aryfrosty
Member
With the advent of a more gun friendly majority in state politics there have been two important changes for us here.
The law concerning "brandishing" a weapon did state that it was illegal to display a weapon if one felt threatened. Now a weapon may be displayed or "brandished" in order to let the bad guys see that you are armed.
"Antis" had forced a rule change which prohibited carry of a weapon in the state house, or on the grounds, by anyone other than a police officer. That has now been done away with. It is still a partially open issue for rules committee work but the feeling is that on open carry will be disallowed and CCW will be OK.
As anticipated the "antis" are screeching like barn owls about the former issue. I love the sight of a dismayed anti-gunner on the news. They still haven't gotten the message that citizens have no wish to see any further loss of rights.
The law concerning "brandishing" a weapon did state that it was illegal to display a weapon if one felt threatened. Now a weapon may be displayed or "brandished" in order to let the bad guys see that you are armed.
"Antis" had forced a rule change which prohibited carry of a weapon in the state house, or on the grounds, by anyone other than a police officer. That has now been done away with. It is still a partially open issue for rules committee work but the feeling is that on open carry will be disallowed and CCW will be OK.
As anticipated the "antis" are screeching like barn owls about the former issue. I love the sight of a dismayed anti-gunner on the news. They still haven't gotten the message that citizens have no wish to see any further loss of rights.
Last edited by a moderator: