Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CMP Kimber Model 82 Gov't Target Rifles: Trash or Treasure?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Geno, May 12, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,969
    CMP Rifles: Trash or Treasure?

    I chose to post the thread here, because I hope to encourage that folks purchase these CMP Kimber rifles for use other than simply competition, as in any daily shooting, from plinking to informal competition.

    I was hesitant to post these targets for concern that someone would think me to be bragging. Ultimately, it dawned on me…in terms of genuine target-grade .22LRs, these targets are average at best. The pros shootists fire groups that consistently measure in the range of 0.01 to 0.03 at this distance, and farther, so there sure isn’t any bragging. :D To that end, I thought what I am really showing is that if an “average shootist” such as myself can fire groups like these, then these CMP rifles must truly be exceptional quality. So, if anyone is considering the CMP’s Kimber Model 82 Government .22LR Target Rifle, these pictures should support the notion that they are worth every cent of $600.00, new in the box.

    Does anyone else have a CMP Kimber, CMP H&R or CMP Savage Target .22LR? If you do, please post your average targets. As you can see, these were not fired with “target” ammunition. The answer to the opening question, CMP Rifles: Treasure!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    Three of the guys I shoot smallbore with have these rifles. They are a good deal at $600. A comparable rifle with sights from any other source would cost over $1,000.

    Too bad so many people are addicted to bench shooting and refuse to learn real shooting skills.

    These fine rifles are going to waste.
     
  3. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,969
    Excellent point. This rifle feels better in a "seated" position than "benched" position!

    Given how well it groups with the steel target sights, I will likely use it as-is...i.e., not scoped. If I do put a scope on it, I likely would opt for a Leupold 6X w/, AO, fine crosshair and target turrets. I do plan to take it to the range and drop the 36X on it just for a kick.

    And again, these groups were fired using Aguila Colibri, 20 grain, powerless ammo, at 20 yards. Darned nice rifle. Our daughter really likes it too.

    Thanks for the input.

    Doc2005
     
  4. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    [understatement] Looks like a good shooter[/understatement]
    :D

    Now park your butt,belly, or feet on the pavement and shoot it the way its meant to be shot, you'll be suprised at how fast your goups will tighten up with a little practice:cool:
     
  5. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    We used to be a nation of riflemen but today we are a nation of sandbaggers who think they have to have a scope, bench and sandbags before they can zero a rifle or shoot one.

    It is sad that our rifleman heritage is being forgotten.
     
  6. jcwit

    jcwit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,011
    Location:
    Great state of Indiana
    OooooYeeeeaaaaa there goooood shooters. Went to the north store 3 years ago to get a Kimber, wife talked me into also getting one of the H&R M12. Man am I glad, not sure which one is the best shooter. Do you have your rifle scoped? Try shooting at 50 yds. (which is what I usually shoot) and post pics. I use S/K rifle match, usually one hole groups flyers are my fault mostly. Anyway thats some fantastic shooting.
     
  7. jcwit

    jcwit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,011
    Location:
    Great state of Indiana
    Say that post sounded like I only got the H&R, Nope came home with both, wife just talked me into the H&R also.
     
  8. hksw

    hksw Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,157
    Location:
    OH
    Was so impressed with the first Kimber 82G I got from the North Store that I bought 2 more. Also picked up an H&R M12 but it hasn't yet shot as well as the Kimbers. (Could be an optics issue.) It will be one of my project guns. Best ammo that runs through the 82Gs has been (for me) RWS R50.
     
  9. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,969
    Cracked Butt:

    I agree. I fired all of those groups in a seated position...no bench, no sling. Just me seated squarely on my butt, on the basement floor, proped elbows on the bent knees. It was so comfortable that it shocks me!

    I cannot go prone until I get my spinal implant removed this month, or next month. Then, I will have full range of motion again! I can't wait to get prone again!!! I really miss it!
     
  10. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    22,312
    Friend of mine got one of the Kimbers. It does very well, he won the 200 yard stage of a smallbore match with it last month. He also has a H&R and one of the surplus 40Xs; neither is as accurate, although the H&R comes closer than the well worn Remington.
     
  11. Beetle Bailey

    Beetle Bailey Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,240
    Location:
    California
    I noticed the ad states the rifle is 10.75 lbs. How suitable is it for shooting from the standing position?

    BTW, nice groups!
     
