My point is that it is much easier for the label of "warranting alarm" to look and sound reasonable (regardless of how the person is groomed or dressed) when they have a hawg leg sticking out of their pocket or stuck "Mexican style" in their pants. For most of the sheeple, if they see an "ordinary-looking" handgun in a leather holster, they think "cop" or "detective," as they have been programmed to by Hollywood.
I'm not saying that a "holster exception" applies, I'm just saying that if I (an abosolutly pro-2A, pro-CCW, gun libertarian absolutist) see some guy walking around a store, down the street, going into a bank, with a piece stuck in his pants, I'm going to be at least cautious, maybe even concerned, as long as we are both in the vicinity of one another. It legitimately gives the appearance that going armed was a spontanious decision on their part.
I would rather defend you in court if I could show that what you were carrying was a gun similar to what LEOs may carry and that it was secure in your high quality (and therefore expensive) holster when I plead your case to a judge or jury.
