Cape man beats armed intruder to death

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Some can defend themslves with brute strength and some can't. Dd

Cape man beats armed intruder to death
By Laurel J. Sweet and Michele McPhee
http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg?articleid=80610

A remote Cape Cod farmhouse became the scene of a bloodbath early yesterday after two masked gunmen burst into a West Barnstable home and pistol-whipped its occupant, only to have the victim's son beat one intruder to death with a baseball bat, sources said.

Barnstable police responded to 56 Boxwood Drive after a panicked 911 call saying the suspects had forced their way into the home and began to beat Pete Somers with the butt of a handgun and attempted to tie him up, sources said.



Somers' son, Joel, who was upstairs, grabbed a baseball bat and rushed downstairs to help his father. By then, the elder Somers had fought off one attacker, who then fled.

The younger Somers apparently began to beat the second masked gunman, Osnel D. Azor, 23, with the baseball bat. Azor died a short time later at Cape Cod Hospital.

Law enforcement sources said it is unlikely that Joel Somers, who was recently released from jail, will face charges for the fatal beating.

Yesterday, Cape & Islands District Attorney Michael O'Keefe confirmed Azor was an intruder.

``He did not belong on the property - had no authority or right to be there,'' O'Keefe said.

Another law enforcement source said Azor, who lived in Dennisport, had a long rap sheet. Still, it remained unclear why the gunmen targeted the Somers family, police and prosecutors said.

``Police are conducting a series of interviews and they will continue to do so until they have a clear picture of what went on,'' O'Keefe said.

The Somers' neighbor, Arnold Eliason, called the rental ``a party house,'' saying: ``My gut feeling was there was monkey business going on.''

Both men told neighbors they worked in construction.

The Somers, formerly of Franklin, had moved to the dead-end street in September, according to their landlord, J.E. Vandell of Yarmouthport.

``They seemed like good tenants,'' Vandell said. ``They maintained the house nice and paid the rent on time.
 
Well there is simply nothing to charge him with.

His force was certainly comparable to that of shooting a man carrying a gun, which would have been lawful as long as the gun was legally posessed by the defendee.

Posessing sports equipment is legal even in countries like UK and Japan.
 
Yet another good reason to regulate baseball bats. Come on people, violent intruders in your home are just trying to make a living. They deserve a secure work enviroment, free from thuggish homeowners who are more than willing to inflict lethal trauma (via blunt instrument or military-style handguns) to "defend" themselves.

Besides, this Pete Somers probably did something to provoke the intruders into such a violent act. It's all his fault.








Really.
 
Law enforcement sources said it is unlikely that Joel Somers, who was recently released from jail, will face charges for the fatal beating.
So a released felon batters another felon to death? When thieves fall out? :confused:
 
I read the title for a couple days and didn't read the thread because I got a kick out of the first mental image the title gave me: Wannabe-Batman kicking hell out of a baddy. :D
 
If you make baseball bats illegal, only criminals would have baseball bats... or play on a professional baseball team... or something like that.

-Colin
 
Yet another good reason to regulate baseball bats. Come on people, violent intruders in your home are just trying to make a living. They deserve a secure work enviroment, free from thuggish homeowners who are more than willing to inflict lethal trauma (via blunt instrument or military-style handguns) to "defend" themselves
I know the above was posted with sarcasm and considering the subject of this thread it is actually pretty funny. :D

[thread highjack]
What isn't funny is that there are those on this forum that use exactly the same argument in all seriousness when defending and attempting to justify letting illegal immigrants freely cross our borders. :banghead: :cuss:
[/thread highjack]
 
You jest only because you don't know better

In Britain sporting equipment (including tennis or other raquets) are weapons, and carrying them without proving you are going to use them for the sport in question is a legal problem for you. I can't recite the specifics, whether it's a crime, or if you can just be detained and the sporting equipment confiscated, but it's not 100% legal to walk down the street with it.

Same deal for northern European countries (sorry I'm lazy, I think it was Netherlands) you can't carry a hockey stick, for the same reasons listed above.

IF baseball bats are used in a bunch of crimes in America they WILL be regulated. I'm not 100% convinced of that, if you show me some historical precedent that would counter that I'll believe you, but I can't think of any evidence to the contrary.
 
I can just see it now

If you lived in England, and were arrested for having bowling equipment on you, wouldn't your friends be proud of you for being arresed under the charge of "unautorized posession of 10 pound balls?" I would be! :evil:
 
"...sporting equipment (including tennis or other raquets) are weapons, and carrying them without proving you are going to use them for the sport in question is a legal problem for you."

So, if I'm somehow teleported to England, I've better have a more than decent explanation for the raquetball gear or rapiers and armor in the back of my car? Nevermind the more obvious toys..er, tools... Are you allowed to have a decent tire iron without a motion of Parliment?


Geez, the crap you guys put up with. I'm sorry. I rember reading about how upset the landed classes and Peers were about the various peasant uprisings, but I didn't know they and their enforcers were this paranoid today. Nevermind King Arthur, you all need that Robin of Sherwood guy back.
 
I think by "carrying around," he meant to say carrying around on the person and not transporting in the vehicle. At least that's how I interpret it.

But even here in America, if you're walking around the street with a baseball bat and nothing else in plain clothes, I think you'd get a few :confused: looks. Don't know if people would go as far to call the police but you never know. Especially after someone called the police on a 2.5 foot burrito. :evil:
 
Preacherman wrote:

So a released felon batters another felon to death?

Who said the bat wielder was a felon? It just says he was released from jail, a fact which might be interesting but bears no relevence to whether he was justified in beating an armed intruder to death with a baseball bat (i.e. violating the burglar's right to make a living any way he chooses :rolleyes: )

nico wrote:

so, in England, I would be hassled/punnished for leaving my tennis racquet/balls in my car?

You would have niether if you lived in England, your racquet and, ahem, balls having been confiscated by the Crown. :eek:

I hear in Australia, cricket bats are locked up between matches. Actually, I made that up, but is it that hard to believe?

316
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top