Hmmm...
Some observations in reply to some of the comments I have seen in this thread.
I agree that "best" is subjective if one is discussing the overall impression of a gun. Is best the most accurate? The strongest? The most compact for carry? What are the criteria for determining best?
But "best" certainly CAN be discerned when discussing fit and quality of finish and clearly the Python is superior to any other mass produced revolver. The Python was treated to substantial hand-fitting and polishing and that makes it look nicer. No way around that fact. I understand if you like your S&W or Ruger or whatever better than the Colt. But the Python was the most deluxe production revolver made in terms of quality of finish and denying it won't change the truth.
The Ford/Chevy argument doesn't work. It's more like Ford/Cadillac.
I do not understand why some people want to compare the 586/686 to the Python. Perhaps it is because the S&Ws use a vaguely similar barrel contour. But the 586/686 models were never, ever meant to be deluxe grade revolvers. They were built as service revolvers and are not in the same class as the Python. They are not even in the class directly below the Python. They are several rungs down the ladder in fit and finish. Again, if you like your 586/686 that's fine. But it simply does NOT compare to the Python.
The S&W "Register Magnum" was mentioned as competition for the Python. Problem is the RM was not a regular production gun. It was special order, only, and that disqualifies it from this discussion.
I love how some folks claim the Python is fragile but make no comment regarding the M19 when it is mentioned. I don't see the I frame Colt as weaker than the K frame Smith. Both are plenty strong. Yes, the Colt lockwork can go out of time due to the way it locks up. But this isn't the case with every Colt (I have only had 1 or 2 that suffered this malady) and when they do generally they still function OK, it's just irritating.
IMO the DA Rugers are just about the ugliest guns ever made. But that's just my opinion and Ruger owners swear by their guns so they must be good. Someone noted the massive design of the Ruger parts. They have to be bigger as they are cast rather than forged so they must be thicker to be as strong.
The Dan Wessons are noted for strength and accuracy. Again, is that what's best?
When someone asks which gun is best, and does not specify if he means best in terms of strength, or accuracy, or any other exact feature, I think in terms of fit and finish. That points to the Python in my book.
Some observations in reply to some of the comments I have seen in this thread.
I agree that "best" is subjective if one is discussing the overall impression of a gun. Is best the most accurate? The strongest? The most compact for carry? What are the criteria for determining best?
But "best" certainly CAN be discerned when discussing fit and quality of finish and clearly the Python is superior to any other mass produced revolver. The Python was treated to substantial hand-fitting and polishing and that makes it look nicer. No way around that fact. I understand if you like your S&W or Ruger or whatever better than the Colt. But the Python was the most deluxe production revolver made in terms of quality of finish and denying it won't change the truth.
The Ford/Chevy argument doesn't work. It's more like Ford/Cadillac.
I do not understand why some people want to compare the 586/686 to the Python. Perhaps it is because the S&Ws use a vaguely similar barrel contour. But the 586/686 models were never, ever meant to be deluxe grade revolvers. They were built as service revolvers and are not in the same class as the Python. They are not even in the class directly below the Python. They are several rungs down the ladder in fit and finish. Again, if you like your 586/686 that's fine. But it simply does NOT compare to the Python.
The S&W "Register Magnum" was mentioned as competition for the Python. Problem is the RM was not a regular production gun. It was special order, only, and that disqualifies it from this discussion.
I love how some folks claim the Python is fragile but make no comment regarding the M19 when it is mentioned. I don't see the I frame Colt as weaker than the K frame Smith. Both are plenty strong. Yes, the Colt lockwork can go out of time due to the way it locks up. But this isn't the case with every Colt (I have only had 1 or 2 that suffered this malady) and when they do generally they still function OK, it's just irritating.
IMO the DA Rugers are just about the ugliest guns ever made. But that's just my opinion and Ruger owners swear by their guns so they must be good. Someone noted the massive design of the Ruger parts. They have to be bigger as they are cast rather than forged so they must be thicker to be as strong.
The Dan Wessons are noted for strength and accuracy. Again, is that what's best?
When someone asks which gun is best, and does not specify if he means best in terms of strength, or accuracy, or any other exact feature, I think in terms of fit and finish. That points to the Python in my book.