• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

buttstock tube magazines.. where did they go?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kaylee

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,749
Location
The Last Homely House
Looking through a picture book of ol' 19th century rifles, I saw our old friend the Spencer. (guldurn Yankees... :) )

Anyhow.. so why didn't that line of development go much forther? I mean, the tube magazine and lever action are both with us today in the descendents of the Henry.. was there a technical reason why the Spencer design lost out? Or was it something else? :confused:

-K
 
it's easier to build a truly RELIABLE rifle on the volcanic/henry/winchester planform (under barrel magazine feeding from front of receiver) for less money.

want an illistration of this look at the feed mechaism for a Spencer, then look at the feed system on a henry, or better yet the one on a Marlin 97 (which became the M39 "golden" in time)..

which one is simpler and easier to make? and which is les likely to breakdown or malfunction??


though some instock tube mags survive to this day, such as the Browning .22 auto that we are all probably fairly familiar with. the in the stock feed mechanisms tend to boder on "going round your rear to get to your elbow" from an engineering standpoint
 
Kaylee,

I think that you have to look at modern spire pointed centerfire cartridges to gain insight into why the tube magazine is very limited in use in the first place. Pointy nosed center fire cartridges are not happy when they are lined up one in front of the other.

Then, like Detritus says, look to the fact that it is easier to load from the front/bottom/side than from the back.

Meekly,

Meek :D
 
Funny I grew up shooting mom's Browning thinking loading it from the stock was pretty easy... twist knob, pull magazine tube partially out tuck under arm and gravity feed 10 shells through the stock, push and twist the mage tube back in place.. much faster than re-loading 18 shots in the Marlin 39, which I also grew up shooting.
 
Ask a Belgian... they got it right the first time. Mom's rifle has almost never jammed.

As for big bore stock-loaders... I'd likely agree there is a point of diminishing returns.
 
My little Remington 24 runs just fine with a buttstock mag. I've been shooting that one for over 40 years, no complaints yet.
Bob
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top