Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
I have about 200 pounds of wheelweights, and would like to cast bullets for my 1847 Walker. Pure wheelweight is too hard I have been told, so if I add pure lead to the melt, what should the ratio be, lead/wheelweight?
Be sure to seperate the zinc and steel ones from the lead. If you get the heat high enough to melt the zinc weights it will contaminate the whole batch and riun it for casting.
only problem i think with pure wheel weights i thought was the
loading of cap and ball revolvers may put a little to much pressure on the loading leaver to shave of a ring of lead?
also you will need a hotter lead and good warm moulds to get good castings because the wheel weights will solidify quicker than pure lead which can lead to some poor moulds
"72coupe, how do you tell the difference in the zinc from the lead wheel weights?"
The Zinc weights will be marked Zn somewhere. They may LOOK like lead weights, or they may be flat rectangular weights with sticky tape on the back. Zinc weights will melt, but you'll have to get the temp up another 400 degrees. Normally any you miss will float to the top.
damoc has the right of it. Wheel weights are too hard for round ball casting if the balls are to be used in revolvers. They put unnessary strain on loading levers or loading machines. They also do not swage properly and you can get chain fires from unsealed chambers due to the hard alloy. I'd use the dead soft lead for the revolvers and the wheel weights for rifle projectiles.
Pure wheel weight lead always worked fine for 220 conicals in my ROA. The ROA has a load lever than can handle ANY strain, though, and a conical has a lot more bullet area against the cylinder wall. A lubed conical is safe from chain fires and needs no "swaging".
The ROA was designed to use regular hardness cast lead bullets as well as soft lead balls.
The iron wheel weights float to the top. The zinc wheelweights are harder than lead, they don't pass the fingernail scratch test. They're really nasty when they're mixed with lead, the zinc coats your lead pot and is really hard to get off.
There are two types of lead wheel weights. The ribbon weights are almost pure lead, the clip-on weights are about 95% pure. The clip-on weights are good for cartridge loads like .45 Cowboy loads with black or smokeless.
You can use any alloy of lead with a patch in a smootbore, but the bullet won't expand as well on game.
The traditional alloy for clip on wheel weights is 86% lead, 10% tin and 4% antimony.
I have used wheel weight alloy for ALL my muzzle loading bullets except minies for the past 34 years or so.
I load my revolver cylinders with a loading press since I loosened an arbor on a 1860 Colt type a few years ago. I have never hurt a loading lever (only my hand ). I chamfer the chamber mouths to ease the entry of the harder round balls, and have never had a chain fire that I could attribute to the front end. Accuracy is no different than using pure lead, but the bullet is a few grains lighter.
As for muzzle loading rifle, the ball never contacts the rifling. That is the job of the patch. So a rifle is no harder to load with a harder round ball than with a pure lead ball. If I were going to use a REAL type bullet, then yes, I would use pure lead just as I do in my minies.
It is an old wives tale (internet myth) that a harder lead ball can not be used in muzzle loading firearms, and I am getting tired of hearing it repeated every couple of days by folks who really haven't even tried it!
I've been casting .610 round balls for my Pedersoli Howdah Pistol (20 ga) from wheelweights.
They work fine in it and penetrate very well.
Haven't tried anything but pure lead in my C&B revolvers. Haven't needed to yet.
I like pure lead in my revolvers because it expands better on impact.
I could always mix my pure lead and ww on a basis of 1/1 or 2/1 to make my pure lead go a lot farther, I suppose.
My numbers were a tad off , my minie balls and roundballs cast from ribbon weights are soft and expand really well with good weight retention. I hit a 4" diameter branch of pecan in my burn pile backstop and a .54" minie ball cut it in half. I found the mushroomed bullet laying behind it. I weighed it and it had retained 90% of it's weight.
The bullets I cast from wheel weights to use in .45 Colt and .45 ACP are accurate, but so far I've just been shooting them at paper and steel plates where expansion doesn't matter.
One of my friends is getting a lead hardness tester, I'll do some tests then.
If you want soft lead, find yourself a roofer or two. Preferably one that does commercial work. Soft lead was used for roof flashings, and most roofers throw it away when replacing the roof.
Thanks for all of the replies. Sounds like I need to mix a little lead with the wheelweights, or buy a loading press. 250 pounds of wheelweights is a lot to go unused.
While pure lead is preferred over wheel weight alloy for round balls used in Cap & Ball revolvers you can probably get away with using WW alloy if that is all you have. Keep in mind that WW alloy age hardens considerably over a two week period after casting. I have used WW alloy round balls to win several C&B revolver shooting matches, so don't believe everything you read online. WW alloy will cast a bit crisper and slightly larger than pure lead (a plus actually) They will also be a tiny bit lighter. When first cast they will be about Brinell hardness 6 or only slightly harder than pure lead which is a 5. After one week the balls will be about BHN 9 and after 2 weeks about BHN 12 (actually 4 times harder than when first cast) So--the trick is to shoot them within a couple of days of casting. If this is impossible, bake them in the oven at 425-450 degrees for an hour the night before and let them cool slowly by simply turning off the heat. This will anneal them back to their original as cast softness. If your gun is set up with proper chamber diameters to match your revolver's groove diameter you may find better accuracy using the slightly harder metal. The better "castability" of WW alloy over lead makes for more perfect balls and fewer voids or inclusions.
Good information, Curator! I used to cast wheelweights for a Marlin 1895 45-70 waaay back in the 70's when they first came out. At that time,the barrels had "micro-groove" rifling, and I never did get good accuracy with pure wheelweight castings for some strange reason. Now that I'm interested in percussion revolvers, and have all these wheelweights, I thought I would use them. When I started this thread, I was thinking about when seating the ball, shaving off the ring of metal insures a good seal in the cylinder. With wheelweights being much harder, I wondered if you would get the same result when seating the ball. All of ya'lls replies have been most helpful.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.