Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Canada, SWAT team called for no trigger locks.

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by USAF_Vet, Jun 8, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. USAF_Vet

    USAF_Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,773
    Location:
    Hastings, Michigan
    My apologies to anyone who lives in Canada.

    http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2011/04/11/17953511.html


    [...Copyrighted Material Removed...]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 8, 2011
  2. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,439
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    That's interesting. I wonder how this one will turn out - Canada isn't nearly as lost as England, so I hold out some hope.
    Makes me very glad again I live in a Free State
     
  3. merlinfire

    merlinfire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    Yeah, let's just light that area up with machine guns, right?


    Edit: Maybe that's a little unfair.

    But law enforcement causing problems for folks once they have gone and made themselves look bad is not a uniquely Canadian problem. CYA is universal.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2011
  4. Sky

    Sky Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    2,927
    Location:
    Texas
    Like someone once said; " A government has a law against everything if they want to charge you with something".

    In the old days a LEO or two would have showed up to get the facts. Now seems many police departments are spring loaded to worse case scenario and go into a situation with guns blazing or flash boom throwing!

    Personally due to certain acts by LEOs lately I believe they are losing the high road and the trust of their population.

    Used to be you thought of police as a protector..a friend...many do not feel that way now due to widely reported abuses on youtube type channels. I hope things settle down and someone with a brain realizes that it is a lose lose situation for both sides.

    Just a thought and not a rant but am serious about keeping trust and respect of a population otherwise ?? not good . It becomes a self feeding cycle of violence for both sides.
     
  5. Dr_B

    Dr_B member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    822
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest, east of Washington but west of
    I rarely saw a police officer when I lived in Canada, and I rarely saw them when visited England. But if you do anything wrong they come out of the woodwork very quickly.

    Guns are another issue on which Canada deliberately tries to differentiate itself from America. They try very hard to be the opposite of America sometimes. Its part of their struggle to build a solid national identity. Sovereignty; that was the buzzword when I lived in Ontario.
     
  6. Unistat

    Unistat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    I don't know about Canada, but in the U.S. if a SWAT team shows up at your door, there has already been an investigation, a judge has reviewed it, decided that there was probable cause, and signed a warrant.

    There are times when SWAT shows up without a warrant, but those are usually active killer/hostage situations.
     
  7. Tom488

    Tom488 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2007
    Messages:
    532
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Yeah? Like the guy in the news today, that had a SWAT team kick his door in at 6AM, because they were looking for his (ex?) wife, who had outstanding student loans?
     
  8. Nushif

    Nushif Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,082
    Location:
    Corvallis, OR
    What I got from this is that the SWAT team got called because of a Squabble between grown men were involved.
    It ended up with a charge for cable locks. But let's not confuse the facts with second rate reporting techniques, shall we?
     
  9. Unistat

    Unistat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Yes, like that guy. Do you think there wasn't a warrant involved there? If so, why? Do you think DoE showed up because she didn't pay her student loans or was it an actual crime like fraud? Or do we now accept the media's account without scrutiny?

    Does it suck to be the person who's married to someone under a criminal investigation? Sure does, but that doesn't mean the warrant to search the home wasn't valid.
     
  10. dmancornell

    dmancornell Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    Orygun
    Even if the search warrant is valid, does that particular situation warrant a SWAT team deployment? Obviously not, but some tax parasite needs to justify the DOE pet SWAT team budget, hence the grossly inappropriate usage.
     
  11. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,524
    Use it or loose next years budget.
     
  12. 4thPointOfContact

    4thPointOfContact Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    839
    Based on the examples of ...

    Alberty Spruill, 16 May03
    Williemae Mack 03 Sep 02
    Robert and Marie Rogers 15 Oct 02
    Maichael Thompson 14 Oct 02
    Timothy Brockman 14 May 03
    Mary and Cornelius Jefferson (no date)
    Ellis Elliott 27 Feb 98
    The Crown Heights Raid 01 May 98
    Sandar Soto 05 Jun 97
    Saunsia Patterson 27 Feb 98 and about Twenty more pages of examples cited by The Cato Institute, I don't think 'having a warrant' is the problem.
     
