Cav Arms MK-II Receivers out-of-spec

Status
Not open for further replies.

Badger Arms

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
3,738
Location
Harnett County, NC
I ordered a Cav Arms MK II receiver from Armalite right after they did an email advertisement. I intended to sell it as a complete lower for somebody intending to build a rifle. When I assembled it and tried to test-install it on my RRA upper, it didn't fit. The holes were about .050" off. I'll bet I could have used a hammer to pound the pin through, but the level of force I had to use worried me.

I called and emailed Armalite. They were very helpful and suggested I send the receiver back to them and they would 'make it good.' Before I did this, I called Cav Arms. Their suggestion was to "try to get it to work and if you ruin the receiver, send it back and we'll replace it." So... after a little deliberation I sent the finished lower back to Armalite and they offered me a refund, which I took. The reason they offered the refund was, and I quote from their email, "I had engineering look at it this morning and the holes are out of spec. I'm sorry. I already processed a refund at your request..." That from Jennifer. Moral of the story is as follows:

Armalite is a stand-up company. The Cavalry Arms receiver was out-of-spec. I have read a story by another Cav Arms Receiver owner who had the exact same problem with his lower. Cav Arms proceded to post a video on their web site mocking the individual showing somebody at their shop putting together and pulling apart uppers on the receiver that was returned to them after he had this problem.

Here's some pictures. The first one shows the way-too-large slot for the bolt stop. I took readings with calipers, it's about .060" off. This caused the bolt stop to lean forward on its pivot pin when I pushed the top of it like a bolt would have. Second picture shows my Bushmaster receiver next to it. I put drill-rod through the front pivot pins so they were aligned perfectly. I then did the same thing with the rear. Hmmmm. Something is not right here. Third picture shows the gun with the front pin installed and gives you an idea of how large the difference was:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • cav 1.jpg
    cav 1.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 378
The Cav Arms folks seem to be good people and are generally responsive to their customer base. Their lowers are quite popular over at AR15.com. I owned a Mark I lower for a brief moment in time. When I put an upper on it and pulled back the charging handle, the carrier got stuck in the buttstock. :rolleyes:

During their upgrade program to Mark II, I sold it off to someone who wanted to upgrade and never looked back...I don't think there are issues in general with their stuff, but the whole experience left me cold.
 
I'll say for the record that the FEATURES of the MK II receiver are fine. I like the expanded magazine well so you can fit Grease Gun magazines in. I also like the ergonomics of the pistol grip and the light weight. It seemed to fit well otherwise to the contour of the upper, just that I couldn't get the rear pin in. All it needed as a relocated rear hole and I would have been happy. Alas, I'm going to have to suffer. Wonder how good the Bushmaster composite lowers and uppers are? Noodle barrel, composite upper and lower... hmmmm?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top