CALNRA: NRA Opposes Mandatory Pet Spay/Nueter (AB 1634)

[beaucoup ammo]

Point taken. It would be better if the proposed law were tweaked to reflect "those who allow pets not spayed/neutered to roam free will be ticketed."

A responsible breeder would never let his bread and butter be deluted or otherwise compromised. Of course his animals are well under control.

 

[Zundfolge]

It would be better if the proposed law were tweaked to reflect "those who allow pets not spayed/neutered to roam free will be ticketed."

Which is already illegal ... plus the law currently prohibits people from allowing their spayed/neutered animals to roam free as well.

 

[Mot45acp]

Does any one have a problem with this. If I wanted to save the puppies and kitties of the world, I would join PETA. I wanted to save the RKBA so I joined the NRA. Glad to see my $$$ go to good use.

 

[beaucoup ammo]

It is an imperfect world isn't it? Being responsible just doesn't compute with a lot of people. Adherence to the laws already on the books, the ones you mentioned, would solve my problem.

That done.. no, I would not want any further goverment fiddling whatsoever.

 

[ArfinGreebly]

Your Own Good

Hey, guys, chill already.

It's for your own good.

After all, who can object to common sense dog laws?

You all want to keep dogs out of the wrong hands, don't you?

Some people just should not be allowed to own a dog.

And there are some types of dog that nobody (except professionals) should be allowed to own -- nobody really needs that kind of dog!

Besides, it's not like the right to keep and walk dogs is constitutionally protected, right?

And if it's not specifically protected in the Bill of [strike]Needs[/strike] Rights, then it automatically becomes subject to government regulation.

Trust us: we know what's good for you (™).