Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CCW .38 revolver for 430$

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by .380awsome, Dec 25, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. .380awsome

    .380awsome Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    169
    Location:
    Virginia
    hey guys ive managed to come up with 430 bucks,and im thinking of getting a good CC revolver ,i've been looking at the S&W 637 and ruger sp101 2" mainly,but is there anymore that you guys know of

    thanks
     
  2. savit260

    savit260 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Messages:
    792
    That kind of money should get you a very nice used S&W model 19.

    I'd much prefer that to either listed.

    The 19 (2 1/2" or 3" or even 4" with the right holster) is small enough to CC easily, and big enough to shoot well.
     
  3. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,930
    Ruger advantage - no screws to come loose and mess up your gun. They're more reliable than S&W revolvers. However, S&W has a better trigger pull and should be trouble free provided you check the screws every now and then.
     
  4. Doc_Jude

    Doc_Jude Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    193
    Location:
    Victorville, CA
    The SP101 is nice, Smiths are great too. I think that your chances of getting a new SP101 are greater for the lower price (of course). I'd take a new SP101 over a used Smith, you're putting your own mileage on your own gun.
    Wolff springs & a little work can work out most of the S&W trigger comparisons.
     
  5. thesecond

    thesecond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Smith and Wesson j-frames include, but may not be limited to, the following models:

    (The most I could think of from instant recall)
    36/37/38/40/42/49/60/337/340/342/360/438/442/637/638/640/642/649

    And they had dash-1 to dash-infinity 'iterations' of the model numbers.

    Differences:

    airlite (scandium/titanium cylinder) 10-11 oz.
    airlite (scandium/steel cylinder) 13.3 oz.
    airweight (aluminum/steel cylinder) 15 oz.
    standard (steel frame/steel cylinder) 21-23 oz.

    Exposed hammer (chief's special), shrouded hammer (humpback), enclosed hammer (centennial)

    1 7/8" barrels or 2-2 1/8" barrels for snubs, some available in 3" barrel lengths.

    Some .38 special only, some .38 +P, some with .38/.357 capability (including +P)

    Maybe pre-lock/no-lock, maybe ILS (integral locking system).

    Maybe MIM parts, maybe not. Maybe pinned barrel, or not. Maybe recessed chambers, or not.

    Plenty of choices available. I sold a few myself, used/like new, all under the $430 ceiling, so you can find a quality used (or new) one, for certain, within your budget. You may find them, however, at a wide range of prices, depending on how pretty you need it to be. But then again, it's a CCW piece, so who needs to see it? It's beautiful if it's reliable, IMO.
     
  6. loneviking

    loneviking Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,055
    Location:
    Carson City, NV.
    S&W model 65 or 66---having bought the 65 I wish I had the adjustable sights on the 66. The Mod. 19 is also very nice and I have one with a 4" barrel, but it is a bigger gun than the 65/66's. Get one in .357 caliber so you can use both .38 spcl. and .357. Don't skimp on your holster. My holsters are from Rob Leahy at simplyrugged.com and I highly recommend these. You can use 'em both OWB and IWB.
     
  7. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    11,263
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    Any handgun must fit your hand to be able to shoot it well enough for CC. Go to your local gun shop and try a few revolvers on for size. Don't discount a used revolver either. It takes a great deal of abuse to damage a modern commercial firearm.
     
  8. arizonaguide

    arizonaguide Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    273
    Location:
    Alaska/Arizona
    I'm pretty happy with the S&W#442 38+P I just got for CCW.

    (it was $432, including tax, Brand NEW! PHX,AZ.)
    And the recomended load seems to be Speer 135 +P JHP's.
    I probably would have gotten the .357 version if I had just a little more $ at the time...so maybe price those where you live, also.
     
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2008
  9. hinton03

    hinton03 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    538
    I love my M49!
     
  10. WC145

    WC145 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,265
    Location:
    Maine
    Hmm, are you finally settling on something? I hope so. Here's my contribution to help you along, Bud's Gun Shop has new S&W 642's for $399 delivered. If you use a CC there's a 3% premium but even with shipping insurance ($5) it'll still be under your $430 limit. An even better deal from them right now is new Kahr CW9's and CW40's for just $369!
    www.budsgunshop.com
     
  11. wnycollector

    wnycollector Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,121
    Location:
    Western NY
    I carry/own both ruger and S&W snubs. I recently sold my S&W 638 but still have my 1964 pinned M36. Shooting a snub takes LOTS of practice...airweights like the 637 are not fun to practice with. I would lean twords the ruger...especially if you decided to get it in .357. The big downside with the ruger is that it really is a bit to large and heavy for pocket carry.
     
