Colt New Frontier Grips

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
384
A few years ago, I decided to get a Colt New Frontier. I didn't think Colt would keep them in production, for much longer. I placed an order for one, with my local gunshop. Just so happened, I got my order in right at the cut off, when production was to end. I waited for a year and three months for it to be delivered. I was happy with it. The bluing and case color was done very nice,better than some of the Colt SAAs that I have seen. Only thing that I didn't like was the grips. The grips looked like pallet wood. They were very plain. There was a small chuck of wood missing, on the left side, where they butted up to the frame. I decided a few weeks ago, I was going to get some grips made for it. I was hesitant to send it off, but knew I would have to, to get grips for a Colt SAA. I searched on the web and came across a website, rockwoodgrips.com after I talked and corresponded with Greg Rockwood, felt better about sending it off. He sent me pictures of wood slabs to choose from. I settled on a set made of Myrtle wood. I also had gold Colt medallions installed. The whole process took less than a month. I was very satisfied with the grips he made for my revolver. They fit perfectly. They are very tight against the frame. The myrtle wood almost looks like the ivory grips, on John Wayne's Colt SAA, the way it is colered. These grips look much better than, the pallet wood grips, Colt put on it.
60967957-D57C-477E-B047-2B5CF7515570.jpeg 6D165F7E-F704-41C9-B1C7-D36714A51AA2.jpeg 9B910B5E-3167-4ED5-8910-CBB6A06A28B4.png B7D4484D-9BDA-4C6A-9328-1E19583BF5FC.png
 
Love the stocks and also love the fact
that you have one of the rarer
4.75-inch barrels, definitely adding
to the value of the gun IMO.

I always wanted a 4.75-incher but
the only one I came across the owner
wanted way too much for it. I did
own a couple of the 7.5-inchers
in .45 Colt.
 
I have been holding off selling my 70s made New Frontier .44 Spec. 7.5" , which I shot a few cylinders full to adjust the sights, found it was capable of astounding accuracy , minutely stripped and cleaned and put it back in the factory box in early 80s , because of the low prices they fetch. The polish and finish is generally better than most standard Gen 2 &3 SAAs that I have bought or had since. but a standard SAA seem to sell for substantially more despite the vastly superior sights. The grips , even way back gen 2 on the New frontier have been less than spectacular , I swapped a set Colt Gutta Percha "Eagle" grips on mine for a while to match my 1972 New Frontier .22 convertible .
Those grips you had made are gorgeous and yes the 4.75 " New Frontiers sell better. There seems to be light at the end of the tunnel and the price of a New Frontier seems to be Creeping up close to Gen 3 SAA now. Interestingly a new Frontier shares the "SAA" roll marking on it's barrel . It is a stronger gun in smaller than .45 calibers IMHO than s standard frame SAA , certainly much better field accuracy too .
 
Love the stocks and also love the fact
that you have one of the rarer
4.75-inch barrels, definitely adding
to the value of the gun IMO.

I always wanted a 4.75-incher but
the only one I came across the owner
wanted way too much for it. I did
own a couple of the 7.5-inchers
in .45 Colt.
Shortly after I bought this one, the gun shop i bought this one from, received another New Frontier 45 Colt, with a 4 3\4" barrel, I bought it also. I am considering selling it, if you are interested. Let me know and I will send you some pictures. It is new, unfired and the cylinder unturned, with the box and all the papers.
 
