CraigC
Sixgun Nut
The .357 is a whole lot of noise without quite enough bite for my tastes. If you're looking at energy figures, you're betting on a meaningless number. Analyze the formula, it puts way too much importance on velocity, very little on bullet weight and zero on diameter. It is absolutely dependent upon expansion to be effective. The lowly .45Colt, pushing a 250-260gr cast bullet at 900fps produces a paltry 450ft-lbs but will penetrate any deer that walks end to end. A lightweight 110gr .357 may produce much more energy but which one do you really think is "more powerful"? Which is likely to produce a shallow wound and which one is likely to break a shoulder and completely traverse your average critter? So perhaps energy is not a good indication of effectiveness???
4¾" .44Spl - 39oz
4¾" .45Colt - 36oz
On what planet???...but 45 Colt doesn't seem to be popular enough.
4¾" .38Spl - 42ozI don't know about other planets with a different gravity, but on this planet, an SAA in a small caliber weighs a whole lot more than one in .45 Colt.
4¾" .44Spl - 39oz
4¾" .45Colt - 36oz
The .44WCF is a great cartridge but not without its own set of difficulties. Lack of carbide dies and thin case necks for one. Limited bullet selection and mismatched dimensions for another.IMHO, the best rifle/SAA combo is not .45 Colt, but .44-40, like the old days.
A great many cowboy action shooters would probably disagree. It was not a good rifle round originally because cases were made from folded copper or brass and had no extractor groove. Modern solid head cases solve this problem. I've never heard of folks having any issues with them and I've never had an issue with mine. That said, my preferences are different. As one might ascertain, I'm not the biggest .45Colt fan that ever lived, even though I own five of them.The .45 Colt is not a good rifle round today for the same reason it was not a good rifle round in 1873 - the rim is too small for really reliable extraction and ejection.