  12. orchidhunter

    orchidhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    .380awsome, For ease of carry one of the S&W Airweights is the way to go. orchidhunter
     
  13. ulflyer

    ulflyer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,358
    Location:
    NC
    Charter Arms?

    Used to make some solid inexpensive 38's. Are they still around?
     
  14. orchidhunter

    orchidhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    ulflyer, Charter arms are still around, but they are not what they use to be. orchidhunter
     
  15. Stainz

    Stainz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Location:
    Pinson, AL
    I would suggest the 442 (black) or 642 (grey). Both are enclosed hammrs, so nothing to catch on your pants/coat, either. They run $409 + s/t new around here. Great revolver for CCW, not so much for plinking. They are .38 Special +P rated - carry 148gr wadcutters (mild target ammo) to the +P 158gr LHPSWC ('FBI load') for protection. There are far better choices for plinking - but this is designed as a 'Doomsday Device', for when the fecal matter impacts the air movement device - and it excells at that. At 15 oz, some 10 oz less than the ~2" SP101, it won't be noticed in a pocket holster, like the excellent ones Robert Mika makes.

    I've owned lots of Rugers. I have fewer revolvers now - but they are all S&W. My Rugers weren't dependable - and all came with QC issues. No problems with the S&Ws - mostly IL equipped, too. YMMV.

    Stainz
     
  16. revolverforums

    revolverforums Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    105
    For CCW weight and size are two key factors. By a gun that is easy for you to conceal and easy for you to carry all day. Anything is fine on the hip but a 2 pound gun in your pocket is a different thing.
     
  17. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,568
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    thesecond, that was a very good writeup you posted for the OP. Just one small correction, the shrouded hammer revolver you called a humpback is really a "Bodyguard" frame. (my favorite revolver frame)
     
  18. jaydubya

    jaydubya Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    512
    Location:
    Sandy Eggo
    I have a Smith 637 Airweight, purchased six years ago. Had I known then what I now know, I would have bought the 642 instead. This is a HD/SD weapon with potential for pocket carry if ever we get a sympathetic sheriff (Ah, California!). Therefore all my practice with it is at five-ten yards, entirely double action. I have fired it single action maybe ten times in that six years. At home I have practiced carrying my 637 in an Uncle Mike's pocket holster, and quickly learned that I must put my thumb tip on the hammer when drawing to prevent a snag. The 642 has no external hammer to snag. The 638 does, but it is within a shroud that should prevent snags. Oh -- the sum you mentioned would just about buy you a new 642 here.

    Cordially, Jack
     
  19. jffyg

    jffyg Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    I have a Ruger SP101 and just today bought a Taurus 85S. I have not shot the Taurus yet but let me say without any doubt the Ruger is 110 percent better built gun night and day period every aspect. However you pay for that in the size and weight department, the Taurus is way easier to hide on your body and that's a strange thing to say because they are not all that different in size but are kind of different in shape. I sold a Bersa thunder 380 to get the 85 I hope I did not make a mistake.
    I like the smiths but when looking at used ones I noticed that the alloy bodies can get nasty gouges in them, I don't know...just try each one for yourself.
    Good luck!
     
  20. jaydubya

    jaydubya Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    512
    Location:
    Sandy Eggo
    Jffyg -- those "nasty gouges" on 6xx Airweights are in the plastic overspray, not the alloy frame. Smith&Wesson will replace it on fairly recent models, free of charge, and on their postage nickel. And comparing Rugers to Airweights, one can carry an Airweight in one's pocket (in a pocket holster, of course) all day and not even notice it. Try that with a Ruger.

    Cordially, Jack
     
  21. oneounceload

    oneounceload member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,710
    Location:
    Hot and Humid FL
    the 66 is just the stainless version of the 19.

    While good guns, IMO, they are a tad heavy and large for CCW comfortably....
     
  22. Guillermo

    Guillermo member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    6,346
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    At that price you have a lot of great options.

    I am not a fan of DOA guns (I admit owning one) but a nice older Smith, like a Model 10 would fit the bill. (I saw 2 at thebeardedtrader.com for $375).

    In my never-so-humble-opinion, an older quality gun is better than new schlock anyday!

    Have fun finding your new gun.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page