  13. 4thPointOfContact

    4thPointOfContact Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    839
    "... Larry Glick, former executive director of the National Tactical Officers Association, an organization that represents the interests of SWAT teams and paramilitary police units, told the National Journal in 2000: “The original mission of SWAT teams has changed. If the SWAT team is not busy responding to initial barricades, people say they’re lazy. Departments want to give them something to do. Some agencies have given them too much to do. Some are overused.” The article went on to report that SWAT teams are now being used to respond even to calls about angry dogs..."
    ibid, page-17

    "...An overwhelming number of mistaken raids take place because police relied on information from confidential informants..."
    ibid, page-21.

    "...One can’t help but wonder why so many cases of bad warrants based on bad information from unreliable informants get by the judges and magistrates of the justice system entrusted with safeguarding the Fourth Amendment. In truth, the process has become little more than a rubber stamp exercise...
    ibid, page-23.

    '...A 2000 Denver Post investigation found that judges exercise almost no discretion at all when it comes to issuing no-knock warrants. The Post found that Denver judges had denied just five of 163 no-knock applications over a 12-month period (local defense attorneys were surprised to learn there were even five). “No-knock search warrants appear to be approved so routinely that some Denver judges have issued them even though police asked only for a regular warrant,” the Post wrote..."
    ibid, page-24.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2011
  14. Unistat

    Unistat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Unkown. SWAT teams are deployed for high risk warrants. This is usually when there are know to be, or strong suspicions of, weapons in the house. Another reason for SWAT deployment are if there are known violent persons. Could be either of those.

    Additionally, we only have the one person (and the media) saying it was a tactical team. What if it was five DoE investigators in body armor with shotguns? Does it make a difference who serves a high risk warrant?
     
  15. Overkilll0084

    Overkilll0084 Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    UT
    What possible education loan related issue could justify a SWAT response? Maybe it was a felony warrant, fraud maybe? Serving the warrant with a swat team was excessive. Oh yeah, she doesn't live there either. Whatever happened to serving a summons on someone? Or simply sending officer Bob to her place of work? That might be more appropriate in these situations.
    What's next?
    City Sanitation Tactical response team? Maybe one week you forget to sort out your recyclables.
    Wait till the library gets Tactical for overdue books.
    If you didn't know better, you'd think this stuff should be a SNL skit, not reality.
     
  16. HOOfan_1

    HOOfan_1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Virginia
    Sounds like a Keystone Cops situation.
     
  17. Br

    Br Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    Seattle area
  18. dmancornell

    dmancornell Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    Orygun
    Weapons in the house eh? Gun owners have no protection against police bruality and unreasonable searches?

    The real issue here is that the definition of "high risk" has been redefined to justify SWAT funding and the absurd concept of "officer safety".
     
  19. dirtykid

    dirtykid Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    538
    Location:
    Minne-soda
    Just the other day our "SWAT" or Swift-response team got called out because some guy got in arguement with GF, hit her ,threatened her to leave (which she did) so like 9-HOURS LATER they finally approach the house (after locking-down a 2-block radius) only to find him hiding in the garage,, Turns out the strucken-GF told police he had "guns"
    So here's our response-team all decked out in green-camo and black-vests surrounding a house, spooking all the neighbors,re-routing busy morning traffic,and the guy (except for his fists) was unarmed.. Nice waste of my tax-dollars !!
     
  20. Unistat

    Unistat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    502
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    It's not an unreasonable search if a judge has signed off on a warrant, by definition.

    But since I see I will not be able to convince you that 99.9% of SWAT actions are against genuine dirtbags or that the media has as much bias against cops as they do against gun owners or that the police are not just salivating for the opportunity to use their tac teams, I'll bow out of this thread and go back to reading books about how awsome the moon landing was.
     
  21. Apocalypse-Now

    Apocalypse-Now Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,148
    Location:
    deluxe apartment in the sky
    what were they fighting about....eh?
     
  22. dmancornell

    dmancornell Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    Orygun
    Oh right, I forgot people who work for the government are infallible, by definition. My bad. :rolleyes:
     
  23. LawScholar

    LawScholar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    408
    Location:
    Wyoming
    This bears repeating. An officer sneezing during an arrest leads to a civil rights suit these days.
     
  24. kd7nqb

    kd7nqb Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,207
    Location:
    Puyallup Washington
    WOW this is just dumb, its pretty clear that at some point they realized they raided this place and had to come up with something so the trigger locks was the only thing they could find. Now this guy is stuck with the hassle and bill for all of it.
     
  25. avs11054

    avs11054 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    649
    Location:
    AZ
    And what exactly is wrong with sending SWAT officers (who are also police officers) to arrest someone?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page