somerandomguy
member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
- Messages
- 314
Hehehe USS Enterprise facepalm. I lol'd.
Hehehe USS Enterprise facepalm. I lol'd.
You like to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution we should ignore and which to support?
They're politicians, do you really want to become a politician? Everyone hates lawyers and politicians, do you really want to be one of the most hated people in the United States??? (As in less popular than cockroaches or headlice?) LOLWhy not? Lawyers, States, and LE have been doing it for years.
Hate on lawyers all you want, cry when I can afford to buy a transferable mg. MwahahahaahahThey're politicians, do you really want to become a politician? Everyone hates lawyers and politicians, do you really want to be one of the most hated people in the United States??? (As in less popular than cockroaches or headlice?) LOL
Lmao, never said you guys weren't rich.Hate on lawyers all you want, cry when I can afford to buy a transferable mg. Mwahahahaahah
Lol I wish!Lmao, never said you guys weren't rich.
Everyone hates lawyers and politicians, do you really want to be one of the most hated people in the United States???
Thank you!
Unbelievable that all the lawyer types (so smart) never even mentioned that possibility.
You not liking the constitution has caused me emotional distress and pain and suffering. LAWSUIT INITIATED.Pick and choose parts of the Constitution? I'm 3/5ths for that. The other 2/5ths of me won't compromise, and the 2A falls in that category. So sue me.
Amen; what does IP have to do with our beloved RKBA threads? Understood on the obvious risk here, but we're buzz-killing the beauty of it.
that the owner of the billboard might already have permission.Mentioned what?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
Yeah I doubt that WB was going to license him the right to use that image. At best he could claim is a fair use defense, but no way that was licensed.that the owner of the billboard might already have permission.
Actually, I'm going out of my way to become one of them. After the Bachelor's is finished, I'll be applying to law school.
So you're going to make an argument based on the assumption that the business owner did not first gain permission?Yeah I doubt that WB was going to license him the right to use that image. At best he could claim is a fair use defense, but no way that was licensed.
I'm going to make an educated guess as a copyright lawyer who does extensive work in licensing.So you're going to make an argument based on the assumption that the business owner did not first gain permission?
Is that standard practice to operate under assumption?
I stopped listening after the word "guess"... To make an "educated" guess, you would need to be educated on this particular instance, and since all we really know is that some guy stuck dirty harry on a billboard, then my guess is just as good as yours at this point.I'm going to make an educated guess as a copyright lawyer who does extensive work in licensing.
And how did you come with this conclusion? Do you have all the facts of the case?Stealing someone's intellectual property rights to promote your own rights? It does seem contradictory.