  12. Gaiudo

    Gaiudo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,612
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    wonderful groups, doc!
     
  13. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,969
    Thanks, all!


    Bettle:

    I find the rifle to be extremely comfortable in either standing or seated position. I tried a few rounds on a "make-shift-bench", and that was not as comfortable.

    The hand stop really facilitates taking up the rifle in a consistent position, very comfortable for me.

    Arguably the most attractive aspect of this rifle is the barrel marking:
    "KALAKAMAS, OREGON". These rifles are very :cool: indeed!

    Doc2005
     
  14. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    "Too bad so many people are addicted to bench shooting and refuse to learn real shooting skills."

    You have made a faulty assumption. Refuse to learn? What in the world makes you think bench shooters never learned to shoot standing up or prone? Sheesh. Give me a break.


    Meanwhile, I don't have an '82 Gov't Kimber. I thought about it, but didn't buy one. They appear to be very nice rifles but I already had some rifles that would shoot small groups at 50 yards, although the only one that was $600 or less was a Rem 541-S.

    John
     
  15. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Outstanding rifle and marksman then:cool:
     
  16. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    "You have made a faulty assumption. Refuse to learn? What in the world makes you think bench shooters never learned to shoot standing up or prone? Sheesh. Give me a break"

    I was speaking of bench only shooters. There are thousands of them.
     
  17. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    There are? If so, I've only met a few over the decades. The benchrest shooters I know also deer hunt, groundhog hunt, squirrel hunt, duck hunt, shoot clays, etc. Then there are the SASS cowboy shooters with their handguns, rifles and shotguns.

    Oh well, there's plenty of room for everybody, even the plinkers.

    John
     
  18. woof

    woof Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    central Ohio
    I'll say this: I am more impressed with those who can shoot offhand standing and consistently hit an appropriate sized target for the range than I am with those who shoot small groups from the bench. I hardly ever see anyone shoot offhand at my range. When I shoot standing I get strange looks. I can only conclude from that that if there are a lot of bench shooters hunting, they must be shooting from positions they don't get much practice at.
     
  19. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    Or they're only at the range to practice bench shooting for matches or to sight in their guns. For example, I don't have benches at the rural properties where I shoot, so it's off to the range if I need a bench.

    I've always been impressed by any kind of extraordinarily good shooter, but I don't worry about folks' motivations for shooting this way or that.

    I suppose, now that I'm thinking about it, that I've always thought being able to hit aerial targets with a rifle was a much better display of skill than shooting stationary targets. Unfortunately, I lost the only safe place I had to practice this kind of shooting years ago. Those were the days and what I learned on moving targets has served me well over the years.

    John
     
  20. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    "I can only conclude from that that if there are a lot of bench shooters hunting, they must be shooting from positions they don't get much practice at."

    They miss or wound a lot of game.

    I see this all the time.

    They are capable of shooting one hole groups on the bench but without a bench they are not capable of hitting the side of a barn if they were inside it.
     
  21. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    "For example, I don't have benches at the rural properties where I shoot, so it's off to the range if I need a bench"

    I don't have a bench on my range. I don't need one.

    All I need to zero a rifle or to shoot well is a sling.
     
  22. natopotato

    natopotato Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    Location:
    Alaska
    Digging this one up.

    Has anybody ordered one recently? Worth the $600? It would be the most expensive .22 purchase I've ever made, just want to make sure I'm not overlooking another option for a target rimfire.
     
  23. jcwit

    jcwit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,011
    Location:
    Great state of Indiana
    Haven't gotten one lately but was at the No. store in Ohio mid. Oct. They still had NIB Kimbers, worst thing you'll find wrong with these is a slight scratch where someone opened the wrapping to check serial numbers. Probably a make work job for some GI's years ago. As far as accuracy, very good/excellent after finding the ammo they like, and use the good stuff SK, Wolf, Lapua, Eley, ect. The one I have is capable of 5 shot groups easily around a quarter inch at 50 yds. if I do my part.
     
  24. jcwit

    jcwit Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    8,011
    Location:
    Great state of Indiana
    MythBuster you should try out for the Olympics.
     
  25. jaholder1971

    jaholder1971 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    thehighroad.us
    The Kimbers and H&R M12's are the best deals on an accurate rimfire you'll find.

    I bought an M12 ten years ago. Back then they were $400 and the Palma front and rear sights were worth $200.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page