I'm in the process of assembling a new rifle and took Zak Smith's excellent advice (read his articles, PM etc.) and settled on the .260 Remington as the cartridge/caliber. I already have a custom rifle for F-Class in .308 Win so the .260 seems to be the best way to go for steel plate matches or F-Class Open. I have an action, have ordered a trigger, will be ordering a folding AICS and now need to select a new Krieger barrel. I decided to compare seven popular contours using SolidWorks and a simple application called rifle_frequency_1_2 written by Tom Irvine (sent to me by member Bart B.) which calculates the frequency at which a barrel vibrates as it's excited by a bullet.
Here are the results showing the weight, fundamental frequency and displacement of the muzzle due to the barrel's weight. The barrel frequency (and weight) is calculated using 416 stainless whereas the deflection calculated by SolidWorks uses material properties of 304 stainless with the weight of 416. This discrepancy won't make much, if any, difference to the results. Also, Tom Irvine's utility doesn't account for the chamber or the lands in the barrel so I didn't either in the SolidWorks models. I plan on running these models again with 6 (1/4") or 10 (3/16") flutes along the barrels.
I would imagine that a barrel with a higher frequency but smaller amplitude (less deflection) would have a wider sweet spot in terms of load sensitivity. However, Zak has managed some phenomenal shooting with his .260 Rem with a 26" Standard Palma barrel (suppressor attached). The Standard Palma has the lowest frequency of all seven barrels and the second largest deflection but Zak has shown that with the right load it's very accurate.
Here are the results showing the weight, fundamental frequency and displacement of the muzzle due to the barrel's weight. The barrel frequency (and weight) is calculated using 416 stainless whereas the deflection calculated by SolidWorks uses material properties of 304 stainless with the weight of 416. This discrepancy won't make much, if any, difference to the results. Also, Tom Irvine's utility doesn't account for the chamber or the lands in the barrel so I didn't either in the SolidWorks models. I plan on running these models again with 6 (1/4") or 10 (3/16") flutes along the barrels.
I would imagine that a barrel with a higher frequency but smaller amplitude (less deflection) would have a wider sweet spot in terms of load sensitivity. However, Zak has managed some phenomenal shooting with his .260 Rem with a 26" Standard Palma barrel (suppressor attached). The Standard Palma has the lowest frequency of all seven barrels and the second largest deflection but Zak has shown that with the right load it's very accurate.
Last edited: