Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Can someone tell me the pros and cons...

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by crazydog, Oct 25, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. crazydog

    crazydog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    77
    ...of polymer frames vs. full metal frames, just want to understand why some people will choose polymer over metal.

    Thanks,
     
  2. SoCalShooter

    SoCalShooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,091
    Location:
    That's for me to know and not you!
    Polymer frame weapons are usually lighter, my kimber 1911 steel frame weights 39oz my hk usp .45 only 24oz.
     
  3. MisterPX

    MisterPX Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Amerika's Doyleland
    Well, beside being cheaper to manufacture...plastic weighs less, flexes = absorbs some recoil (not 100% sure about that one), and doesn't rust.

    In the grander scheme of things,most pistols with/without a plastic frame have no counterpart.
     
  4. SoCalShooter

    SoCalShooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    3,091
    Location:
    That's for me to know and not you!
    oh yeah the plastic is easier to make and cheaper than steel. I like both and it depends on the application, hunting I take my HK.
     
  5. Bazooka Joe71

    Bazooka Joe71 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,803
    Location:
    Southern Indiana
    Plastic obviously doesnt rust
    It weight quite a bit less, so its better for CCW
    It is cheaper to manufacture, which in turn makes it cheaper for you to buy
    It also feels better in your hand in the winter.

    On the other hand:

    Its not quite as durable
    Recoil is substantially greater(due to the lighter weight)
    And it just plain doesn't feel as good:D (My biased opinion)
     
  6. Hawk

    Hawk Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,512
    Location:
    Grand Prairie, TX
    I had read that the Poly and steel frame STI uses in the 2011 absorbs recoil.

    Now that I own one I still can't say that's accurate - it seems so, but it might just be the power of suggestion. My wild guess is that it absorbs about as much recoil as it adds by being lighter, hence a wash.

    It is marginally less likely to bring on a case of OCD for those of us prone to scratch and ding our weapons.
     
  7. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    Polymer is usually also thinner than a steel frame with Grips.


    But to me there are really three reasons why I choose polymer(glock) over a steel framed gun.

    1. Weight
    2. Weight.
    3. You guessed it..........Weight.

    If i'm going to carry it has to be as light as possible. My Glock 30 w/10+1 rounds of 230gr HP's is lighter than my old Colt Combat Commander with 7+1 rounds by quite a bit.

    Steve
     
  8. CWL

    CWL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,505
    Military preference of polymer resins over steel. Cheaper to manufacture, no need to machine like steel/alloy.

    Polymer also has higher resistance to corrosives(water) and extreme temperature/weather ranges than steel. Polymer firearms took-off in Austria (Steyr & Glock). -They remember what happened to steel guns on the Russian Front and in Arctic extremes.

    Having your steel gun shatter can ruin a war.
     
  9. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I have steel guns & I have both poly guns...it took me a very long time to accept polyguns...This year, I've only bought steel guns.
    I prefer the polymer over alloy guns in terms of lightweight & for durability. And between my USPs & my 1911's I'm equally & completely satisfied w/ their performance :D
     
  10. gaven

    gaven Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    106
    Location:
    gulfport
    MAGNET WILL NOT STICK TO POLYMER FRAME. SORRY ABOUT THAT I COULD NOT HELP IT , I KNOW YOUR QUESTION WAS SERIOUS.
     
  11. kokapelli

    kokapelli Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,575
    Location:
    Arizona
    Polymer has many advantages over steel, but I personally like the feel and weight of a steel pistol.
     
  12. Minator

    Minator Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    129
    Location:
    TEXAS
    Lol:what: Polymer absorbs recoil hahhahahahaha....anyway the main difference between polymer and metalic framed pistols is the weight as others have mentioned. In my own experience Ive owned an equal amount of polymers and metalic framed guns and have settled on heavier metalic framed pistols.

    Due to the fact of the felt recoil you recieve. Firing with one hand using a glock 17 (which is a full size 9mm with a 5" barrel) highlights an example of how some polymer framed pistols recoil. Which when shooting with one hand with a glock I have found that they tourqe to the right , which with your support hand in place it still does this action only in a smaller rotation which doesnt really matter you can train with it to get descent grouping.

    Which I personally chose heavier metalic framed pistols mostly 1911 and sig style pistols a few BHP's. Due to the fact that the recoil that I have experienced with one of these types with the heavier frame is a straight back push rather then a rotation which is harder to control and compensate for at least for me. The funny thing is I can shoot my sig .45 acp better than a glock 17-19 with equal trigger time.

    Dont listen to the fairytales you here on the internet about polymers being better because they wont rust and are more reliable. Any gun will rust because they all have metal parts unless its an airsoft as long as you keep any gun oiled and clean you wont have any rust or reliability issues(of course if it isnt a taurus or S&W).
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2006
  13. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    This sentence is very difficult to understand, but I don't think I have ever experienced whatever it is that you are trying to say.
     
  14. Minator

    Minator Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    129
    Location:
    TEXAS
    Every glock I have ever fired has had a hard tourqe to the right, which I thought it was me until I let quite a few people try it out and they experienced the same thing.
     
  15. Panthera Tigris

    Panthera Tigris Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Messages:
    314
    I've actually experienced less recoil with Glocks than any other handgun I've tried, and I've fired dozens and dozens of different handguns. Probably because Glocks fit me so well.
     
  16. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    If the gun, overall, works (i.e., is reliable, accurate, durable and has the shooting qualities I desire) for me, I am not overly concerned about what it is made of.

    That doesn't explain the price of H&K pistols. :p Although, they certainly are cheaper than the P7s.
     
  17. boldkharma

    boldkharma Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    185
    Location:
    OK
    Have to agree with Minator. My 17 will recoil like that one handed. My full size Springfield loaded(9mm) is a joy to shoot. Zero recoil.
     
  18. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,258
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    If it's that cold, you're no longer a combatant. You're a popsickle with a gun. And a simple fact: Cold temperatures adversely affect polymers long before steel. I own and shoot both and have full confidence in either, but steel feels better and is more durable. Why do you think polymer guns have steel inserts for the slide rails and other critical parts?
     
  19. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    "Polymer" (plastic) guns are cheaper to manufacture so the makers have a higher profit margin. They are lighter and easier to carry, so LE likes them. They wear well and are not affected by adverse environmental conditions, and since the majority of LE are not gun people, they like them because they believe they don't have to take care of it. On the downside, unless it's gas operated, they recoil more because of their light weight; this is a fact of physics, not a subjective opinion. They blow up on occasion, more so than steel frame guns, which is to be expected since plastic is not as strong as steel. Due to the "flex" in the frame, they tend not to be as accurate as steel frame guns, but any of them will shoot more accurately than 99.99% of the shooters, so this really isn't much of an issue. Except for the "flex" you can say almost the same things about aluminum framed guns. Aluminum is lighter than the steel but wear out quicker with excessive use.

    Personally, I prefer steel framed guns.
     
  20. Phil DeGraves

    Phil DeGraves Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,531
    "If i'm going to carry it has to be as light as possible. My Glock 30 w/10+1 rounds of 230gr HP's is lighter than my old Colt Combat Commander with 7+1 rounds by quite a bit."

    If I'm going to carry, I want to be able to hit with it. Heavier guns are easier to shoot accurately than lighter guns. The reason you carry a gun is to protect yourself when something really bad is about to happen. I shoot my steel frame guns better than any poly gun, so when my life and health are on the line, I want the gun I shoot best.
     
  21. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    i choose polymer for carry, except for my kahr which is steel framed but that is for the simple fact that it already such a small gun , and the steel frame helps the control aspect. polymer is light, dosen't rust, and they fit me that is the major reasons why i like polymer. but in no way am i limiting myself to only polymer guns. I would love to have a taurus pt1911.:)
     
  22. TestPilot

    TestPilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    976
    I have no preference one way or the other,since both have their strengths and weaknesses.

    Polymer is flexible. That not only contributes to recoil absorbtion,which I never felt significantly by the way,it also makes it more resistant to material being stressed and cracking.

    Metal is more resistant to gouging in point spots because it's harder.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page