I have been holding off selling my 70s made New Frontier .44 Spec. 7.5" , which I shot a few cylinders full to adjust the sights, found it was capable of astounding accuracy , minutely stripped and cleaned and put it back in the factory box in early 80s , because of the low prices they fetch. The polish and finish is generally better than most standard Gen 2 &3 SAAs that I have bought or had since. but a standard SAA seem to sell for substantially more despite the vastly superior sights. The grips , even way back gen 2 on the New frontier have been less than spectacular , I swapped a set Colt Gutta Percha "Eagle" grips on mine for a while to match my 1972 New Frontier .22 convertible .
Those grips you had made are gorgeous and yes the 4.75 " New Frontiers sell better. There seems to be light at the end of the tunnel and the price of a New Frontier seems to be Creeping up close to Gen 3 SAA now. Interestingly a new Frontier shares the "SAA" roll marking on it's barrel . It is a stronger gun in smaller than .45 calibers IMHO than s standard frame SAA , certainly much better field accuracy too .
I have always liked the Colt New Frontier and would have have anything, when Colt was making them back in the 70s and early 80s. Trouble was, I didn't have the money back then. When Colt started cataloging New Frontiers in 2012, I should have got one ordered then. I almost waited too long. I got my order in, right at the cutoff, when they were going to stop making them. I am really glad, I didn't miss out. It took a year and three months to get it. I figured Colt was not going to deliver it because it was so close to the cutoff. I remember seeing New Frontiers in the gun cases, when I was a kid and young man, with a family and a young baby to boot. All I could was look at them and a lot of other fine firearms, that were being produced then. I wish I could go back in time, to that time with a few thousand and buy some of what I lusted after then. I guess, stuff like the New Frontier, doesn't get the younger crowd excited. Seems like firearm manufacturers are trying to produce the cheapest firearm now, that will shoot and function. When you go in a gun shop now, you don't see a lot of walnut and steal. It's mostly synthetic and polimer. Very different world now, as firearms go. I see a lot of your post and see your taste runs, like mine. I have always liked pretty wood on my firearms. A handgun is perfect to stock in some pretty wood. I have a 1911, that I have ivory grips on, but they don't do it for me, like pretty, figured wood. You are right, even on the old new frontiers, the factory grips left a lot to be desired. From looking at New Frontiers, listed on auction sights, I believe the current New Frontiers, come with worse grips. They honestly look like pallet wood. No finish at all. I bought another New , the gun shop i frequent, received after I bought this one. I bought it too. It's a 4 3\4" . 45 Colt also. I am considering selling it, but if I keep it, I will be sending it off for grips to, because, it has rough looking grips too. Looks like Colt could do better, on grips. But it's not just colt, some Rugers look like a monkey made the grips. Rugers usually have wide gaps, between the frame and grip frame. I guess the all just put something on them, to get them out the door and leave it to the buyer to correct. Just seems they could all do better on grips, especially in the single actions.
 
Gary W. Strange
I settled on a set made of Myrtle wood. I also had gold Colt medallions installed. The whole process took less than a month. I was very satisfied with the grips he made for my revolver. They fit perfectly. They are very tight against the frame.

You sir have excellent taste in grips for your Colt New Frontier! Mr. and Mrs. Rockwood make some mighty fine looking grip and their very reasonably priced as well!
 
Gary W. Strange makes some good
points about the grips/stocks on
handguns. But in reality, the
manufacturers are danged if they
do and danged if they don't.

I've seen many comments by posters
on various forums how they like to
gussy up their revolvers with pretty,
wonderfully carved wood grips in
exotic woods. But they admit those
grips are for show; on a daily basis
they fall back to rubber grips for
shooting, especially with hot loads.

Just take the old S&W Magna service
grips, they look OK to very nice and
many shooters like them. Some like
them but add Tyler T adapters. Others
go for a Hogue one-piece rubber
model. And others do invest in
"custom" wood grips. Now, which
one if the right one, which one is the
one that everyone will truly prefer
for show and for shooting?

In S&W's case, they issue revolvers
with wood grips on some models
and rubber on others. Some of the
wood looks pretty nice and the rubber
ones are quite functional. The newer
wood ones some buyers complain
are too thin yet the older target stocks
used to earn debit points for being
too thick. And what's too thin to too
fat for each individual shooter?

Ditto for Ruger, some models with the
"Match Champion" or "Roper" style
in wood, others in Hogue and still
others in two sizes of rubber with
wood inserts. Now which one is
the correct one?

Still, back to the New Frontier,
Colt really produced dud grips
for it when the gun as a special
SA deserved better. But owners
usually got around to correcting
that fault and then were able
to declare, "This is truly MY gun."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top