Confirmed my love affair of single stacks.

Status
Not open for further replies.

HammsBeer

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
770
Location
USA
So I went to a rental range today to compare my P225 against a few pistols I've been eyeing. Really wanted to try the Ruger LC9s but it was gone for repair (something about a broken spring assembly). None of the other polymer compacts felt right in the hand, or had off putting features. The thumb safety and unease with cocked and locked disqualifies the 1911's for me. I ended up trying a 9mm P239 and a full size .45 P220, both had milled slides and 8 round mags.

The P239 weighs about 3/4 oz more than the P225 but is just a little smaller in all dimensions. Those differences make it feel much more compact but still durable, like you can run it hard without fear of breaking it. Recoil was about the same as the P225. I thought the grip would be too short, but it actually works very well and pointed naturally (I don't have big meaty hands). Mag was easy to load and ran 100%. I think this will make a great carry gun.

I have limited experience in .45's, but that P220 shoots like a dream, and the recoil really is more of a heavy push than a snap. Grip was a little longer front to back but no trouble reaching the trigger. Only issue I had was the last two rounds were extremely hard to load in the 8 round mag. Also ran 100%. This would make a great bedside gun for the house.

I think what is happening in the polymer framed guns is they make the sides of the grips very flat, so even though the front and back strap is rounded it still has a boxy feel, like a 1x2 with the edges rounded. Even the double stack Sigs have an overly thick squarish feel, like I can't get my fingers far enough around the gun. All three of these slim single stack Sigs have curved panels that make an oval shaped circumference around the grip, which to me feels more natural in the hand. I'm convinced that the weight, grip shape, and shootability of these metal framed Sigs outweigh their 8+1 capacity. I'm sold, now to start saving my pennies!
 
Last edited:
HammsBeer

Years ago I had a Browning BDA in .45 and found it to be one of the most ergonomic pistols I have ever used. Very comfortable in my small sized hand, recoil was quite manageable and accuracy was truly amazing, even with fixed sights.
 
I've been carrying a 239 for about 3 years now. It's hard to imagine a situation where the 239 and a spare mag wouldn't get the job done. If I need more firepower than that then maybe I should be retreating.

I'm being dragged into some chick flick later this afternoon by an occasional female companion. The 239 with its Sig Night Sights, 17 rounds of Hornady Critical Duty and an Olight M10 Maverick flashlight will give me all the comfort I need while I'm in there.

Finding good outside the waistband holsters can be a challenge. I was told to check out Fist Holsters. Haven't done that yet.
 
Funny, I was just looking at some single stacks (shield, lc9s, p239, couple others) yesterday and confirmed that they just feel too skinny in my hands, I like a little more "meat" in my guns (and I have medium size hands). Especially the sig (and the p224, though that's a double) with the curves... curving... in all the wrong places.

To each their own, as they say, its lovely that we have so many great options these days.

I will say, off topic, that I was very impressed with the Ruger LC9s trigger, very nice.
 
Funny, I was just looking at some single stacks (shield, lc9s, p239, couple others) yesterday and confirmed that they just feel too skinny in my hands, I like a little more "meat" in my guns (and I have medium size hands). Especially the sig (and the p224, though that's a double) with the curves... curving... in all the wrong places.

To each their own, as they say, its lovely that we have so many great options these days.

I will say, off topic, that I was very impressed with the Ruger LC9s trigger, very nice.
I was shooting my new LC9S today and had to be careful about it shooting before I was ready. The trigger will take some getting used to.
 
Love my 225. One of the most natural pointing handguns I own. I don't feel underarmed with a single stack.
 
An HK P7 is one of my primary carries, so I am a fan of single stacks also.
 
Although I am currently carrying a Hi-Power, a Sig 225 has been my primary carry gun for almost 15 years. It's an awesome gun and I have never felt inadequately-armed with it.
 
Perhaps I should wait a couple months until the NEW 225's come out. I hear there will be some changes such as milled slide, P228 trigger guard, and using a modified P239 mag. But if they do it right, and the grips are thin enough, I may just opt for one of those instead.
 
I have a P225 and I always thought that the only other single stack 9mm sub that really compared to it was the S&W 3913, but that one is also out of production. But another single stack 9mm sub in current production is the alloy-framed CZ RAMI which is a very good gun!
 
I had a 239 and it was a great gun. It just never felt right in my hand. I rented a 220 once and fell in love. I was looking for a carry gun at the time and it was just too big and heavy for me. I would still love one but with social security and a small pension I don't think I'll be buying any thousand dollar guns to play with. I'm pretty well stocked with guns anyway. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top