Reloadron
Contributing Member
A friend of mine is a devout collector of firearms. He owns 100s of guns. Recently his best friend, a dog named Sparky, needed surgery at a cost of $3,000. He went into his gun room, picked out a few items and sold them for enough money to pay for the surgery. Sparky is now happy and healthy. My friend believes that his collection is better than money in the bank. Do others use your collections in this manner?
Back around post #33 I left a few simple comments. However, looking at this original post I am going to call some degree of BS plain and simple. Any devout collector of guns owning hundreds of guns (to use your own words) would simply have the resources to sit down and write a check to the veterinarian service performing the surgery on "Sparky". Three thousand dollars isn't a heck of a lot of money, unless of course you do not have $3,000 or $3.000 in available credit and I find that very hard to believe of any devout collector who owns hundreds of guns, especially collectable guns. Heck, most collectors I know have $3,000 in cash laying in their gun safe just in case a real good deal comes along through a private sale. Just makes no sense to me and that is why I call BS on all or part of this story.
About all this thread has become is an open debate on whether guns serve as a good investment purely for investment purposes. Again, anyone I know, owning hundreds of collectable guns, certainly should have $3,000 in cash laying around to cover a vet bill.
Just My Take
Ron