. He led the charge to get Alabama the reciprocity (CCW) we enjoy with other states, although it is limited by Alabama's minimal requirements. We will all be proud of Judge Pryor.
 
This is Alice in The Looking Glass all over again.

Wisconsin has a supreme court that's divided 4 conservatives to 3 liberals. One of those conservatives--Dianne Sykes--has been tapped for a federal judicial appointment. Unlike other Bush appointees, Sykes has the blessing of Wisconsin's senators Feingold and Kohl, which pretty much guarantees her a hearing and confirmation without the threat of filibuster from the Kennedy types.

Why?

If/when Sykes leaves the state's high court, Governor Jim Doyle will appoint his own new justice, one who will not face re-election until 2008. Thus, the WI state supreme court will have a liberal 4:3 ratio for four years.

Do you think for just one minute that Feingold and Kohl, who have blocked every Bush nominee, haven't had a sit-down with Governor Doyle on this issue?

It just gets dirtier and dirtier.
 
Am I missing something here? Why hasn't the President intalled the other nominees in office while Congress is not in session? Or has he already?
If I understand all this mess ... when he apoints them like this when Congress is not in session "...the appointments are good only until the end of the next session of Congress, in this case the end of 2005. "

If he does it through Congress the apointments are for life.


"Actions like this show the American people that this White House will stop at nothing to try to turn the independent federal judiciary into an arm of the Republican Party," Leahy said.
Translation: Leahy and other dems will stop at nothing to try to turn the independent federal judiciary into an arm of the Democrat party and get ticked off when a Republican gets in the way of that.

Democratic presidential contender John Edwards (news - web sites) said Pryor "has a long record of vigorous efforts to deny Americans' basic rights under our laws."
Unlike you and the rest of your Democrat buddies who would love to deny us basic rights under our laws too ... oh and further Translation: LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME! TURN THOSE CAMERAS IN MY DIRECTION! I'M RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT! LOOK AT ME!
 
"Actions like this show the American people that this White House will stop at nothing to try to turn the independent federal judiciary into an arm of the Republican Party," Leahy said.

Leahy went on to explain that Democrats had already called "dibs" on the idea of a political judiciary. "It's just not right! It was our idea and they are just a bunch of copy cats!"

Sources were unable to confirm the Republican response of "We're rubber, you're glue, whatever you say bounces off us and sticks to you."
 
The reason Bush didn't appoint the rest of his blocked judges is that they were asked and declined. They prefer to stick to the system, presumabley hoping for an increased Republican majority after this election.
 
You know, none of this would matter if judges actually ruled based on the Constitution instead of whether they are a Democrat or Republican....
 
Another point that reflect well on Pryor: He filed an amicus brief on behalf of Emerson in that 2A case. He's a strict constructionist, and all around swell guy. If the judgin' bidness don't suit him, he could run for office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top