PT92
Member
GoWolfpack I just bought a Taurus PT99 for $300 a few weeks ago...
Do you mean a used 99 (if not, where are they new for that).
-Cheers
GoWolfpack I just bought a Taurus PT99 for $300 a few weeks ago...
I'd look into layaway. These guys have a great layaway set up.
http://duckcreekarmory.com/
Used in excellent shape except for a scratch on the grips.Do you mean a used 99 (if not, where are they new for that).
-Cheers
Never had one but I would give the C9 a look. It has a solid reputation even around here, on a forum which is known for trashing guns because of the materials they are made of, even without any personal experience with said product.My wife and I had a session yesterday that included 100 rounds through the Hi Point C9. Winchester bulk FMJ and zero misfires. You can't beat the gun for "value" if budget is important.
Ruger over the Sigma even it cost a hundred more.
To me the Smith is more 'glock-like' whereas the Ruger is, well, a Ruger. So if you're more familiar with a Glock, go Sigma and vice-versa IMO.My Sigma was awesome. Very accurate, never jammed with various ammo... I sold it to my brother-in-law after I bought a XDM. I wish I would have kept it, I shot it this weekend and it's still the same great pistol it was when I had it. At least 5000 rounds thru it so far. Only complaint was the trigger and you get used to that. It took me about 200 rounds initailly but once I had the trigger pull down, I outshot plenty of XD/Glocks at the range. Of course I would outshoot those guys with their own pistols too, the point being that you are the limiting factor, not the pistol. The trigger is nothing you can't manage.
I think the Sigma is WAY better looking and more ergonomic than the older Ruger designs. The SR9 is another story, but it's also another price range.
Still a good buy.Used in excellent shape except for a scratch on the grips.