Like I said in the Dean thread, this is the guy that really frightens me. I don't even think hes a true leftist Democrat, I just think he's pretending to be one to get elected (though he's a real long shot).
I am not a military man, but I'd like to hear what some current/former servicemen think of the notion that military service automatically means you would be good at foreign policy.
Cause really, thats all I see here. Seems that that portion of the "anybody but Bush" crowd that for whatever reason don't want Dean seem to push the line that since Bush is percieved (wrongly, they think) as good on foreign policy, the only way to get rid of him is to have someone stronger.
Course, giving Europe the "veto" over our action does not seem too strong to me.
And that's what scares me about this guy. He'll say ANYTHING if he thinks its what people want to hear. And then if it turns out he was wrong he'll say the exact opposite.
Dean and Clark, the two Democratic contenders I'd never vote for in a million years. (The others not in 500,000 years). Yet they are the only two that seem to have much "buzz" around them. Should be fun!