Chicago CeaseFire staffer arrested on drug and weapons charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

DonP

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,294
Location
Chicago area
In the "Do as we say not as we do" column, this from the ISRA on the arrest of a Chicago based CeaseFire staffer.

Maybe he'll be one of Jesse and Pfleger's spokepeople this afternoon about getting "illegal guns" off the street and away from drug dealers in Chicago. CeasFire is one of his big supporters. I love Slutkin's response, ... well, nobody's perfect at screening employees.

Go to the Tribune at: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chicago/chi-ceasefire28_webaug28,1,5184549.story[/url]

Anti-gang worker had guns, drugs, cops say

By Angela Rozas

Tribune staff reporter

August 28, 2007

An outreach worker for CeaseFire, a Chicago-based group that tries to curb gang conflicts and stop shootings, was arrested over the weekend after an AK-47, a handgun, live marijuana plants and drug paraphernalia were allegedly found in his home, police said.

Louie Velasquez, 23, of the 3400 block of West 37th Place had been working with the program for about four months, said Gary Slutkin, founder of the program. After the organization learned of his arrest, Velasquez was fired, he said.

Velasquez was alone in the home when he was arrested about 10 p.m. Saturday and charged with cannabis production, owning a firearm and ammunition without a valid firearm owner's identification card, police said. Police said he had boxes of ammunition, sun lamps, a loaded .38-caliber revolver and gang paraphernalia, in addition to CeaseFire pamphlets and T-shirts.

CeaseFire's mission is to reduce violence and mediate gang disputes. The group, which has been credited with helping to reduce violence in the city in recent years, employs primarily former gang members who are familiar with the gangs and people in the neighborhoods where they work.

Slutkin said he doesn't know the particulars of Velasquez's case, but he said the possibility of a former gang member being active, or "lapsing" back into gang life is possible, though he believes rare, in his organization.

The program thoroughly screens people who want to work for the organization, he said, taking only a small percentage of applicants. He also said that the organization trains and monitors its members to ensure they are not involved in illicit activity. The organization has about 150 paid staff members, and it has had about 300 during the organization's history.

"Nobody can be 100 percent in their recruitment, selection, supervision and training. But nobody has worked at it more," Slutkin said.
 
Lies. An anti-gunner hypocrite?!?! Perhaps we can try to push this information into more mainstream media sites. Lets start writing letters to the editor chastising the antigun movement and talking about their hypocrisy.
 
Some of the most anti-gang activists are gang members themselves. They even try to kill gangbangers, they're so dedicated. Just not the ones in their own gangs.:p
 
Biker: That is not necessarily true of all gangs. I used to be associated with a gang about 10 years ago and I still have friends and family who do. I dont necessarily associate with them but if I see them I maintain a friendly demeanor.

Gangbangers are not necessarily the monsters some people make them out to be. Some are pretty bad guys but others are only involved in the gang as a means to survive a harsh situation.
 
Well lets define gang first before we make such general statements.

Oh let's not and just go with the agreed upon generalization that they are people who associate with each other because they are too spineless to stand alone. They commit crimes and pray on the weak as a means of survival. They drag young kids in because they don't do hard time until they are old enough to be charged as adults.

Are you really going to spew apologist gang rhetoric here or can we just leave it alone and call it even?
 
Are you really going to spew apologist gang rhetoric here or can we just leave it alone and call it even?

Obviously, you are not familiar with the poster in question.:)

The Ignore List is your friend, and the friend of this forum in general. He's had a place of honor on my list for a while. IMO some discussions just aren't worth having, like, oh, I don't know, "gangbangers aren't really bad guys" discussions.
 
Obviously, you are not familiar with the poster in question.

The Ignore List is your friend, and the friend of this forum.

Yes, that's true, but I like to think that everyone has something positive to contribute from time to time. His name stands out in my mind, I'd like to think he provided some useful info at one time or another.

I'm not angry or trying to slap him around, just making a point.

He has a right to his opinion, I'd just think he might try and find a more sympathetic venue for it.
 
Gangbangers are not necessarily the monsters some people make them out to be.

Back in the old days, when we spoke a language called "English," the term "gangbanger" meant either someone who belonged to a gang and participated in murdering people or a participant in a multiple rape.

Which of those two pastimes is not necessarily monstrous? Or is there some other meaning of the word "gangbanger"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top