Lone_Gunman said:
Is there any chance that your opinion of them might be possibly influenced by the fact that you can hire them for less, expect more work for them, and ergo increase your own profits?
Good, honest question, and I'll be happy to give you an honest answer. Let me warn you right now, though - my answer isn't going to line up with your preconcieved notions, so you may be more comfortable skipping it.
There are two types of employers in this discussion. There are those who hire people that they know are illegal, pay them like crap and treat them like crap. I'm not going to deny that those folks are out there, but they're in the minority among employers. Those are the companies you see on the news getting big fines and such when they get busted by the INS, and they deserve it.
Most companies are kind of like me. I pretty much know that many of my employees are illegal immigrants, but (even though
Biker calls for me to be lynched every time I say it)
the law requires that I accept any documents that appear legal. Due to privacy concerns, the law also doesn't allow me to check the validity of these documents without some kind of valid reason - like if I was putting an employee into a security-sensitive position or something. I'm not, so I can't, and that's pretty much the end of it. The only way I'll ever find out if an employee's social security number (for example) is invalid is if the INS decides to conduct an audit of my payroll records. If they do, then they send me a letter saying "Such-and-such number is invalid", so I have to terminate that employee, and that's it.
Now, you might ask yourself why the social security administration doesn't check to see if these numbers are valid whenever I send them the payments from my new employee, right? Seems like it'd be easy for them to see if a number wasn't valid, or if it was assigned to some 80-year old woman in Nebraska, right? Once you understand why they don't do that, you'll have come a long way towards understanding who's really at fault here.
The point being that I have to treat all of these guys exactly as if they were legal citizens or immigrants with work permits. On what basis exactly could I pay them less? Green help, with no construction experience pays $11-per-hour with us. That may not sound like much among you northerners, but it's the going rate here in the south. Doesn't matter if you're latino, white, black, or whatever - that's the rate.
In fact, when our white or black entry-level help leaves us, it's usually to take a job where they pay
less - so it isn't a pay issue at all. See, down at McDonald's or Wal-Mart, they're paying $10-per-hour, only there you don't have to work as hard, and you get to stay in the air conditioning all day. Nevermind that 5 years from now you'd be making $16-$18 an hour with us, and in that same 5 years you'll still be flipping burgers at McDonald's. All they are interested in is immediate comfort with less hard work. The Mexican guys on the other hand, still feel that construction is an honorable trade and a good career. They don't mind the work, and they don't mind the heat, and they go crazy for any training or advancement we offer them.
So is my company saving money by hiring huys who might be illegal? Maybe, but if we do it's because of increased productivity and reduced turnover - not because of paying lower wages. We'd be putting ourselves in a major legal bind if we tried crap like that. The second I bid on a Federal or State conract (which we do all the time) I'd have agents from the NC Wage & Rate Bureau practically kicking down the door of my office.
ProficientRifleman said:
'Card, you sound like good liberal.
Cosmo said:
'Card is spewing the accepted White House line.
*chuckle*
So which is it, guys? Am I a liberal or a Bush-buttboy now?
The bottom line is that I'm neither. I used to be a diehard conservative, but now that the Republican party is owned by the Christian right, I've taken to calling myself a libertarian. My politics though, are pretty much irrelevant to this discussion. What is relevant is that I'm a reasonably intelligent, patriotic, redneck, hillbilly, independent-thinking military veteran who has seen this immigration mess up-close-and-personal for years now, and I simply feel differently about it than most of you guys. I wonder why you all find it so threatening when I interrupt your immigrant-bashing circle-jerks to say "Hey, you know - I used to feel the way you guys do, but I changed my mind"? Well, that's not true. I don't wonder about it. I understand it perfectly, but I won't insult you by stating the obvious.
As for this whole "Immigrant Civil War" thing... I mean, come on. If you want to huddle in the corner of your basement with your tinfoil hat, stroke your assault rifle and fantasize about SHTF scenarios, then more power to ya - but let's leave immigration out of it, OK? The whole idea is so absurd that it's laughable. Fantasize about bird flu, hurricanes, earthquakes or JBT's and I'll play along.
By the way, counting that last post, I've been called a liar now no less than 5 times in this thread. Do you guys think I'm just completely making this stuff up, or are you simply incapable of having an adult discussion with someone knowledgeable who doesn't share your opinion?